Skip to comments.Michael Savage: Was Breitbart assassinated?
Posted on 03/02/2012 3:55:20 PM PST by mtnwmn
Noting that the cause of Andrew Breitbarts unexpected death yesterday was being examined by the Los Angeles County Coroners office, talk-radio host Michael Savage raised the question of whether the conservative media powerhouse who recently announced he had videos that could politically damage President Obama was murdered.
On his top-rated show today, Savage played an audio clip of Breitbart telling an audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last month that he had obtained videos that shed light on Obamas ties to radicals in the early 1980s who helped propel him to the presidency
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
The first article that came out about it, which was linked on Drudge, is at http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?hl=en&gbv=2&num=10&lr=&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&tbs=qdr%3Ay&q=cache:xayYWVqBdYUJ:http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/01/us-usa-politics-breitbart-idUSTRE8201AV20120301+Orson+Bean+heart+problems+site%3Areuters.com&ct=clnk
The article starts out with
“Breitbart was walking last night near his Los Angeles home when he collapsed, said his father-in-law, actor Orson Bean.
“He collapsed on the sidewalk and the paramedics were there very quickly and they couldn’t revive him,” Bean told Reuters in a phone interview.
A friend of Breitbart told Reuters he had a history of heart problems and is believed to have suffered a heart attack.”
But then later on it says:
Amid suggestions that Breitbart had suffered a heart attack, Bean said he did not know Breitbart had any cardiac problems and the editor-in-chief of Breitbart.com declined to discuss any details about his health.
Breitbart was transported to a hospital where he was pronounced dead at 12:19 a.m. on Thursday, said Ed Winter, a spokesman for the Los Angeles Department of Coroner. An autopsy is tentatively scheduled for Friday. Winter declined to discuss any possible heart problems Breitbart might have suffered. “He had some medical issues, hadn’t seen a doctor in over a year and we don’t have his medical history yet,” Winter said.
“We have lost a husband, a father, a son, a brother, a dear friend, a patriot and a happy warrior. Andrew lived boldly, so that we more timid souls would dare to live freely and fully, and fight for the fragile liberty he showed us how to love,” a memorial page on Breitbart’s websites said. The message said Breitbart “passed away unexpectedly from natural causes.”
Now I see where the story is changing. And that’s exactly the kind of thing that raises suspicions. A lot of people have talked about how this or that person said this or that, but I have yet to see anything about his alleged heart problems that pre-dates March 1, 2012. If you see something I’d sure like to know about it so I can see it too.
He had a known heart condition, so I think it is going way out on a limb to claim he was knocked off. What is not crazy though is every one of us for the first moments of the story was thinking he was murdered. That is how much we distrust those in charge.
Good question, his father-in-law might be lying and actually an integral part of the assassination........
Web Hubble is still alive
Who was the lady reporter, after the JFK assassination, who was the only reporter to have spoken with either Oswald or Ruby the night before they died - and announced she had a bombshell that she was going to reveal “tomorrow”?
But, conveniently, she died - heart attack - alone, that night - and there were no notes of a story found.
(At least she didn’t ‘commit suicide’ like Vince Foster, or go down in a plane ‘accident’, like Brown (with a bullet hole in his head.)
What a coincidence that Breitbart would say he had tapes - that could be the most damaging yet - and announce: Wait til March 1st” and then die - March 1st?
No chance that the LA coroner’s office would spot a toxic substance in his blood.
I wonder if this is why Rush and Levin haven't even mentioned the Arpaio thing. What message was delivered to Rush yesterday that had all sorts of law enforcement types at his compound after he finished his show? If Breitbart was at Limbaugh's wedding and the last interview Breitbart conducted, it's pretty hard for me to believe they did not have any private exchanges about the Arpaio investigation. Something has obviously let Rush know that it would not be a "career enhancing move" to discuss this publicly. As I think about it now I wonder if Breitbart could be the "racehorse's head" that was delivered to Rush.
Hey, I'm not looking for a fight, believe what you want.......
It really is all right. To some people it is a coincidence. Some people don't like coincidence(s). Some people don't believe in coincidence.
Sure, Savage wants ratings and air time. But he is asking the questions that are in people's heads. On their mind.
I would prefer those questions be asked. I would prefer people voice their opinion.
Because the second you look down, stifle your voice, and just shuffle along, you are headed straight for the gulag.
LIVE FREE OR DIE.
Okay, then who am I thinking of, anybody? One of the Clinton people was administered the wrong drug during surgery and died. And I did misspell Hubbell. :)
The coroners office has already done the autopsy and has “Deferred” it pending toxicology results. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong but if it was a massive heart attack wouldn’t the coroner have seen that right away? Why have the need for toxicology results unless he did not have a heart attack after all?
Actually there's very little chance he planned to release whatever tapes he had on March 1, because he clearly knew about Arpaio's March 1 plans. It just wouldn't make sense to compete for the few outlets that might consider paying attention to anti-Obama bombshells. (Note to SS: Bombshells is being used figuratively here.)
Tell you what, since none of us seem to know, why don't you tell us and provide us with a link to that information?
You are thinking of Mcdougal
Michael made Coast-to-Coast AM sound like mainstream public discourse, but in those rare moments of lucidity, he was ok. We once had a pretty good discussion about colonial black powder firearms and he came across as pretty well versed on the subject.
Perhaps because he was seen drinking in a bar earlier that evening? Perhaps to determine whether or not the amount of alcohol he drank may have had a contributing factor? Perhaps to find out if any of the medications he was taking due to his heart condition may have combined with the alcohol to cause the heart attack?
No worries i still have boxes of tractor feed paper full of prodigy white water board print outs
Corsi mentioned it at the Cold Case Posse’s presser yesterday. He put Breitbart into contact with Arpaio for that interview. I think WND has an article about it but the video of the presser is at www.wnd.com/2012/03/see-evidence-of-fraud-in-obama-birth-certificate/
My computer freezes up every time I go to anything about Arpaio’s presser so I’m going to need to stop for a while. Probably a good thing; I’ve got plenty I need to get done. I just so keenly feel the need to do the job that the press refuses to do, since they are all covering up what was actually said in that press conference.
Was the autopsy completed before 0700 PST?
The father-in-law’s first statements were that he did NOT know of any cardiac problems. Now that story has changed and all these claims about him being HOSPITALIZED with heart problems are coming out of the woodwork.
If it really was an assassination you can bet that his family would start saying he had had heart problems. They’ve got 4 little kids and a wife to protect.
That’s why the change in the stories from early Thursday morning to now is so suspicious. And I know for a fact that Hannity and the others have been threatened in the past. They are saying what George Soros tells them to say. That’s why Glenn Beck left Fox - because Soros kept threatening them for exposing the Soros/Obama communist-Islamist connections, Fox refused to protect the lower-level staffers who were being threatened, and Beck couldn’t protect them all too. So he started his own company where he could say what he wanted and protect his employees as necessary.
I’ve been spending a LOT of time today dealing with these issues so I need to get stuff done, but if you look up my posts you’ll be able to find a recent post where I gave links that detailed what Hagmann said about this stuff. And though I can’t divulge any more than this, I have two other sources, including law enforcement, who corroborate Hagmann’s claims.
We’re talking serious doo-doo here. And that is why we see what we’re seeing out of the “conservative commentators”. You can see it with your own eyes.
I tend to doubt he was assassinated. The last few times I saw him on television he did not look like a well man to me.
But for the sake of argument, if he was, it might have had to do with Sheriff Arpaio’s investigation. If Breitbart had become convinced of Obama’s ineligiblity, he had the platform and respect to singlehandedly sway the opinion of the entire conservative movement. All those naysaying conservative writers, radiomen, and bloggers would not have been quick to dismiss Breitbart. Neither would Drudge. He could have brought incredible pressure on opinionmakers and lawmakers to get to the bottom of Obama’s history.
LOS ANGELES (CBS) The Los Angeles County Coroners office has made an announcement regarding an autopsy on conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart.
The statement read as follows, The examination took place, today, 03/02/2012. The final cause of death has been Deferred pending the receipt of toxicological and microscopic studies. It is anticipated that these test results should be available in 4 to 6 weeks. Once the results have been received and evaluated, a final cause of death will be entered for Mr. Breitbart.
No further information or reports will be available until the final cause of death is established.
The statement was issued by Craig R. Harvey, Chief Coroner Investigator & Chief of Operations.
That lady was columnist Dorothy Kilgallen. A darn good investigative reporter at the time.
Has Bean changed his story - or is it just the conflicting statement from the “friend”?
Wouldn’t surprise me one bit. I know these threats are real. I’ve got sources, I’ve checked out the timing of various related events, and we can all see with our own eyes that “conservatives” are not touching this issue even though a legitimate law enforcement body has said there is probable cause for forgery and fraud - as well as some other things, like that the newspaper announcements are not credible because there are 3-year-olds and foreign-born children listed in those announcements. And that a witness is willing to testify that he heard Bill Ayers’ mom introduce Obama as a foreign student they were helping get an American education.
Why would none of the “conservative media” find it interesting in the least that a law enforcement body had that kind of evidence?
I know why, and everybody in the media knows why. They’re just too scared to tell us why. That’s what terrorism, and we’re dealing with a George Soros who has said he’s afraid the US will win the “war on terror”. IOW, he embraces the use of terror to bring America down. Interesting, too, that his ex-girlfriend came out - according to a thread here on FR on Wed evening, shortly before Breitbart died - saying she has tapes that she’s willing to air, so people will believe that Soros has had a stalker trying to scare her. These are the tactics of a criminal jerk who hates America.
Did I read of hear that there was a jogger somewhere near by?
Right wing conspiracy theorists know what happened to Breitbart ...www.examiner.com/.../right-wing-conspiracy-theorists-know-what-h...You +1’d this publicly. Undo
11 hours ago President Obama killed controversial conservative blogger Andrew Brei. ... of March 2, some 27 hours after Breitbart collapsed on a sidewalk near his home .... Very little mention of the jogger seen running by Breitbart minutes ...
Exactly. They could assume that Breitbart would leave the tapes to somebody else, but when he had the interview with Arpaio as if he was actually willing to report on it, he - the lone individual - became truly dangerous to Soros/Obama.
And he was dead a few hours later.
The problem is that it seems that FOX is involved in them coming out, and they need 10 days to edit them. I sure don’t trust FOX. They will put them out to satisfy the public, but the most revealing parts will sit on the edit room floor. They will dupe the public. Andrew would have made sure that the most revealing parts were released.
The moral of the story is that when you see them then don’t think for one minute that you are seeing what Andrew intended you to see. By the time Fox gets done with them then they will be a nothing burger.
From what I’ve read, if the reporters have reported it correctly, Bean changed his story.
It was Dorothy Kilgallen.
Thank you, Varina - and here ya go, Hot Tabasco, even tho’ your remark to me was ingenuous.
Not for nothing, just say-in!
You say: “I heard she died of an accidental mixture of pills, maybe barbiturates, and alcohol.
“Note to would-be journalists: Let your bombshell be your bombshell.”
Indeed. Journalist students should be made to write that 100 times and then make a sign for their desks.”
‘...What is not crazy though is every one of us for the first moments of the story was thinking he was murdered. That is how much we distrust those in charge....’
exactly. sad state we’re in and, more sad, is the way things are going looks like that’s how we’ll continue...God help our country.
I like to think so.. :-)
I realize now after reading your comments on this thread, that your comment to me yesterday was indeed an attempt to be snarky.
I see you are an ‘old timer’ and gives you some bragging right, so be it. You have no idea how old I am, what I do for a living, how involved I may have been in anything political and yet, take the sign on date as a evidence that I’m simply a ‘noob’ - you had your fun poking at me I’m sure, guess that’s what passes for a thrill here.
I see a puppet for a president who has run rough shed over everything that is sacred in our country and without so much as a wimper from anyone who is in a position to halt this train wreck - yet there are those who refuse to accept the possibility that the jagoff pulling the strings to unravel our way of life is somehow unconcerned, incapable or uninterested in making a statement by eliminating a very big voice of opposition - yea, I almost believe the tooth fairy again -
And yet, the hot topic of the day is a woman posing as a girl who can’t get birth control and THIS is somehow central to our nation’s survival.
Those who are blinded by power and control surely wouldn’t bother taking out any opposing voices....pfft
It was Dorothy Kilgallen.
Dorothy Kilgallen and Orson Bean used to be on the “What’s My Line?” TV game show together:
The killer may not have realized that killing him wouldn't stop the video.
The odds are given that he had a history of heart trouble, that he died of natural causes.
However, the question is very appropriate
Wow... GREAT memory. Very interesting story. I don't think I ever knew about it. I was pretty little then. But, I DEFINITELY remember seeing her on re-runs of What's My Line.
What's odd is that I don't remember Orson Bean's being on that show but it ran a long time.
But the juxtaposition of those two in this discussion kind of gives me a creepy feeling.
It's not like the first thing I think is he was murdered because I took the news at face value. Then you start to wonder. If he did have dinner at Ayers' and then interview Arpaio (and the latter probably trusted him with a confidence), it's all circumstantial but just weird.
And if he was a regular at that bar, his enemies surely knew it and from there, almost anything is possible.
To find out if a heart attack was precipitated by drug use (or poisoning). They need the toxicology results before the autopsy so they can look for the effects on organs.
RIGHT WHOS NEXT...
Guys, just because you’re 43 doesn’t mean you’re immune from bad health or health problems.
Are you part of his inner circle? No.
Are you part of his family? No.
This talk of assassination is just pouring salt into the wound.
FYI: Michael Savage can go suck it.
As per Stalin and Beria, fear is the purpose. History, you know.
I followed Breitbart on Twitter and he was always getting the most hateful tweets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.