Skip to comments.Andrew Breitbart's Cause of Death - Conspiracies (VIDEO included)
Posted on 03/04/2012 7:43:16 AM PST by ak267
Andrew Breitbart's friends at PJ Media have posted a video celebrating Andrew's life. Hopefully this video will help those of you who find yourselves afflicted with the "conspiracy theory mentality" regarding Andrew's sudden and untimely death.
You will actually have to watch the video, though. It is 20-minutes long. Some of you who are so "conspiracy-minded" may find this a challenge to sit through.
As evidenced in the video below, his close friends are NOT surprised by his death. Why are you? Because you didn't know him? Because he was only 43-years-old? Because he was planning to release some potentially incriminating evidence against President Obama? The evidence is still going to be released. Andrew's family says the cause of his death was "probably a heart-attack."
(Excerpt) Read more at nebraskattitude.blogspot.com ...
Assasinations have happened thousands of times in human history and it would be totally naive to think there are not people who are willing to kill in order to forward their agenda.
Nah, communists never kill for the cause. Just ask the journalists in Russia. And besides, our communists in power are far more ethical and human than everyone else’s communists.
When someone dies suddenly less than a month after announcing his intention to soon reveal explosive tapes about a prominent political figure during an election year, questions will inevitably arise.
Every mystery story from Sherlock Holmes to the latest true-crime novel is based on a suspicion by a courageous or intrepidly truth-seeking investigator that something in the official report was not kosher.
In the Andrew Breitbart case, there is now not only cause for suspicion about his untimely-yet-seemingly-very-timely death, but also about the fact that those close to him are so intensely interested in closing the case.
Andrew Breitbart was himself a courageous investigator who went up against enormous forces who wanted him to stop his investigation. Yet, when his investigation was stopped, we’re supposed to believe Andrew died of natural causes?! And no one seems more fanatic about making Andrew Breitbart appear to be just a regular goofy guy who happened to drop dead on a street at one a.m. than those closest to him? Move on, everyone, nothing to see here.
Yes, people have heart attacks, just as sometimes dogs actually eat people’s homework, but in this case especially, reasonable people should not be expected to fall for such a lame explanation and simply move on.
Please read (and save) my damning "J'accuse" of the Obama regime, Murdergate, and the liberal media establishment that protects the murdering leftist criminals.
I wrote and published it one day before the "death by natural causes" of Andrew Breitbart, while he was taking a routine evening walk alone near his home.
Matt Bracken, AKA Travis McGee on Free Republic
I think one learns to be skeptical and, with American politics in general and with the demonrat party specifically, we have excellent teachers.
Just consider a few examples: Lincoln, the Kennedy brothers, MLK, the Clinton death list, etc., and you'll understand why it's so easy to believe AB's untimely death may not be all that 'natural' and why many of us are not all that trusting of the PTB.
Absolute power got together with the Chicago Way and their love child is capable of anything.
When Whitney Houston was found dead, there were changing stories as to what the cause was. Initially, it was reported that she possibly had drowned in the bath tub. But, each time, the story said something to the effect that it was “apparently caused by ...”
Andrew Breitbart’s death and cause of death (by natural causes) both were announced at the same time (before any post-mortem being done). There was never any suggestion that was “apparently caused by natural causes”. This is what causes a red flag to go up.
My favorite: Breitbart separates the wheat from the chaff with “Do you love Sarah Palin?”
The rest of this Conspiracy stuff is just a waste of time.
Rove is, obviously, playing both sides :-)
Minimal interest among these four about the young Obama tapes that Breitbart said were a big deal; how many years was it before we found out Bobby Kennedy spent the day with Marilyn Monroe the day she died just the way “the narrative” was set up to appear “not surprising.”
Everybody wants to say “Andrew had a heart problem!” well guess what??? he also had a liberal problem. If you don’t believe that, you don’t get around the internet much. I’d say it’s a 50/50 possibility (one or the other) and people who want to criticize sane, thinking people for wanting to wait for the truth? what do you think we feel about YOUR position. Oh, and haven’t we been taught to “trust but verify” by Andrew and others who lead the fight to take our country back?
bookmark for later viewing.
I never heard that one. Where does this information come from?
Why would anyone want to have Breightbart killed? Silly conspiracies theories.
Fred, remember some time back someone was asking if anyone had heard about Obama killing a boy? I said I thought I had read in Obama's book, Dreams From My Father, something about a boy being killed and it was not to long after that, that Obama was sent to his grandparents.
Jayster, where did you get this information from?
well, wouldn't that be wonderful, then there would only be muslim girls left in islamic countries and our problems with islam would solve themselves...
As to the other part of that gruesome story, I would also be interested in more detail.
12:58 of video... “Alan Colmes upon whose wit and intelligence no comment is required”
To Shelly Dankert I would say (using her own words): “That doesn’t mean it’s ‘OK’ for you to make and/or spread BASELESS ........... prognostications about the ultimate cause of his (Breitbart’s) death.......If.......you continue to spread the .............. theories about Andrew’s death, shame on you. Shame on you for spreading lies.”
Because that’s what she is doing when she essentially ASSUMES that he died of natural causes and self-righteously declares that anyone who harbors any suspicion whatsoever that there MAY be A POSSIBILITY of a non natural cause of death is a CONSPIRACY THEORIST and, by implication, a nut-case. I’m surprised she’s not out DEMANDING that the Los Angeles Medical Examiner cease and desist from carrying out an autopsy to determine the cause of death when it’s obvious to right thinking folks such as Miss Dankert that it’s due to natural causes.
I don’t know if Dankert was the person who posted the link to her blog here. If so, I would say that it is not good form to come here and, in effect, insult all FReepers who may have some suspicion.
As for me, I’m waiting for the medical examiner’s report.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.