Posted on 03/22/2012 12:56:37 PM PDT by Morgana
The part that jumped out at me was the Judge saying, she had no right to cause these Women Extra Pain and Grief. That must mean He thinks they are suffering so why would He be so for it. Oh FYI , just a side note, got a new VA handbook the other day, was glancing through it and The VA does not pay for abortions, I wonder if The Boy in the Oval knows that.lol
get ready. soon we may all have to decide whether to deny Jesus or to go to jail.
Decide now and avoid the rush!
she was wrong to tresspass.
the judge is wrong on a fundamental right issue by bringing religion into the ruling.
you violated probation, the end. done.
it is kanada so who knows what they will do.
As long as he doesn’t interrupt the service or Sunday school, he’s fine.
If you were passing by and witnessed a victim of a drive-by shooting and that victim happened to fall back onto private property and you also happened to notice a do not trespass sign on that property would you morally compelled to trespass and help the victim even though your odds of saving him are small or is it a higher moral duty to stay off the property and allow the victim to die?
That “judge” is going to get an eye-opener when he sees the real Judge of the Universe.
Judge should have left religion out of it, but if she’s breaking the law, and admits she’ll continue to do so if released, then she should remain in prison. Maybe her path is to minister to her fellow prisoners?
Mary Wagner’s Arrest November 8th 2011 Bloor St West Women’s Clinic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIZNx-IhONs
You are talking about someone soliciting what should be capital murder. Thank you for playing.
Well, an atheist is welcome in my church. If he wants to pass out atheist literature I’ll be happy to read it and talk with him about it afterward. Your analogy doesn’t seem to work very well.
This judge sure is anxious to make sure women have access to an abortion. hmmm...I wonder why?
Not quite on the Luther mention.
He said this during his defense of the theses and his subsequent writings at the Diet of Worms (Diet = Congress) in front of the Holy Roman Emperor.
He was asked to recant all his writings. Luther’s response was fascinating. He divided his books into three parts.
Books on simple evangelical truths that even his enemies agreed with: These he could not recant.
Books against the corruption of the papacy: These he could not retract without cloaking wickedness and tyranny.
Books against his popish opponents: These he admitted were too vitriolic; however, he could not retract those either, lest his enemies triumph and make things worse.
He said, “Unless I am refuted and convicted by testimonies of the Scriptures or by clear arguments (since I believe neither the Pope nor the Councils alone; it being evident that they have often erred and contradicted themselves), I am conquered by the Holy Scriptures quoted by me, and my conscience is bound in the word of God: I can not and will not recant any thing, since it is unsafe and dangerous to do any thing against the conscience. Here I stand! I cannot do otherwise. God help me! Amen.”
Actually, it does. You don’t mind atheists in your church. It’s your church and that’s fine. The abortion clinic does NOT want this gal there. It’s their property and that is also fine.
Thy royal black robed Pharisee and Saducee hath spoken.Jesus didn’t have nice things to say about those judicial phoneys in His time either. Heck they crucified the Son of God thinking that they were doing the Almighty a favor.
Instant Karma’s gonna get you
Gonna knock you right on the head
You better get yourself together
Pretty soon you’re gonna be dead
What in the world you thinking of
Laughing in the face of love
What on earth you tryin’ to do
It’s up to you, yeah you
Sorry. Twas off the top of my head and I should have remembered that it was in the Diet
Thanks for the correction. My brain does not always recall correctly. Interesting though that you only commented to correct me not to decry this pompous ass of a judge
I f you know someone is murdering babies one minute after birth,is it morally higher to obey property rights than intervene?
How about if the baby is being murdered one second after birth?
Or one minute before birth?
Or one month before birth?
Comparing a church service as equivalent in any way to un-natural abortion is ridiculous unless you consider abortion the sacrement of evil and the clinic the house of worship of evil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.