Skip to comments.If only Sarah Palin had run ...
Posted on 03/29/2012 4:43:57 PM PDT by Java4Jay
The GOP needs a Tea Party candidate -- either Sarah Palin or someone very like her. Alas, it's going to have to wait until 2016 to get its rogue.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Sarah/West would clean house on both Romney and . People are tired of the established parties. This country needs clean slate, a party that doesn’t have the , who makes back room deals. People are tired of being controlled. It’s time for us to go back to whats important for the future, back to the constitution and the foundations this country was built on.
agreed just imagine Sarah and Col Allen West running.
The base of the party would be loving it, the left could never ever say the right hates women or blacks if we had that ticket, the state of FL would come to our side which we need but more importantly they are not the establishment, they are the average person who can connect with us .
Romney has no clue how we live, how we shop, how we have to go without even at the store for food.
Yes I want Sarah and West to come in and save us form this mess the establishment and Romney have given us.
I know the establishment will use our disagreement of obama to get us to vote for their guy but they did this last time and now we have had enough.
Enough is enough, no more for me will I just get in line, give money and get out the vote here, I’ve had it.
Ditto. Not one dollar, not one vote. Things can't be that bad...hundreds of millions still being spent at the movies; sports arenas and stadiums still packed; millions still being spent sending our children to college. Maybe everything is okay.
Then you say ,People who say we're lost without her say it loud and clear. No one person is that important. No one. To say that there is one person who can fix things elevates that person beyond their abilities and directly implies that it isn't "We The People".
Then you say It just doesn't work to turn anyone to our side. We need votes.
WHO IS THE ONE PERSON WHO WILL LEAD? That is what people are talking about and you KNOW IT. But it's always 'Sarah the Savior' smug remarks, or one person can't do it. They don't say it with their favorite candidate. ONE PERSON LEADS - and IF PEOPLE WANT SARAH - YOU WILL HAVE TO EAT HUMBLE PIE as much as you want to chime in with your 'one person can't do it.
Less relying on a "magic" politician to solve our every problem.
What "MAGIC" politician would you be addressing smugly??
How can we hold politicians responsible if we won't take each other to task (civilly) and hold each other responsible?
Oh Please, grow up. You aren't going hold any politician responsible, they do what they want and then they do something good and all is forgotten. If you have to babysit the politician, you already voted for the wrong "MAGIC" politician. People want someone that has a proven record, who hasn't reneged on their promises, someone we they can trust someone has fought HARD and NOT crossed the aisle. And they are few and far between because of the GOP E will make it miserably for them when they DON'T follow their path.
And who is that person that MANY see as that is SARAH. So get OVER it already with your 'MAGIC' and 'NO ONE can' to FEEL GOOD. That's childish talk!! Moreso, with a WeThePeople SARAH or with candidate 'WeThePeople Newt'.
The GOP E certainly KNOWS it is on ONE persons shoulders and they DON'T want her or NEWT - they want mitt. They wouldn't have to fight so hard with money/media AGAINST that one person - if that ONE person wasn't important.
Do you think the ONE person Mitt and the ONE person NEWT would have the same administration? Do you think our country would be the same in four years with either having Mitt or NEWT? Well, you just ain't thinking. It would be as different as day and night!!!
That ONE PERSON MAKES THE DIFFERENCE!! Ask those who voted for REAGAN and those wanna be REAGAN'S, if ONE PERSON didn't make a difference. Mitt detested Reagan and look who is supporting him - how's that for the GOP E and them wanting to take control of our country through ONE person. Now when some WANT Sarah to be that ONE person - don't come along with your 'feel good' holier than thou response. You ain't fooling anyone.
Here's your silly rant back at you...People who say we're lost without her say it loud and clear. No one person is that important. No one. To say that there is one person who can fix things elevates that person beyond their abilities and directly implies that it isn't "We The People".
One person - Obama. One person - Newt. One person - Mitt.
What ONE person is a proven leader, a historian of our GREAT country and IS the 'WeThePeople' candidate? What ONE person does the GOP E NOT want?
I just wonder if there is any way he'd say 'yes' if he comes out of the transplant well enough.
2016 is too late, game over.
2008 was too late...game was over
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.