Posted on 04/02/2012 11:26:01 PM PDT by yank in the UK
The question of troop involvement in a possible upcoming Martial Law scenario that is being predicted is no imaginary possibility – nor is it a ‘conspiracy theory’. Other tough questions are being discussed such as, “Will the U.S. government confiscate Gold and Silver in an economic collapse?” and “Will there be a round-up of American Citizens to be put into FEMA Camps?” Many believe that the United Nations will be given authority to step in to keep the peace in any civil unrest or economic collapse. This is a strong possibility. Readers should be familiar with the term ‘Hidden In Plain Sight’. How this applies to the United Nations is simple.
(Excerpt) Read more at theintelhub.com ...
“United”
Exactly. Clearly half this nation are liberals and at least half of the so-called conservatives would do as their “authorities” ask. Toss in a military beholden to liberals ways of homos and they believe they have the upper hand.
Sure is.
That’s Kent state and not a good example of troops firing on civilians. Those National Guard troops were provoked and were in fear for their lives.
They do want it and will take it but not in the way you'd give it.
And much of the civilian population is scared of guns. I’ve read other sites where they’ve said they’d rather die than have anything to do with them even in a hit the fan situation.
That's why it's better left unsaid, isn't it.
There are true ghettos and the ghetto mentality in Dallas, Ft. Worth, Houston, El Paso, Austin, McAllen, Brownsville, Galveston, Killeen and you'd find many anywhere east of I35. There was the "white flight" out of Dallas in the '70s. There are those generation after generation welfare recipients who haven't been off Galveston Island their entire lives.
is a quote by Isoroku Yamamoto, Commander-in-Chief of the Imperial Japanese Navy during World War II. Of course it was originally stated in Japanese, this is the English translation.
1999 all over again, Michael Rivero, is that you?
There were reports that the Nat Guard troops were fired upon at Kent State.
you sure about no Army personnel? I mean, not that snipers, spotters, choppers, armor etc.. are considered Military. I just thought they were part of the Army.... on loan. You know, TDY Of course I believe the Clintons and the Justice Dept. that no army personnel was involved, cause then that would mean civilians were killed by US soldiers on American soil.
I did about 23 years ago. My MOS was on the deck with a weapon in the boonies. I got to play in 29 palms and the fun streets of Carlsbad, even played in the beautiful wetlands off Sneads Ferry and Chad"licks" Bay. Walked along the quiet streets of Parris......... Island and even went on romantic cruises to Indonesia, Nicaraugua, Lebanon.
If I was told to fire on American citizens that were threatening me and my brothers by my CO I'd assess the threat and lay down coordinated fields of fire with flanking maneurvuers until the threat was destroyed, objective taken and perimeter secure.
As for "how it's done"... just put your feet on the yellow footprints in the street and enjoy the ride brother.
There's no rhyme or reason for my odd insanity
You don't know what's going on inside of me
You don't wanna know what's going through my mind, yeah yeah yeah
"Go ask Alice"
:)
“I’ve read other sites where they’ve said they’d rather die than have anything to do with them even in a hit the fan situation.”
I got no problem with that.
US troops would most likely not be hampered by the same ROE as they operate under in Afghanistan in such a US scenario.
Do you think it will start with our best trained and combat hardened troops?
No.
I........can’t.........stop.............staring......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.