Skip to comments.Mitt hits bullís-eye
Posted on 04/06/2012 7:14:45 AM PDT by samtheman
The president, Romney said, has spent the last four years laying the foundation for a new government-centered society.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Only because Myth HUNG the bullseye.
HOT AIR WIND MACHINE IN ACTION.
Mitt will make a better Utopia than Obama’s.
.......The only problem is that Mittens will never be elected President of the U.S. GOP moderates do not win elections.
If he were an honest man he would have acknowledged that the foundation laying has been going on for 20 years.
The flak author purports HIS position represents
Flipper the magic RINO, and then goes on to claim
"it (sic) offers voters a clear and unambiguous choice".
Step right up folks, to see the fight of the century:
Big Government Willard vs. Big Government Barry!
“Step right up folks, to see the fight of the century:
Big Government Willard vs. Big Government Barry!”
Well said. Neither gets my vote.
Very true...for and about every President since Reagan.
And, just like every President since Reagan, Romney fully intends to strengthen and improve that foundation.
For those not paying attention, Romney LOVES Big Government, Inc.! The Bigger the Better!
He just doesn't like the poor job obama and the demonrats have done financing it.
That's the vote in 2012:
Who do you trust to finance and grow the biggest, most powerful, centralized US government ever?
The demonrats or the GOPe rinos?
What a PHONY! Worse than McCain. At least McCain suffered at the hands of the Vietnamese enemy and did his time. But ROMNEY? What has he ever done for this country??
And, just like every President since Reagan, Romney fully intends to strengthen and improve that foundation.Absolutely correct. And in fact, after Perry collapsed I switched to Gingrich because of his debating skills but the fact is, I don't entirely trust Gingrich on this issue.
I do entirely trust Perry on this issue.
Since the nomination process is pretty much over (though I will be voting for Newt if he's on the ballot in NJ when the circus comes to NJ), I'm going back to my original first love in this campaign, and openly express my nostalgia for what should have been: Rick Perry for President.
He was the ONLY one who I believe in on the issue of radically cutting the size of government.
Vote for any of these chumps, and, if elected,Americans (AINOs, most of ‘em) can then return to their self-induced amnesia; those of the sleeping giant (drunks) just stirring can roll over and go back to sleep!
The new potus can then go undercover in office as have his lessers of evil predecessors done.
Since running and electing a real candidate (there IS only one)is out of the question, just vote for obama again, and a fraction of the public will at least have a clue what has befallen us.
I think I’m beginning to feel sympathy for Romney. His remark on Augusta yesterday was just funny. His solution to the problem of admitting women was “well if I owned Augusta”. He just has a hopelessly wealthy man’s world view and can’t even hear his own gaffes. He’s doomed.
Milt came to my area yesterday, and although it sounded at times as if he was reading his script, his speech was stammering and ineffective. No TV cameras allowed.
Two weeks ago, I had the privilege of hearing in person four REAL political talents who all spoke from the heart with nary a note. Santorum, Cain, Gingrich and Pat Toomey were all masterful and powerful. All I could think was “Oh no!” How in the name of our Lord did the GOP ever get fooled by negative ads and a candidate too cowardly to appear on Beck or Levin? Are we stoopid? Bob
Yep. Pathetic all the way.....
Mittens is a socialist, not a “moderate.” He has the same agenda as Obama - socialized medicine, global warming, socially engineering marriage and family out of existence, bothering public school children with radical sexual ideology, fascist corporatism, globalism, etc. He could care less about the constitution and he hates conservatives.
In my opinion, the liberal media made up that “moderate” label to hide socialism in the Republican party in their effort to take over both parties. The “moderates” in the Republican party are “progressives”, aka, socialists. They opened primaries to democrats so they could pick socialists for the GOP.
What about W? He was no conservative. You could say he tricked us, but he did run on “compassionate conservatism”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.