Drats! Down the warmhole the warming went (From Harvard people...?? what ???)

watts up with that? ^ | April 26, 2012 | Anthony Watts

[6ppc]

I’d hit her chakra!

[The_Reader_David]

Actually the only folks who laughed at the debate over angels dancing on the head of a pin were and are folks who don’t know what the sides were: it was finitely many vs. infinitely many, not, say 5 vs. 10,000, and was a debate about where space is infinitely divisible or not, which is still a matter of interest in fundamental physics. (The answer seems to be that it is not, though whether there are smallest bits or not is open, with the weight of opinion favoring the very strange position that there are neither smallest parts nor is it infinitely divisible — look up the notion of Planck length to see how that is thought to work and why most physicists who work on such matters think so).

[Marine_Uncle]

From the article: "Observed change in surface air temperature between 1930 and 1990. Observations are from the NASA GISS Surface Temperature Analysis. Image courtesy of Eric Leibensperger."
Oh. Ok. So the whole study is negated as we found out Hansen has badly mangled the raw data via. GISS mismanagement.

[houeto]

The work also carries significant implications for the future climate of industrial nations, like China, that have not yet implemented air quality regulations to the same extent as the United States.

Ya think?

[nascarnation]

can also cause acid rain

Remember back in the 90s when the world was gonna die because of acid rain?

[justa-hairyape]

Post modern science. When observations fail to match theory predictions, keep the original theory, while adding another theory explaining why the original theory had no predictive value. May explain why the tax code is so thick.