Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dentist pulled out ALL boyfriend's teeth after he dumped her
Daily Mail ^ | April 27, 2012 | Simon Tomlinson

Posted on 04/28/2012 10:34:21 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

A dentist pulled out all her ex-boyfriend’s teeth after he dumped her for another woman – who has now left him because he is toothless.

Anna Mackowiak, 34, is facing jail after taking her revenge on 45-year-old Marek Olszewski when he turned up at her surgery with toothache just days after breaking up with her.

She gave him a heavy dose of anaesthetic and plucked his teeth out.

She then wrapped his head and jaw in a bandage to stop him opening his mouth and said there had been complications and he would need to see a specialist.

The dentist, who works in Wroclaw, Poland, said: ‘I tried to be professional and detach myself from my emotions.

'But when I saw him lying there I just thought, "What a b******".'

Mr Olszewski said: 'I knew something was wrong because when I woke up I couldn’t feel any teeth and my jaw was strapped up with bandages.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: PapaBear3625
One thing I have noticed over the years, is the number of women who react gleefully to hearing about a woman committing an act of violence against a man, in retaliation to his breaking up with her, or otherwise upsetting her ego.

I was in California in 1989 when Betty Broderick murdered her ex-husband and his new "trophy" wife in cold blood. A few days later, while driving I listened to a radio talk show on which female caller after caller expressed gushing approval for what Broderick had done. In fact, Broderick had never been abused by her husband, she had received a VERY substantial divorce settlement, and there was good evidence that she was insane. Somehow all that counted for nothing. He had divorced her, not the other way around. He was the man, she was the woman. For that Dan and Linda Broderick somehow deserved to be shot to death in their bedroom. The misandry of those callers was so thick it practically dripped out of my car speakers.

It was the first time in my life that I heard a group of people wholeheartedly endorse first-degree murder.

Berry Broderick was also supported by the feminist press, which included Los Angeles Times reporter Amy Wallace. Wallace's coverage of the case was sickeningly biased.

The experience opened my eyes and gave me a push toward conservatism.

61 posted on 04/28/2012 5:03:30 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: buffyt

You think this is funny?


62 posted on 04/28/2012 5:04:44 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!-Sam Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Mackowiak is being investigated for medical malpractice and abusing the trust of a patient. She could face three years in jail.

At least in the United States, her actions would be considered assault and battery. It is illegal to perform surgery without the patient's informed consent.

63 posted on 04/28/2012 5:09:38 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChad
At least in the United States, her actions would be considered assault and battery. It is illegal to perform surgery without the patient's informed consent.

Intentionally and with malice, causing permanent loss or impairment of a body part (which includes teeth) has committed the crime of maiming. Depending on severity, under the US Code, the person faces up to 20 years.

64 posted on 04/28/2012 5:31:27 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

her facebook?:
http://www.facebook.com/amackowiak


65 posted on 04/28/2012 5:48:23 PM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Depending on severity, under the US Code, the person faces up to 20 years.

Far more appropriate than three years.

66 posted on 04/28/2012 6:08:51 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TChad

Three to five years would be appropriate for the teeth episode. Twenty would be more appropriate for more severe maimings like blinding, making somebody a paraplegic, etc.


67 posted on 04/28/2012 6:44:40 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY; a fool in paradise
"Baby, I'd give all of my teeth to be with you!"
68 posted on 04/28/2012 6:51:46 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Three to five years would be appropriate for the teeth episode.

I was referring to the range. Up to three years sounds inadequate to me, up to twenty years sounds more like it, especially if, as I have heard, the maximum sentence is rarely imposed.

69 posted on 04/28/2012 7:26:49 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

In a civil suit. The DA filed charges agaunst the doc..he ultimately copped a plea..probation, community service..to avoid jailtime..but by admitting guilt..he had no defense..she sued him for everything...and he just turned it over..Sorry for the confusion in not explaining it more carefully..


70 posted on 04/29/2012 9:44:18 AM PDT by ken5050 (FRACK Obama!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Sorry for the confusion in not explaining it more carefully..

Oh,OK...I thought you were saying that she won it in *divorce* court.Yah,civil suit...assault...I can see the guy being cleaned out by a judge or jury.

71 posted on 04/29/2012 10:05:30 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Unlike Mrs Obama,I've Been Proud Of This Country My *Entire* Life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: goseminoles

Her criminal behavior is his fault?


72 posted on 04/30/2012 4:33:22 PM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Altariel

Yes. He’s a dumbass. Would you let an ex put you out and extract incisors? Not a chance!!!


73 posted on 04/30/2012 4:41:57 PM PDT by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Enough of these toothless attacks on a fine medical professional!


74 posted on 04/30/2012 4:45:08 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goseminoles

Not all ex-girlfriends would extract their ex-boyfriend’s teeth out.

She made that choice. She could have asked someone else to tend to her ex-boyfriend’s dental care. She chose to engage in criminal behavior.

Blaming the victim is unconservative.


75 posted on 04/30/2012 4:52:27 PM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Altariel

Blah blah blah. Being a decider of poor choices is a common sense issue. Nothing to do with politics. Some people are morons. Who in their right mind would subject themselves to this possibility? Let’s be real here. Apparently some on Fr are not in touch with reality. Hell hath no....


76 posted on 04/30/2012 5:05:47 PM PDT by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: goseminoles

His actions do not constitute a criminal offense. Hers do.

She was the fool—she didn’t care what the consequences were, so long as she got “revenge”.

Let the left blame the victim. Conservatives are above that behavior.


77 posted on 04/30/2012 5:17:39 PM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson