Skip to comments.Dentist pulled out ALL boyfriend's teeth after he dumped her
Posted on 04/28/2012 10:34:21 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
A dentist pulled out all her ex-boyfriends teeth after he dumped her for another woman who has now left him because he is toothless.
Anna Mackowiak, 34, is facing jail after taking her revenge on 45-year-old Marek Olszewski when he turned up at her surgery with toothache just days after breaking up with her.
She gave him a heavy dose of anaesthetic and plucked his teeth out.
She then wrapped his head and jaw in a bandage to stop him opening his mouth and said there had been complications and he would need to see a specialist.
The dentist, who works in Wroclaw, Poland, said: I tried to be professional and detach myself from my emotions.
'But when I saw him lying there I just thought, "What a b******".'
Mr Olszewski said: 'I knew something was wrong because when I woke up I couldnt feel any teeth and my jaw was strapped up with bandages.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Not to mention hernia, vasectomy, intimate tattoo work, etc.
FYI..NY IS a no fault divorce state..
Welcome visitor from the 1960s. You must also know some good Negro jokes, huh? Let’s hear ‘em!
Tooth extraction: $25 ANY tooth, 4 for $75
There is a $600 surcharge for anesthesia. It is highly recommended.
I’m having a hard time deciding if you are trying to be serious, or if you forgot the sarcasm tag. If not, that might be the most astoundingly ignorant thing I’ve ever read on this site.
Here is some mildly humorous education reading for you.
Well said PapaBear. This is not some cartoon where a cat gets all his teeth knocked out, this is a real guy having about the worst thing possible done to him.
Since when is maiming someone funny? The guy broke up with her, he wasnt a rapist!
MEMO TO SELF: Always remember to put in your dentures before seeing a new girlfriend.
“Where is the rest of me???”
Ronald Regan in “King’s Row”
Then how did the wife get everything rather than half?
I was in California in 1989 when Betty Broderick murdered her ex-husband and his new "trophy" wife in cold blood. A few days later, while driving I listened to a radio talk show on which female caller after caller expressed gushing approval for what Broderick had done. In fact, Broderick had never been abused by her husband, she had received a VERY substantial divorce settlement, and there was good evidence that she was insane. Somehow all that counted for nothing. He had divorced her, not the other way around. He was the man, she was the woman. For that Dan and Linda Broderick somehow deserved to be shot to death in their bedroom. The misandry of those callers was so thick it practically dripped out of my car speakers.
It was the first time in my life that I heard a group of people wholeheartedly endorse first-degree murder.
Berry Broderick was also supported by the feminist press, which included Los Angeles Times reporter Amy Wallace. Wallace's coverage of the case was sickeningly biased.
The experience opened my eyes and gave me a push toward conservatism.
You think this is funny?
At least in the United States, her actions would be considered assault and battery. It is illegal to perform surgery without the patient's informed consent.
Intentionally and with malice, causing permanent loss or impairment of a body part (which includes teeth) has committed the crime of maiming. Depending on severity, under the US Code, the person faces up to 20 years.
Far more appropriate than three years.
Three to five years would be appropriate for the teeth episode. Twenty would be more appropriate for more severe maimings like blinding, making somebody a paraplegic, etc.
I was referring to the range. Up to three years sounds inadequate to me, up to twenty years sounds more like it, especially if, as I have heard, the maximum sentence is rarely imposed.
In a civil suit. The DA filed charges agaunst the doc..he ultimately copped a plea..probation, community service..to avoid jailtime..but by admitting guilt..he had no defense..she sued him for everything...and he just turned it over..Sorry for the confusion in not explaining it more carefully..
Oh,OK...I thought you were saying that she won it in *divorce* court.Yah,civil suit...assault...I can see the guy being cleaned out by a judge or jury.
Her criminal behavior is his fault?
Yes. He’s a dumbass. Would you let an ex put you out and extract incisors? Not a chance!!!
Enough of these toothless attacks on a fine medical professional!
Not all ex-girlfriends would extract their ex-boyfriend’s teeth out.
She made that choice. She could have asked someone else to tend to her ex-boyfriend’s dental care. She chose to engage in criminal behavior.
Blaming the victim is unconservative.
Blah blah blah. Being a decider of poor choices is a common sense issue. Nothing to do with politics. Some people are morons. Who in their right mind would subject themselves to this possibility? Let’s be real here. Apparently some on Fr are not in touch with reality. Hell hath no....
His actions do not constitute a criminal offense. Hers do.
She was the fool—she didn’t care what the consequences were, so long as she got “revenge”.
Let the left blame the victim. Conservatives are above that behavior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.