Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tim McCarver: Global Warming Increasing the Number of Home Runs ( so it's not steroids?)
NewsBusters ^ | 4/28/2012 | Noel Sheppard

Posted on 04/29/2012 10:48:15 AM PDT by Signalman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Churchillspirit

Chance of a shower here and there, but they should get the game in.


41 posted on 04/29/2012 2:02:34 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Tim is nuts! Everyone knows baseball players are all aliens today! What other explanation fits all the facts?


42 posted on 04/29/2012 2:15:35 PM PDT by Da Bilge Troll (Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

One too many foul balls to the noggin for Tim


43 posted on 04/29/2012 2:36:29 PM PDT by archaicoldschool (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

So then global warming stopped 11-12 years ago? That’s when home run totals began falling dramatically. Of course, the crackdown on steroid use has had no impact whatsoever...


44 posted on 04/29/2012 5:38:48 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

AH Maybe it is roids are increasing the Homers. Explain me how Pujols has no homers yet?


45 posted on 04/29/2012 6:55:32 PM PDT by Mozilla (Constitution Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

AH Maybe it is roids are increasing the Homers. Explain me how Pujols has no homers yet?


46 posted on 04/29/2012 6:55:49 PM PDT by Mozilla (Constitution Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Tim McCarver: Global Warming Increasing the Number of Home Runs ( so it's not steroids?)

Global warming is increasing the number of nutty things whacked-out delusional people are attributing to global warming--wait a second, okay, I'm still possibly out of that section on a standard Venn diagram of what I'm positing.
47 posted on 04/29/2012 7:05:40 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
"Ruth"

I read the book "The Year Ruth Hit 104 Homeruns" by Bill Jenkinson. Ruth last played in 1935. The year that he supposedly would have hit 104 homeruns, if the fences were the same distance they are now, was 1921. Since that time, no player has come close to the distances Ruth achieved on his homeruns as tabulated by Jenkinson. Todays sluggers have weight training, hitting coaches, film, and uh steroids. Ruth trained on fatty foods, stogies, and liquor.

48 posted on 04/29/2012 7:28:31 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: driftless2

Babe would have hit more home runs, if only he cut down on the smoking, and the drinking, and the sex....especially between the innings.


49 posted on 04/29/2012 7:44:18 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
Although it is counter intuitive to most of us, at the same altitude, the fact is a baseball (or golf ball or whatever) will travel further on hot, humid days than on cooler, less humid days. The air is actually thinner under the hot, humid conditions than in dryer, low humidity conditions. It took an aircraft pilot to explain the air-density / altitude stuff to me. For pilots, it's a real big deal.

McCarver is also an idiot for buying the global warming crap, but the fact remains that in the same ball park you will see more home runs under high humidity conditions than in low humidity conditions. The air is actually thinner when the humidity is high.

Read more about it here.

50 posted on 04/29/2012 8:02:14 PM PDT by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I forgot to mention today’s players are trained in nutrition as well. Ruth probably thought he was malnourished if he didn’t eat three large steaks, a dozen eggs, a few loaves of bread, and whatever booze available to wash it down with at a single sitting. I figure all generations of pros have succumbed to the temptations of the flesh equally i.e. Tiger Woods. Although even Woods most likely wouldn’t have matched Ruth in the debauchery department.


51 posted on 04/30/2012 5:01:31 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson