Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boy vaccinated with Girls version of Gardasil...total pancreatic failure. Questions...

Posted on 05/01/2012 8:54:06 PM PDT by Mama Shawna

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-66 last
To: Kirkwood

You’re correct in that the FDA hasn’t approved Cervarix for boys, but that will most likely happen soon. I can’t imagine that it would be called “the girl’s vaccine” by any medical professional and I’m fairly certain that the result wouldn’t be an immediate re-vaccination with Gardasil.


51 posted on 05/02/2012 7:19:23 PM PDT by hocndoc (WingRight.org Have mustard seed, not afraid to use it. Hold R's to promises, don't watch O keep his.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Aqua225

I did not disagree with your comment. I was quoting from the Merck literature (also on their website) as to one of the reasons for using Gardasil for men.

You obviously believe Merck’s data. Fine. Since most of the clinical trials were run on women and not men I guess you have a slightly tougher row to hoe.

Perhaps you should dig deeper and not pretend to know everything


52 posted on 05/02/2012 9:05:03 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

My son’s pediatrician calls it juvenile diabetes and type 1.

They use both. In fact she specializes in kids with diabetes.


53 posted on 05/02/2012 9:22:04 PM PDT by JRochelle (Note to the MSM: Unemployment has been higher under every month of Obama than any month under Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Aqua225

“——————————————INDICATIONS AND USAGE ——————————————
GARDASIL is a vaccine indicated in girls and women 9 through 26 years of age for the prevention of the following diseases caused by Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types included in the vaccine:
• Cervical, vulvar, vaginal, and anal cancer caused by HPV types 16
and 18
• Genital warts (condyloma acuminata) caused by HPV types 6 and
11
And the following precancerous or dysplastic lesions caused by HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18:
• Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2/3 and Cervical
adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)
• Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 1
• Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) grade 2 and grade 3
• Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) grade 2 and grade 3
• Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) grades 1, 2, and 3
GARDASIL is indicated in boys and men 9 through 26 years of age for the prevention of the following diseases caused by HPV types included in the vaccine:
• Anal cancer caused by HPV types 16 and 18
• Genital warts (condyloma acuminata) caused by HPV types 6 and 11
And the following precancerous or dysplastic lesions caused by HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18:
• Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) grades 1, 2, and 3. (1)”

That is the direct quote from the Merck circular that addresses the uses and limitations of Gardasil.


54 posted on 05/02/2012 9:33:11 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

If your son’d doc is a pediatrician she is most definitely NOT an endocrinologist those are the specialists in the area. Yes I agree some docs do still use the term but it is not accurate and fell out of favor long ago whih is why you hear the terms Type 1 and insulin dependent.

But I think we strain mightily at a gnat’s eyelash.

Those with diabetes who need to take insulin shots to balance their sugars have challenges but they can lead full and wonderful lives.


55 posted on 05/02/2012 9:36:26 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mama Shawna; All
Boy vaccinated with Girls version of Gardasil...total pancreatic failure. Questions...

You're perpetrating a lie.

Is the same vaccine given to both females and males?

Yes, males will receive the same vaccine that females do. GARDASIL is given as 3 injections over 6 months. GARDASIL helps protect males and females ages 9 to 26 from 90% of genital warts cases. GARDASIL also helps protect females ages 9 to 26 from about 75% of cervical, 70% of vaginal, and up to 50% of vulvar cancer cases.
56 posted on 05/02/2012 9:50:09 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mama Shawna

“Has anyone out there heard or experienced someone who has received the shots, then contracted type 1 diabetes? My 14 year old daughter had two of the shots done, then two months later, she was diagnosed with diabetes. She was healthy, active through her school with sports. She had reported to me that another girl, healthy, active, in her school had just came down with diabetes as well, after receiving all three shots.”

EJ BRYANT of TN 11:52PM March 10, 2010

http://health.usnews.com/health-news/blogs/on-women/2009/08/20/gardasil-side-effects-tough-to-monitor/comments


57 posted on 05/02/2012 10:00:52 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mama Shawna

My blood went cold

posted by Marcia Turnquist on 5 Apr 2012 at 8:58 am

“My daughter developed type 1 diabetes AND antibodies against her thyroid in the months after receiving her last Gardasil vaccination. I have always suspected Gardasil as we have NO HISTORY of either of these diseases on EITHER side of the family. When I read at the end of this article that Merck (the maker of Gardasil) financed the study, my blood went cold.”

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/240897.php


58 posted on 05/02/2012 10:04:23 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mama Shawna

Lindsey on September 15, 2010 at 4:47 pm

“I received the shot in December of 2008 at the insistance of my family doctor. I was well outside the recomended age range at 29, but allowed myself to be badgered into it. By Febuary of 2009 I had developed full blown Type 1 diabetes. I had just had a full physical in November that included blood work and thus knew I was not diabetic or even pre-diabetic before the shot. Our family had never had a case of diabetes on either side. My heart goes out to everyone whose lives have been destroyed by Merck.”

http://truthaboutgardasil.org/injuries/


59 posted on 05/02/2012 10:12:58 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

I’m not ‘perpatrating’ anything. I asked a simple question of freepers based on info received from my customer about what happened to his son. How is that ‘perpatrating’ a lie? I know NOTHING about Gardasil, and knew I’d get good answers (pro and con) from Freepers.


60 posted on 05/03/2012 6:22:14 AM PDT by Mama Shawna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: cherry
why the hell should a 14 yro girl get this injection?....

What, you didn't get the Merk approved Rick Perry memo?

61 posted on 05/03/2012 6:35:18 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Conservatism is not a party slogan, but a mindset guided by core values and walking the walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

I don’t think there is anything wrong with that term.

You are the one who stated that doctors no longer use that term, I just disagreed.


62 posted on 05/03/2012 7:59:27 AM PDT by JRochelle (Note to the MSM: Unemployment has been higher under every month of Obama than any month under Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

I stated it because it is inaccurate and truly is NOT used by the specialists in the field. The fact that you can cite one peditircian is really not the same as saying all the docsw use it -—which is of course what you did


63 posted on 05/03/2012 12:26:10 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Diagnosed type 1 at 39. While my wife may call me juvenile, my doctor didn’t. Although, he did tell me that type 1 is what was commonly referred to as juvenile diabetes, just to educate me that there was no difference. I would have possibly thought that juvenile diabetes was a subset of type 1. From what I see, doctors are trying to get away from the juvenile diabetes label because, as I am proof, it isn’t always accurate. Although, since the vast majority of cases occur during childhood, I am sure that the term is still used.


64 posted on 05/03/2012 12:53:44 PM PDT by tnlibertarian (I <3 PEJSWDTDSOPC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: tnlibertarian

You are correct. The term is still used by some but most docs and specialists in the field use the other terms (Type 1 or insulin dependent).

You explained it perfectly and if your wife calls you juvenile I am sure it is always a term of endearment ;)


65 posted on 05/03/2012 2:16:44 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

You stated that is no longer used by doctors.

It is, by my son’s dr. and other specialists he has gone to. They usually use both terms. Type 1 or juvenile.

You really don’t know what you are talking about. That is why I called you out. Yes, some may no longer use that term but lots do.


66 posted on 05/03/2012 2:31:34 PM PDT by JRochelle (Note to the MSM: Unemployment has been higher under every month of Obama than any month under Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson