Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Twin Sisters who Share a HUSBAND (and hes also Married to Their C0usin)
Daily Mail ^

Posted on 05/05/2012 10:18:19 AM PDT by nickcarraway

From their brunette hair to their dress sense, twin sisters Vicki and Valerie Darger have a number of things in common.

But the 42-year-olds share more than just their looks - they are both married to the same man.

The sisters are in a polygamous marriage with Joe, 43, who is also wed to a third woman - their cousin Alina. The Dargers, who are fundamentalist Mormons from Salt Lake City, Utah, live together in a large family home and have 24 children between them.

Vicki, currently a stay-at-home mother, has been married to Joe, who runs a construction company, for 22 years. Valerie joined the family as his third wife in 2000.

In the eyes of their Fundamentalist Mormon religion, all three women are equally married to Joe.

They each have their own bedroom, and Joe alternates between the three rooms each evening.

Valerie, who works in the family cleaning business with Alina, 43, said: 'The fact that Joe was married to Vicki didn't bother me at all. I took it as a sign he would be a good husband for me as well.

'As teenagers, Vicki and I liked some of the same guys. I thought it might even be good if we married the same man.'

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Religion; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: antimormon; antimormonbigotry; antimormonpropaganda; pervertpower; perverts; polygamy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 05/05/2012 10:18:24 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Disgusting


2 posted on 05/05/2012 10:21:37 AM PDT by wastedyears (There can be only one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Brings to mind Star Trek, Harry Mudd and Mudd's Women.
3 posted on 05/05/2012 10:24:59 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
In one of Eddie Izzard's shows (he's a *great* British comedian) he was making fun of the British Royal family and,in commenting on their lack of intelligence,he said "it's not a good idea for cousins to marry because when they do the IQ goes right down the toilet".

Wise words,I'd say.

4 posted on 05/05/2012 10:27:23 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Unlike Mrs Obama,I've Been Proud Of This Country My *Entire* Life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Get ready for one story after another about marriages like this ..from now until Nov....drip...drip...drip...


5 posted on 05/05/2012 10:28:12 AM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Where one man has three wives, two have no wife. Being married is what stabilizes a young ma and makes him a more productive member of society.

The excess males are doomed to being queers and cannon fodder, if history and biology are any indications.

But, what is mere history and science against the wisdom of the polygs?


6 posted on 05/05/2012 10:30:58 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I’ve had fantasies about twins, but they didn’t involve marrying them....


7 posted on 05/05/2012 10:33:31 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

“Twins Bazel TWINS!”


8 posted on 05/05/2012 10:33:56 AM PDT by Lawdoc (My dad married my aunt, so now my cousins are my brothers. Go figure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

As long as nobody is on any government aid I don’t care how these adults choose to order their lives. Neither should anyone else.


9 posted on 05/05/2012 10:35:45 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

Well, we’re not supposed to look at history, or think about whether polygamy or homosexual marriage or polyamory or any of that is good for society. We’re in an age where we say that consenting adults have virtually unlimited “rights” to do whatever the heck they want.

And, with the move towards homosexual marriage and possibly polygamy, we’re also saying that society and culture and government have to officially endorse whatever it is that these people want to do.

So while you make a good point about how you would have large numbers of men with no wives, and what impact would that have on society, the liberal thought process does not allow us to go there. Instead, the desires of the consenting adults who want to be polygamous is paramount.


10 posted on 05/05/2012 10:36:54 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: nickcarraway
> We hope that by talking about our way of life, polygamy will step closer to being an accepted lifestyle and the laws that criminalise it might change,' said Joe.

And THERE is the money quote, FRiends. Not enough that they're living illegally, they want the rest of us to ACCEPT IT and LEGALIZE IT.

What are the odds these folks are Romney fans???

"One famous Mormon is U.S. presidential hopeful Mitt Romney, whose father George W. Romney was born in 1907 in a settlement in Mexico that had been founded in the 1880s by Mormons fleeing American anti-polygamy laws. The last polygamist in Romney’s direct ancestry was his great-grandfather Miles Park Romney, who had three wives."
Pretty good, I'd say.

Three wives? That ought to be punishment enough... LOL

12 posted on 05/05/2012 10:40:25 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Paladin2

Joe is guilty. Must be more to the man than what meets the eye.


14 posted on 05/05/2012 10:45:55 AM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

You ain’t kiddin...how come bald guys weren’t cool 30 years ago?

(Admittedly I just came looking for the pics!)


15 posted on 05/05/2012 10:50:10 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

He must buy vitamin E by the case.

Like I said as long as they aren’t taking tax money, I couldnt care less.


16 posted on 05/05/2012 10:53:02 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

If you step back for a moment and look at the actual results numerically, what you’ve just described is what happens when women look to Big Daddy Government as their sugar daddy.

Obama’s little advert of “Julia” perfectly encapsulated this for us. There’s no husband in the picture.

So from a numerical results issue, if men who marry multiple wives can actually support their women and offspring without *any* transfer payments from Big Mack Sugar Daddy, I’d see it as an improvement over our current situation, with high out of wedlock birth rates swelling the ranks of the feral male population and huge increases in things like food stamp rolls, etc.


17 posted on 05/05/2012 10:54:13 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Americans were all wondering which perversion would be the next to demand acceptance.

If was between polygmay and lowering the age of consent (with anmial sex a long shot possibility.

Looks like we are getting our answer.


18 posted on 05/05/2012 10:54:28 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Point of order, they are not married to the same man.

They are pretending to be. Only one of them legally is, though.

The rest are just concubines with no civil, legal, or moral protections.


19 posted on 05/05/2012 10:57:13 AM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

“As long as nobody is on any government aid I don’t care how these adults choose to order their lives. Neither should anyone else.”

I care, because there are usually kids involved, often many kids, all of whom are American citizens.

These kids get the ingrown genetics over time. Also, the girls tend to get “married” earlier and earlier, and the boys get thrown away.

Real marriage is a protection for the most vulnerable in our society - children. The definition of marriage is of paramount importance.


20 posted on 05/05/2012 10:59:38 AM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson