Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nanosheet catalyst discovered to sustainably split hydrogen from water
http://phys.org ^ | 10 May 2012 | Provided by Brookhaven National Laboratory

Posted on 05/14/2012 7:04:30 AM PDT by Red Badger

Hydrogen gas offers one of the most promising sustainable energy alternatives to limited fossil fuels. But traditional methods of producing pure hydrogen face significant challenges in unlocking its full potential, either by releasing harmful carbon dioxide into the atmosphere or requiring rare and expensive chemical elements such as platinum.

Now, scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory have developed a new electrocatalyst that addresses one of these problems by generating hydrogen gas from water cleanly and with much more affordable materials. The novel form of catalytic nickel-molybdenum-nitride – described in a paper published online May 8, 2012 in the journal Angewandte Chemie International Edition – surprised scientists with its high-performing nanosheet structure, introducing a new model for effective hydrogen catalysis.

“We wanted to design an optimal catalyst with high activity and low costs that could generate hydrogen as a high-density, clean energy source,” said Brookhaven Lab chemist Kotaro Sasaki, who first conceived the idea for this research. “We discovered this exciting compound that actually outperformed our expectations.”

Goldilocks chemistry

Water provides an ideal source of pure hydrogen – abundant and free of harmful greenhouse gas byproducts. The electrolysis of water, or splitting water (H2O) into oxygen (O2) and hydrogen (H2), requires external electricity and an efficient catalyst to break chemical bonds while shifting around protons and electrons. To justify the effort, the amount of energy put into the reaction must be as small as possible while still exceeding the minimum required by thermodynamics, a figure associated with what is called overpotential.

For a catalyst to facilitate an efficient reaction, it must combine high durability, high catalytic activity, and high surface area. The strength of an element’s bond to hydrogen determines its reaction level – too weak, and there’s no activity; too strong, and the initial activity poisons the catalyst.

“We needed to create high, stable activity by combining one non-noble element that binds hydrogen too weakly with another that binds too strongly,” said James Muckerman, the senior chemist who led the project. “The result becomes this well-balanced Goldilocks compound – just right.”

Unfortunately, the strongest traditional candidate for an electrocatlytic Goldilocks comes with a prohibitive price tag.

Problems with platinum

Platinum is the gold standard for electrocatalysis, combining low overpotential with high activity for the chemical reactions in water-splitting. But with rapidly rising costs – already hovering around $50,000 per kilogram – platinum and other noble metals discourage widespread investment.

“People love platinum, but the limited global supply not only drives up price, but casts doubts on its long-term viability,” Muckerman said. “There may not be enough of it to support a global hydrogen economy.”

In contrast, the principal metals in the new compound developed by the Brookhaven team are both abundant and cheap: $20 per kilogram for nickel and $32 per kilogram for molybdenum. Combined, that’s 1000 times less expensive than platinum. But with energy sources, performance is often a more important consideration than price.

Turning nickel into platinum

In this new catalyst, nickel takes the reactive place of platinum, but it lacks a comparable electron density. The scientists needed to identify complementary elements to make nickel a viable substitute, and they introduced metallic molybdenum to enhance its reactivity. While effective, it still couldn’t match the performance levels of platinum.

“We needed to introduce another element to alter the electronic states of the nickel-molybdenum, and we knew that nitrogen had been used for bulk materials, or objects larger than one micrometer,” said research associate Wei-Fu Chen, the paper’s lead author. “But this was difficult for nanoscale materials, with dimensions measuring billionths of a meter.”

The scientists expected the applied nitrogen to modify the structure of the nickel-molybdenum, producing discrete, sphere-like nanoparticles. But they discovered something else.

Subjecting the compound to a high-temperature ammonia environment infused the nickel-molybdenum with nitrogen, but it also transformed the particles into unexpected two-dimensional nanosheets. The nanosheet structures offer highly accessible reactive sites – consider the surface area difference between bed sheets laid out flat and those crumpled up into balls – and therefore more reaction potential.

Using a high-resolution transmission microscope in Brookhaven Lab’s Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Department, as well as x-ray probes at the National Synchrotron Light Source, the scientists determined the material’s 2D structure and probed its local electronic configurations.

“Despite the fact that metal nitrides have been extensively used, this is the first example of one forming a nanosheet,” Chen said. “Nitrogen made a huge difference – it expanded the lattice of nickel-molybdenum, increased its electron density, made an electronic structure approaching that of noble metals, and prevented corrosion.”

Hydrogen future

The new catalyst performs nearly as well as platinum, achieving electrocatalytic activity and stability unmatched by any other non-noble metal compounds. “The production process is both simple and scalable,” Muckerman said, “making nickel-molybdenum-nitride appropriate for wide industrial applications.”

While this catalyst does not represent a complete solution to the challenge of creating affordable hydrogen gas, it does offer a major reduction in the cost of essential equipment. The team emphasized that the breakthrough emerged through fundamental exploration, which allowed for the surprising discovery of the nanosheet structure.

“Brookhaven Lab has a very active fuel cell and electrocatalysis group,” Muckerman said. “We needed to figure out fundamental approaches that could potentially be game-changing, and that’s the spirit in which we’re doing this work. It’s about coming up with a new paradigm that will guide future research.”

Additional collaborators on this research were: Anatoly Frenkel of Yeshiva University, Nebojsa Marinkovic of the University of Delaware, and Chao Ma, Yimei Zhu and Radoslav Adzic of Brookhaven Lab.

More information: Scientific Paper: “Hydrogen-Evolution Catalysts Based on Non-Nobel Metal Nickel–Molybdenum Nitride Nanosheets”


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: automobile; energy; fuel; hydrogen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

This magnified image from a transmission electron microscope reveals details of the unexpected nanosheet structure of the nickel-molybdenum-nitride catalyst, seen here as dark, straight lines.

1 posted on 05/14/2012 7:04:41 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Cars that run on water, coming soon.


2 posted on 05/14/2012 7:09:12 AM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
..by releasing harmful carbon dioxide into the atmosphere..

I stopped reading at this point.

3 posted on 05/14/2012 7:10:17 AM PDT by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Platinum is the gold standard for electrocatalysis

That seems an unfortunate way to phrase it.

Turning nickel into platinum

So, alchemy, is it?

4 posted on 05/14/2012 7:10:46 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Like Emmett Till, Trayvon Martin has become simply a stick with which to beat Whites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

If it becomes a viable alternative energy source,

you can be sure the leftist/environmentalist/communists will find a way to shut it down.


5 posted on 05/14/2012 7:10:58 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Nanosheet catalyst discovered to sustainably split hydrogen from water

And Headline Writer to Awkwardly Split Infinitives

6 posted on 05/14/2012 7:15:06 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thommas

So you’re a Doubting Thommas?...............


7 posted on 05/14/2012 7:15:31 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

First of all, hydrogen isn’t an energy source. It is a way of storing energy.

Second, before hydrogen can be used as a fuel, we need a portable way of storing over a long period of time. Currently, a hydrogen tank in a car that gave the vehicle the same range as current gas tanks would be huge and cut into passenger and cargo space.


8 posted on 05/14/2012 7:16:12 AM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

That’s easy.
Hydrogen and oxygen recombine to make water vapor, which is a hundred times more powerful of a ‘greenhouse gas’ than CO2, ergo it must be stopped............


9 posted on 05/14/2012 7:17:46 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Water is a pretty safe way to store hydrogen...........


10 posted on 05/14/2012 7:18:48 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost

It wasn’t awkward.
He did it rather well............


11 posted on 05/14/2012 7:21:51 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yeah, I thought of that.
They’ll finally admit that water vapor accounts for 98% of the greenhouse effect.

Human produced CO2 accounts for 0.117% of the greenhouse effect:

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html


12 posted on 05/14/2012 7:21:51 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Thommas

—I stopped reading at this point.—

If I stopped reading every article at the point where it made an assertion I disagreed with, I would read very little.


13 posted on 05/14/2012 7:22:07 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrB

They want us to live in caves.


14 posted on 05/14/2012 7:22:21 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost

...and so did you..........


15 posted on 05/14/2012 7:22:42 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide.


16 posted on 05/14/2012 7:22:54 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

They don’t want us to live, period, if we aren’t part of their global communist utopia.


17 posted on 05/14/2012 7:23:14 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

China has all the molybdenum.

Even with catalyst you have to spend more energy to split water than you get back burning H.


18 posted on 05/14/2012 7:24:27 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The Occupy crowd has apparently already done that........


19 posted on 05/14/2012 7:24:54 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Imagine being able to fill a tank with water, run it over a catalyst which separates the two, and then burning them, effectively recombining them, for power. Forget the tailpipe. It could almost be a closed loop system.

But when said that way, it comes across as a bit of a chemistry version of a perpetual motion machine.


20 posted on 05/14/2012 7:24:59 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson