Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

October Surprise this weekend?
Oct. 17, 2012 | vanity

Posted on 10/17/2012 9:47:19 AM PDT by Jedidah

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-239 next last
To: Terry Mross

Your theory doesn’t square with Psalm 83.

The nations that presently make threats toward Israel will all be neutralized in the Psalm 83 war, before the Trib.

The destruction of Jerusalem (AKA Babylon, Soddom, Egypt) will be done by Christ himself. (see Rev. 11)


181 posted on 10/18/2012 8:07:26 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer; SatinDoll

Try to stay focused, Brown Deer.

Obama naturalized as a U.S. Citizen in 1983. He has a valid Certificate of Naturalization on file with USCIS. That’s what makes him ineligible to be POTUS or VP.


182 posted on 10/18/2012 8:07:43 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (Gossip is Satan's talk radio.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Sven, thanks for the reply.

I had the impression from other posts that the Octsuprise folks were lefties, so I did not expect any help in exposing Obama from them.

I would love to be proven wrong in this case.

I noticed that one of the fuzzy docs had a round seal on it at the top left,
I wonder if this could be one such document.


183 posted on 10/18/2012 8:17:34 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: exit82

http://www.google.com/imgres?q=naturalization+certificate+1983&hl=en&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4PRFB_enUS486US486&biw=1280&bih=678&tbm=isch&tbnid=E1bzw5OgnavvnM:&imgrefurl=http://www.webanswers.com/politics/what-does-a-us-naturalization-certificate-look-like-4926fe&docid=GpYfhnbFPjBM5M&imgurl=http://www.webanswers.com/post-images/E/E1/5F952E9A-1115-1700-B16B119A05319CBC.jpg&w=500&h=453&ei=ZR6AUPLcN5C42QWntYCwBw&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=181&vpy=101&dur=1203&hovh=214&hovw=236&tx=155&ty=104&sig=110939165879927456850&page=1&tbnh=147&tbnw=162&start=0&ndsp=23&ved=1t:429,r:5,s:0,i:83


184 posted on 10/18/2012 8:27:22 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Raebie

Looks like the Harvard logo on that document now posted.

Document page 3...

Could it be proof of foreign aid?


185 posted on 10/18/2012 8:28:39 AM PDT by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen; exit82; Jedidah; LucyT

Not off to a good start - from the Lamb v. Obama docket:


10/15/2012 Order Denying Motion for Expedited Consideration of: Plaintiff’s Motion for Immediate Disclosure of Records Pertaining to Presidential Candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney ~ On October 11, 2012, Mr. Thomas Lamb filed a motion for expedited consideration of his motion for immediate disclosure of records. At a minimum, the motion is premature. Before the plaintiff’s motion could be considered, plaintiff must provide the court with legitimate Civil Rule 5 proof of service of the summons and complaint and the pending motions and supporting documents on defendants. Thus, the motion for expedited consideration is denied at this time. Lamb, Thomas A Case Motion #1 Motion for Expedited Consideration of: Plaintiff’s Motion for Immediate Disclosure of Records Pertaining to Presidential Candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney

10/17/2012
Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration for Expedited Consideration ~ On October 16, 2012, plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the court’s October 12, 2012, order denying expedited consideration of his motion for immediate disclosure of records. In its October 12, 2012, order the court required proof of service of the summons and complaint and the underlying motion and request for expedited consideration on the defendants Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Plaintiff’s basis for reconsideration is that he did serve the defendants. In fact, plaintiff has not perfected proper service on defendants. Civil Rule 4(d)(1) requires personal service of the summons and complaint on defendants. Civil Rule 4(h) provides for alternate service by mail if the mailing of the summons and complaint is done by registered or certified mail with restricted delivery to the defendant who must sign off on the return receipt. Plaintiff has not followed Civil Rule 4(d) or Civil Rule 4(h). There has been no personal service. Plaintiff’s service by mail was directed to ‘Romney for President” and “Obama for America.” These mailings are not proper service by mail under Alaska law. The motion for reconsideration is denied.

http://www.courtrecords.alaska.gov/eservices/home.page.8

Search by name Thomas Lamb or case number 3AN-12-09961CI


Also it is doubtful the cases he cites (Miller and Ryan) could apply. Neither applies to private personal records from an out-of-state source. Alaska Superior court can not order Hawaii DOH or Occidental or Columbia to release private records without going to court in their respective states and getting a court order. You are talking months maybe years before that could work through the system.

As it is this court doesn’t seem very interested in taking this case.


186 posted on 10/18/2012 8:28:46 AM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Aria; bgill

What is FP?

TD @TexasDarlinBlog

@OctSurprise Ooops, looks like the guys at FP out’d you. LOL


187 posted on 10/18/2012 8:41:10 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

That’s now.

What would one look like in the early 80s?


188 posted on 10/18/2012 8:43:58 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: rxsid; Kingosaurus

When did the 1040EZ come into existence?

Here is the 1982 version:

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/f1040ez—1982.pdf

It doesn’t look like the blurry image.


189 posted on 10/18/2012 8:45:56 AM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

http://www.google.com/search?q=naturalization+certificate&hl=en&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4PRFB_enUS486US486&prmd=imvns&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=Qh6AUNO1JYS_2QX3xYFo&sqi=2&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1280&bih=678#hl=en&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4PRFB_enUS486US486&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=naturalization+certificate+1983&oq=naturalization+certificate+1983&gs_l=img.3...26430.28804.0.29307.5.5.0.0.0.0.96.405.5.5.0.eesh..0.0...1.1.DoZC-wZVGfA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=c445a4436b029fbb&bpcl=35440803&biw=1280&bih=678


190 posted on 10/18/2012 8:50:14 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone; 4Zoltan

Thanks for the links and research.

It is a shame, but this is being shot down due to paperwork technicalities.

Unless this concerned a Republican candidate, then this faults would be overlooked.


191 posted on 10/18/2012 8:57:06 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Sven, one additional question. Did Obama/Soetoro naturalize from Indonesia? Or somewhere else?

Thanks.


192 posted on 10/18/2012 8:59:19 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: exit82

I agree with others I think the “surprise” is against Romney his draft deferments someone in Chicago leaked to these losers and they think its a game changer..the news has been around for months but they probably have a new twist on it..it might well be faked records like the NG records and some obamanut grabs the ball and runs with it to find out its fake....They need to ask themselves why would someone trust something like this to them? what do they offer that CNN and Crowley Chris mathews etc dont have? Accountability..but now they do since they are outed...


193 posted on 10/18/2012 9:15:56 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan; Kingosaurus

What does the year 1982 have to do with the twitter quote I posted?


194 posted on 10/18/2012 9:21:34 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Latest ‘fact’:

Mentioned in both the VP debate and the 2nd presidential debate. ‘Brief’

@OctSurprise


195 posted on 10/18/2012 9:22:49 AM PDT by Raebie (WS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Typo? Meant FR?


196 posted on 10/18/2012 9:33:34 AM PDT by Aria ( 2008 wasn't an election - it was a coup d'etat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

Given the comment about paying attention to the questions, plus the binders focus plus the news that Gloria Allred is about to drop a bombshell, I wonder if the whole Libya thing is a red herring/distraction to draw attention away from where the real surprise is going to come from.


197 posted on 10/18/2012 9:37:09 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

rs, I hope it is the deferments, because that is easily countered with Zippy’s faked Selective Service record.

Both Romney and Zippy did not serve, so what advantage or relevance could 45 years+ documents have now?

R&R should be ready for a college record dump, or to hammer Zippy on his college records, if Zippy’s campaign wants to go back to age 18-21 for the candidates.

And also neither Romney nor Ryan was a member of a choom gang, nor did R&R deal in illegal drugs or take cocaine.

The focus is on the future, and Zippy’s past performance indicates he is incapable of getting this nation to a brighter future—Romney is.

Hope R&R is prepared.


198 posted on 10/18/2012 9:39:31 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: lmr

There is a possibility this is a ruse designed to divert attention away from foreign affairs (ie Libya) between now and the debate.


199 posted on 10/18/2012 9:45:58 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: maggief

J Hop’s friend, Maro, really like this video, “The Mexican Mormon War - Part 1 | VICE News”

supposedly a video of the Mexican Cartels VS the Mormon Romney’s in Mexico.


200 posted on 10/18/2012 9:51:34 AM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson