Skip to comments.Question: Should President Romney Pardon Treasonist Barack Hussein Obama II, a.k.a. Barry Soetoro ?
Posted on 10/31/2012 5:35:02 AM PDT by Yosemitest
click here to read article
I want them water boarded.
Would you like to join in the fun ?
” - - - but you wouldn’t believe how much time in research went into putting this thread together, and editing and formating time. - - - “
Nope, I do believe, I do indeed believe!
Yours is fact-based reporting with lots of backup that the reader can review to understand what you based your opinions on. Fact, documentation and opinions. Great Job X 10 ! That’s why I bookmarked it!
FR should put you in the Best Thread of the Year Finals!
The Liberal Agenda Media, (LAM), has become polarized, and thus does not bother with the documentation, often uses heresay and/or assumptions instead of facts, and vomits out the opinions of the counterculture that they were taught at their College Of Opiate Lies, (COOL).
Yet, Democrats still worship at his feet. Its sickening.
Still think he should be water boarded.
But not the presidnt. unless he commits an actual close up crime, like personally murdering someone of such. Anything else would be trumpeted as Policy Differences or Political crime. The Democrats wold then use that excuse to imprison or kill any Republican president they replace. You heard the demands of leftists to arrest every Republican president that has served in your lifetime, no? a president is arrested after he steps down for his actions while president, a subsequent president dare not leave office. He will try like hell to be dictator-for-life and every change of office will have to be done violently. The nation does not deserve what punishing the president after he leaves office will bring on it.There is proper Impeachment and Removal while he is IN office. If that is not used then he must be left alone after he leaves office. That is why Nixon was instantly pardoned as Fords first act.
No one is above the law, no one. Not even the CEO of the US.
The Democrats wold then use that excuse to imprison or kill any Republican president they replace.. They could try, but would need to go through a court of law in a public trial. Anything less would be seen as what it is, a grab of power, a coup.
You heard the demands of leftists to arrest every Republican president that has served in your lifetime, no? I hear the demands of leftists all the time, so what?. They wish all republicans to burn in hell. I got news, ain't going to happen. I hear they will take our firearms, ain't going to happen. I hear a lot of crap. So what, only gets their throats sore.
a president is arrested after he steps down for his actions while president, a subsequent president dare not leave office.The one has nothing to do with the other. If a president is breaking the law, he needs to be arrested, and prosecuted, in a court of law.(the one who leaves office, as there is procedure as you are aware of in office legal action.)
He will try like hell to be dictator-for-life and every change of office will have to be done violently.I do not see the cause and effect, I do not see that jump as a foregone conclusion. Take deep breaths, relax, and think about what you are putting forth as inevitable action. not gonna happen.
There is proper Impeachment and Removal while he is IN office. If that is not used then he must be left alone after he leaves office.
Unless he broke the law. If so, or sufficient evidence via grand jury, he needs to stand trial, regardless of party.
That is why Nixon was instantly pardoned as Fords first act.
Not so. Nixon was brought down in a bloodless coup, orchestrated by the media and the democratic party, and public opinion of the gullible, shaped by the same media. The public swallowed the whole thing. Once he was out of office, the dems had no interest, except for the buzzards. It would have been better to prosecute in a court of law, so the public would actually see just exactly what he was guilty of, and just exactly what was going on. ord's pardon was to sweep the whole thing under the rug.
Once we as a nation are fearful of prosecuting officials due to their rank, who decides who is above the law?
You are so tied up in a narrow as hell righteous view that you cannot even understand what I am driving at. It is plain words. There is no more way to get throughIt is like the conservatives who all cheered when Bush got his Homeland Security Act. I only saw that it seems good but Democrats are going to be in charge of it sooner then we think. What then? well, we are starting to find out “what then?”. We put a Democrat president in jail ooutside of the impeachment process. So far so good- he deserves it. Then the following Republican president will be followed by a DEMOCRAT president with a DEMOCRAT attorney general. He will put the Republican president in jail for whatever they can dream up and there is no recourse. Do you think a good man would even run for the Republican nomination after that? The whole political system would turn quickly into a 1960s Latin American Caudillo system where the only people who would run for president are those who think they can grab the system and stay there until they die. It is the only attitude that makes existential sense. But you won’t see any of that. You only think that this president has committed crimes and must be sent to prison. If he has committed crimes, judicial or political, impeach him while he is in office. Don’t destroy the Republic by hounding him after he leaves office. If your own immediate satisfaction is more important than the survival of the Republic, well, there is no helping you or discussing with you.
Carry on, and good luck in everything you do.
Wow, you were not only counting your chickens before they were hatched, you had the rotisserie all ready and the fires lit - but chickens don’t hatch from rotten eggs!
Benghazi-Coward Obama Impeachment File.
My two cents:
To date, the media havent asked President Obama and his top officials, why? Why the administration-wide cover-up? Why didnt military help get to Battleground Benghazi?
IMHO, Benghazi-Coward Obama chose Susan Rice to be the perfect deflecting smokescreen for his Impeachable blunders in the Benghazi Massacre.
Susan Rice is female, Black, and above all Had nothing to do with Benghazi.
Why not ignore Obamas throwing Rice at the gullible RINOs, and call Commie Obama to testify under oath to a Congressional Committee?
Here are my three questions for Benghazi-Coward Obama:
1.) Are you HIDING INFORMATION from the US Congress about the Benghazi Massacre?
2.) Have you been LYING to the US Congress, The Media, or the American Public about the Benghazi Massacre?
3.) Were you, as Commander in Chief, GROSSLY NEGLIGENT about your responsibilities to protect and assist those four Americans who subsequently were murdered in the Benghazi Massacre?
Impeach! IMPEACH! IMPEACH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.