Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court to hear case on Obama's alleged forged documents (Photos) ^ | Jan 10, 2012 | Marc Dumon

Posted on 01/11/2013 4:44:07 AM PST by voicereason

On Wednesday, Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court scheduled a birther case brought on by Orly Taitz which calls into question Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to be president of the United States. Dr. Taitz, a lawyer from Santa Margarita, Calif., also made the announcement on her website on Jan. 9. As of this writing, major news networks such as ABC, Fox News, CBS, and NBC have yet to report on the high court's decision to review Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to hold political office in the United States or any of its territories. The case is identified as Edward Noonan, et al., v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State. On Feb. 15, all nine justices will hear arguments on whether Obama used forged government documents and fake identification in order to get elected as commander-in-chief. Edward Noonan, et al., contend that if Obama had been ineligible to run in 2008, other Democratic candidates should have replaced him on the presidential ballot. Additionally, electoral votes from states such as California that went towards Obama should have been deemed null and void. Continued at source....

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; taitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-182 next last
To: voicereason

To prevent duplication, please do not alter the published headline, thx.

61 posted on 01/11/2013 10:05:51 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Thanks. I’m aware of Malloy’s call for mass killing of birthers, etc.

I consider the source. He’s an ass.

I have never been directly called a “Birther” but if someone wants to use it toward me as a pejorative that’s okay.

My response will be to ask them three questions:

1. Why is it that EVERY young American upon entering the United States Military is subjected to an Entrance National Agency Check (ENTNAC)?

2. Why is it that US Military Officers, usually above the grade/rate O-3, are subjected to a Special Scope Background Investigation (SSBI) in order to work on operational projects?

3. How can a man such as Obama rise to the level of “Commander In Chief” and appropriate authorities not know that he was not Constitutionally Eligible for that responsibility or that of President?

62 posted on 01/11/2013 10:21:59 AM PST by Joe Marine 76 ("It's The Natural Born Citizenship, Stupid!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

Maybe the Supreme Court has come to the conclusion that it’s really not good for the country if half the country believes their President is a fraud — not good at all.

63 posted on 01/11/2013 10:26:05 AM PST by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Triple

Instead of being a shot across the bow, I pray it’s a full spread of torpedoes below the water line. I hope it sinks the usurper. Alas, though, it won’t.

64 posted on 01/11/2013 10:36:08 AM PST by NCC-1701 (The LEFT's intolerance of the RIGHT is intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

How does one contact Malloy to let him know that the HI state registrar has certified a letter of verification which confirms that Obama’s HI BC is legally non-valid?

65 posted on 01/11/2013 10:52:40 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

It says application for review will be seen by all justices,does say anything about hearing the case

66 posted on 01/11/2013 10:57:09 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“The Alinsky tactic only works BECAUSE the “conservatives” mock the issue.”

That is absolutely correct. As you stated we have no idea what type of threats have been sent their way or toward their families, but to participate in the mocking when a valid issue is addressed makes them an accomplice. Thanks for your post. I believe every word of it. I feel completely powerless, in fact numb, I know he is an illegitimate president, the enemy within, as well as those he has surrounded himself with. Conservative radio and news has become a joke for some time now. The real issues are not even close to being touched. When you really think about it, it is a shocker that he made it to the top position in American politics. The whole system has become a sewer of corruption and bold in your face communists.

67 posted on 01/11/2013 11:05:21 AM PST by selfdefense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Indeed, I am arguing with idiots.

68 posted on 01/11/2013 11:14:43 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
"eligibility is not a political issue"

That's correct.

The Constitution mandates certain requirements for national political office.

Whether one meets those requirements for the office they seek/hold, is hardly a political issue.

69 posted on 01/11/2013 11:22:49 AM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Ne disrespect meant by this, but I will judge that for myself.

70 posted on 01/11/2013 11:27:03 AM PST by Matthew10 (You can't use what you don't know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

That inner conflict, eh?

Those who have facts to argue usually argue them; those who don’t usually resort to ad hominems.

71 posted on 01/11/2013 11:48:50 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Based on the info below, it appears that it was out-right refused by Kennedy and accepted for conference by Roberts. So if nothing else, there is a minor victory here:

Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.

So of the 10,000 petitions for certiorori, how many are refused out-of-hand and how many are referred to conference. I would suppose the number that reach conference are significantly below the 10K number you suggest...

72 posted on 01/11/2013 12:23:11 PM PST by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Butter -

Is it true that Obama and his “legal team” have NEVER brought into evidence, in any legal proceeding, his birth certificate or COLB or any other proof of birth? I seem to remember that this was done by the plaintiffs in Georgia and Florida but I don’t believe Obama’s people have ever offered it up in a court of law. And even in the cases where the plaintiffs have brought it forward, I don’t know that it was ever admitted as evidence...

73 posted on 01/11/2013 12:41:40 PM PST by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: visually_augmented

It’s never been admitted as evidence.

There was one case, I think with Judge David Carter presiding, where Obama’s counsel asked the judge to “notice” that Factcheck claimed to have seen the real physical short-form. That was the closest Obama’s people ever came to presenting ANY evidence. At least as far as I know, but I haven’t kept up on all the lawsuits very well.

74 posted on 01/11/2013 12:44:53 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

we have run out of the soap box and the ballot box this maybe last chance at jury box before the cartridge box...if we the people dont have standing to challenge our President we have nothing....we are subjects not citizens.

75 posted on 01/11/2013 12:50:59 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

This wasn’t admitted as evidence, either.

76 posted on 01/11/2013 1:17:28 PM PST by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: voicereason
For what it's worth and not sure if this even applies or is accurate in it's assessment of the procure.

Distributed for Conference at the Supreme Court of the United States

Published on October 25, 2012 by Roy I. Liebman, Esq.
Filed under Supreme Court of the United States

Every petition that is docketed at the U.S. Supreme Court, and remains on the docket, will eventually be distributed for a conference, usually held on a Friday. The date of the conference depends upon whether or not the Court is in session, in recess or on vacation. (There were 39 conferences during the 2011 Term.) Does this mean the Court will discuss each petition distributed during their conference? Absolutely not! Although this is a very closely guarded secret, I would estimate that, at best, only 20-25% of the petitions distributed for a given conference are actually discussed during that conference and few, if any, of those discussed, are granted. Those which aren’t discussed, become automatically denied.

The process is quite simple. Each week of the year, the clerk’s office distributes petitions, due for distribution to the justices’ chambers, for a conference, which is generally held, if the Court is in session, 2½ weeks later. Each chamber receives a copy of each petition. However, in 1972, the Court instituted a pooling system whereby each justice, who participates in the pool, is only responsible for his or her proportionate number of petitions distributed. Currently, eight justices participate in the pool, so his or her chambers are only responsible for 1/8th of the petitions and the 9th justice (currently Justice Alito) is responsible for reviewing all petitions distributed. For those justices participating in the pool, the petitions are read by one of the four law clerks typically found in each of the justices’ chambers. Each of them writes a memo as to each petition he or she read that summarizes the petition with a recommendation as to whether or not the petition is cert-worthy. These pool memos are then distributed to the participating justices. Prior to the conference, the Chief Justice circulates a “discuss list” containing any petitions he deems worthy of further discussion. Each justice can add to the list any petition he or she deems worthy. Very few, if any, petitions on the discuss list are granted. The remaining petitions, as I have stated, are automatically denied.

end snip, more at link

77 posted on 01/11/2013 1:39:43 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: deport
Link for the above citation in post #77:

Distributed for Conference at the Supreme Court of the United States

78 posted on 01/11/2013 1:42:08 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
“Obama is entitled to be President, and in fact, we hereby rule that he is eligible for more terms. We officially dissolve the 22nd Amendment.”

Oh, and here's another tax...

79 posted on 01/11/2013 1:46:05 PM PST by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: deport

Case Distribution Schedule -- October Term 2012 (PDF)

80 posted on 01/11/2013 1:47:42 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson