Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court to hear case on Obama's alleged forged documents (Photos)
Examiner.com ^ | Jan 10, 2012 | Marc Dumon

Posted on 01/11/2013 4:44:07 AM PST by voicereason

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last
To: voicereason

Reberts?????
Well...........
THE
FIX
IS
IN!


21 posted on 01/11/2013 6:18:55 AM PST by Flintlock (PARANOIA--means having all the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Thanks for the “reality” perspective. It was truly needed.

The SCOTUS will not undo the will of the voters. Roberts has already made that clear in the ObamaCare decision.

In Roberts’ mind, an election can alter, amend or negate any or all of the US Constitution.


22 posted on 01/11/2013 6:36:20 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Bread and Circuses; Everyone to the Coliseum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Matthew10
I have got to meet this lady.

I like her as well, and admire her to sticking to principle even after so many failed hearings. I watched her presentation in Atlanta ... she is a terrible trial lawyer. Her presentation could have been bested by any high school student. She desperately needs to seek help in order to gain some trial skills.

23 posted on 01/11/2013 6:37:07 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Flavious_Maximus

That is the thing about blackmail - you can spend it, but then you still have it.

I am going to give away the blackmail on Roberts...

IMO, pictures on the internet show that he has had several gay relationships.

There, now everyone knows...


24 posted on 01/11/2013 6:43:35 AM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Roberts has been pwned since at least 2005 when the NYT went quiet after supposedly investigating his South American adoptions.

I’m wondering which other cases he’s mishandled.


25 posted on 01/11/2013 6:45:37 AM PST by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

something to pray for


26 posted on 01/11/2013 6:47:06 AM PST by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs
I wish you were wrong about that, but the momentum seems to support your prediction.

None the less, I remain somewhat optimistic. We'll just have to wait and see how it plays out.

Interesting times...

27 posted on 01/11/2013 6:52:49 AM PST by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: selfdefense

The Alinsky tactic only works BECAUSE the “conservatives” mock the issue. Which is why Soros threatened the conservative media into first ignoring the issue (in October of 2008 and again within the first few months after the election) and later (when the issue could no longer be ignored) into mocking it. There’s documentation that threats have been made against anybody who would report credibly on Obama’s ineligibility. Mike Zullo of the Cold Case Posse confirmed to me that one of Doug Hagmann’s sources left the country in fear for her life.

The day that Arpaio had his first press conference, everybody was instead reporting on the death of Andrew Breitbart - who dropped dead to the ground less than 5 hours after calling Arpaio to ask about his evidence and telling Arpaio that his evidence was good (Breitbart had previously refused to report on the eligibility issue because he said the evidence was not good enough). The initial reports had Breitbart’s father-in-law saying he knew of no heart problems, and the coroner’s office (after having looked at his medical records) initially said he had not seen a doctor within the past year. Then the stories started changing, with colleagues claiming he had had a massive heart attack 6 months ago and had been in the hospital for 2 weeks. And yet the coroner’s report found no medicines within his system. The coroner’s office - in which one of the workers got violently sick the day before the Breitbart autopsy was due to come out, and died of what police suspected to be arsenic poisoning the actual day the autopsy came out - did not check for the only sign of a potassium chloride “assassination” dart - a small red entry hole that could appear anywhere on the body.

Also on the day of Arpaio’s first press conference, Rush Limbaugh received what his office treated as a bomb threat - a package alluding to 2 famous assassinations.

Limbaugh and Breitbart are the 2 voices either independent (Breitbart) or too large to be totally silenced by the (Clear Channel) company that had been threatened regarding Obama’s eligibility, and BOTH were hit on the day of Arpaio’s press conference - one with a package alluding to assassinations that shook him up, and the other with instant death.

Strangely enough (sarc), none of the “mainstream” media nor so-called “conservatives” reported on the evidence cited by Arpaio in his press conference announcing probable cause for forgery and the commencement of a criminal investigation of the issue.

2008 was literally a coup, complete with crimes - including the death threats and assassinations - that a coup requires.

Right now I have a criminal case against DNC Counsel Bob Bauer, who was informed by Attorney Larry Klayman (4 days before the DNC Convention began) that HI registrar Alvin Onaka had issued a certified verification to AZ SOS Ken Bennett in which he was required to verify any submitted birth fact that he can lawfully say was the way the event happened - and in which Onaka verified NONE of Obama’s birth facts. The only lawful reason for this to be the case is if the HI BC itself is not legally valid. Because there is no legally-valid HI BC, Obama has no legally-established birth facts and NOBODY can lawfully (without committing perjury and/or fraud) certify that he is qualified/eligible to be POTUS. Bauer ignored that and counseled Villagairosa and Germond to sign what Bauer knew to be a fraudulent/perjurious Official Certification of Nomination. That’s subornation of perjury. And Bauer submitted that perjurious OCON to almost every state SOS in order to get Obama’s name on the ballot. That’s election fraud. My criminal complaint accuses Bauer of subornation of perjury and of election fraud.

I informed the offices of every Republican member of Congress that every electoral vote Obama got is legally acknowledged as being the result of fraud. I informed them of Onaka’s disclosure that Obama’s HI BC is legally non-valid.

EVERY COTTON-PICKING SECRETARY either forwarded my fax to my 2 legislators (Rep Adrian Smith and/or Mike Johanns) or else threw it away. IOW, unless every state has somebody like me who works full-time on investigating this issue (while maintaining 2 part-time jobs and a family of 6), the other Congress-critters just have no choice but to be ignorant a$$holes.

I wonder if I had sent a fax notifying every Republican Congressman that there was going to be a bomb at the Capitol on Jan 6th, whether the fax would be taken seriously, or whether it would thrown out and/or forwarded to Smith and Johanns’ office since I am their constituent. I bet you they would scurry to defend their own fat a$$es. When it’s the whole country that is being held at knife-point, it’s not worth worrying about - pass the buck to 2 Congress-critters. And that is why I have no respect for ANY of them. None. They care about one thing and one thing only: themselves. Period.

The death of America is blood on their hands.


28 posted on 01/11/2013 6:59:02 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Yes, they are that stupid. That is why they follow Orly Taitz. Then again, I could almost see the Supreme Court taking the case for the sheer laugh-factor...the thought of Orly Taitz arguing a case in front of Scalia boggles the mind!


29 posted on 01/11/2013 7:03:02 AM PST by Mr Rogers (America is becoming California, and California is becoming Detroit. Detroit is already hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Are you people this naive, this stupid about Supreme Court procedures to believe there is anything significant about the mere conferencing of this case? Nearly every one of the thousands of petitions for certiorori (requests to the SCOTUS to hear a case) that are filed each year are “considered” by the nine justices at their weekly conference. At these conferences, the justices summarily reject the overwhelming vast majority of cases without discussion....


So how do the SC justices WHICH cases to consider? They must have some type of impact or weight on our legal system/constitution then to be considered.

Would you not consider a case dealing with the eligibility of the highest public office in the land to merit consideration over thousands of other cases?


30 posted on 01/11/2013 7:03:02 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Triple

I like your reasoning on this and pray your are correct.


31 posted on 01/11/2013 7:09:31 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
I wonder how many threats the Supreme Court judges are getting for even considering this case.

Someone said on the other thread, it only takes four judges to decide to take the case. Even though this is probably a setup to deny Orly her petition, at least Orly made it all the way to the Supreme Court. Good for her.

I've never figured out why the so called conservative talk show hosts and newspapers dismissed the possibility that Obama has been hiding his real birth certificate, when there is plenty of evidence that he is doing just that.

32 posted on 01/11/2013 7:17:41 AM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: Labyrinthos

>>and the SCOTUS agrees to hear only about 75 - 80 petitions (less that 1%) of the 10,000 it receives.<<

Do they all involve the pResident?


34 posted on 01/11/2013 7:21:15 AM PST by ILS21R (Everything is a conspiracy. No? You're living in one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Unfortunately, they’ve shown time and time again that they do not consider this to be a matter worthy of their attention.


35 posted on 01/11/2013 7:21:52 AM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Now you know: threats. From people who have claimed the authority to assassinate US citizens without any accountability, who have long had the capability of making an assassination look like a heart attack, aneurysm, etc, and who now have access to the medical records of every person in this country.

And these people could have carried out that very thing in full view of everyone in the case of Andrew Breitbart just hours after he approved of Arpario’s evidence of forgery from the White House. The initial stories and coroner’s results don’t fit any of the stories we were later told, and the coroner’s office ended up not even checking for the methods of assassination that would have been employed.

I believe there are now 2 affidavits from witnesses who were told that Bill Gwatney and Stephanie Tubbs were each killed in succession within a couple weeks of the 2008 DNC Convention, when they each in turn agreed to present a petition at the Convention challenging Obama’s eligibility. Gwatney by a supposedly-random shooter who ended up killed by police, and Tubbs by an “aneurysm”. And ultimately Hillary herself did not present the petition because she and Bill were told that Chelsea would be killed if they did.

2008 was literally a coup.


36 posted on 01/11/2013 7:29:14 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
“Yes, they are that stupid. That is why they follow Orly Taitz. Then again, I could almost see the Supreme Court taking the case for the sheer laugh-factor...the thought of Orly Taitz arguing a case in front of Scalia boggles the mind!”

My cut and paste didn't work correctly last time.

But the though is the same. No one really cares what you think.

37 posted on 01/11/2013 7:29:14 AM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

If this judge takes the case and makes the correct patriotic judgement then they will be national heros for saving millions of peoples lives.

Because we are on the eve of the Second revolution, people are not willing to wait for the gun grabbers and are in superior numbers.

We have a superior numerical advantage.

And we are pissed.

Remove the usurper or America will have its Revolution.


38 posted on 01/11/2013 7:33:31 AM PST by Eye of Unk (AR2 2013 is the American Revolution part 2 of 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Triple

You wrote: “Is this a shot across obama’s bow? If Obama is willing to violate the constitution and cause mass chaos with an executive order on gun control. The USSC can take him out on eligibility. They have been playing politics by not hearing the case. - to avoid chaos? Perhaps they see this as the easier choice now.”

For the record, I am a “Proud Birther” and have been since June 8, 2008 when the first forged “Certification of Live Birth” was presented by the Obama myrmidons.

I will be VERY surprised if the case goes to the full court for arguments. I pray it does.

Freepers, correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe the process here is that the Justices get a copy of the suit, read it and then “conference” and vote to bring it to the full Court for arguments. I have read previously that the “Rule of Four” for a “Writ of Certiorari” to bring it to the full Court is the requirement. That is, at least four Justices have to vote to hear the case in the full Court.

Two items to consider: 1. Justice Roberts has either been “bought” or is being blackmailed.

And, 2. The Supreme Court, I believe, will not go down the path of removing the first sitting black pResident.

The major cities would burn: Boston, New York City, Newark, Philly, Baltimore, DC, Atlanta, Miami, New Orleans, Detroit, Chicago, and LA, and on and on. Think about that. This is why I have always consider Obama to be THE current National Security Threat. We as a Nation are being held hostage by this Chicago Thug.

I, sadly, have been resigned to the fact that we have Obama for the duration.


39 posted on 01/11/2013 7:43:03 AM PST by Joe Marine 76 ("It's The Natural Born Citizenship, Stupid!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

And no one cares what Orly Taitz thinks, which is why this case won’t go anywhere. She’s a loon, and the justices are not going to vote to listen to her rantings.


40 posted on 01/11/2013 7:44:47 AM PST by Mr Rogers (America is becoming California, and California is becoming Detroit. Detroit is already hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson