Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Not seeing this reported anywhere else., nor on any of the news blogs....too good to be true?
1 posted on 01/11/2013 4:44:15 AM PST by voicereason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: voicereason

It is posted on the Supreme Court’s schedule:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm

No. 12A606
Title:
Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
v.
Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed: December 13, 2012
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S207078)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy (949) 683-5411
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent:
Kamala Harris Attorney General (916) 445-9555
P. O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State


2 posted on 01/11/2013 4:49:30 AM PST by voicereason (The RNC is the "One-night stand" you wish you could forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

Is this a shot across obama’s bow?

If Obama is willing to violate the constitution and cause mass chaos with an executive order on gun control. The USSC can take him out on eligibility.

They have been playing politics by not hearing the case. - to avoid chaos?

Perhaps they see this as the easier choice now.


3 posted on 01/11/2013 5:06:59 AM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

Wow. If nothing else I have to give huge props to Orly for being persistent in spite of being demonized by both the Left AND the Right.


4 posted on 01/11/2013 5:11:47 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Bathhouse Barry wants YOU to bend over for another four years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2976497/posts


6 posted on 01/11/2013 5:13:20 AM PST by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

7 posted on 01/11/2013 5:13:38 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason
Interesting. Very interesting. I'm not going to get my hopes up, especially considering this is John Robers' SCOTUS and he's the man who made obamacare constitutional.

Still...at least an eligibility case finally made it to the SC.

I wonder what data, poll numbers or ? they are looking at to move this forward now after ignoring it and the many court challenges around the country these last 4 or 5 years.

Do they fear the next few years as much as many of the rest of us do and are slowing things down with the rule of Constitutional law?

Or, are they planning to accelerate our slide into the abyss with some more Constitution shredding like with their obamacare ruling?

11 posted on 01/11/2013 5:39:21 AM PST by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

All they have to do is subpoena the so-called “birth certificate” and have it analyzed by forgery experts.


13 posted on 01/11/2013 5:57:40 AM PST by FroggyTheGremlim (Palin was correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

Roberts has been blackmailed. The case will end with the following judgement: “Obama is entitled to be President, and in fact, we hereby rule that he is eligible for more terms. We officially dissolve the 22nd Amendment.”


15 posted on 01/11/2013 6:05:54 AM PST by Lazamataz (LAZ'S LAW: As an argument with liberals goes on, the probability of being called racist approaches 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2976497/posts

I posted one thread. Its hard to find, since it got retitled and moved from Announcements to bloggers.


16 posted on 01/11/2013 6:09:05 AM PST by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason
Are you people this naive, this stupid about Supreme Court procedures to believe there is anything significant about the mere conferencing of this case? Nearly every one of the thousands of petitions for certiorori (requests to the SCOTUS to hear a case) that are filed each year are "considered" by the nine justices at their weekly conference. At these conferences, the justices summarily reject the overwhelming vast majority of cases without discussion.

To put this in prospective, in an average year, the SCOTUS receives about 10,000 petitons for certiorori, nearly all of the petitions are docketed for conference, nearly all of the cases that are docketed for conference are summarily denied based upon the staff recommendation, and the SCOTUS agrees to hear only about 75 - 80 petitions (less that 1%) of the 10,000 it receives.

17 posted on 01/11/2013 6:09:09 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

I have got to meet Dr. Orly Taitz, she has more balls than any male member of Congress, the courts or the SS.

I have got to meet this lady.


19 posted on 01/11/2013 6:09:33 AM PST by Matthew10 (You can't use what you don't know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

Reberts?????
Well...........
THE
FIX
IS
IN!


21 posted on 01/11/2013 6:18:55 AM PST by Flintlock (PARANOIA--means having all the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

something to pray for


26 posted on 01/11/2013 6:47:06 AM PST by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

If this judge takes the case and makes the correct patriotic judgement then they will be national heros for saving millions of peoples lives.

Because we are on the eve of the Second revolution, people are not willing to wait for the gun grabbers and are in superior numbers.

We have a superior numerical advantage.

And we are pissed.

Remove the usurper or America will have its Revolution.


38 posted on 01/11/2013 7:33:31 AM PST by Eye of Unk (AR2 2013 is the American Revolution part 2 of 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

This case involves forgery of government documents and fraud.

No mention is made of eligibility, natural born citizenship.

The crimes at issue are important, but they are enabling crimes for the great crime of ineligibility. They don’t want to touch eligibility because the political establishment has their fingerprints all over it. From Pelosi, state Democrat committees, SOSs, and judges (the Georgia Supreme Court, or more recently “Miracle on 34th St” judge Carroll - all of whom should be disbarred), there is enormous complicity.

If the case is heard I hope Taitz has the sense to enlist others and does not attempt to go it alone.


45 posted on 01/11/2013 8:19:09 AM PST by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

If this case is summarily dismissed, we are a nation of the personality cult, rather than a nation of laws.


46 posted on 01/11/2013 8:22:31 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

Unless I am mistaken, it takes an affirmative vote of four Justices to hear a case, and that does not mean they will vote in favor of anything.

I don’t believe that there are four Justices who wish to see this matter heard, but if there are, I believe it is because one of them wants to shoot this argument in the head.

They will do it on procedural grounds so that the merits are never reached, since it will then leave the door open for future interpretation.

This is nothing to get excited about. The only thing interesting is that Kennedy at first through it out, and then on second go round, it was accepted for conference. I think we know how Kennedy will vote on the case if it ever is heard before the court.


51 posted on 01/11/2013 8:38:00 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

What happens is these cases work their way up to the SCOTUS so to look fair they schedule them for conference. Then on Wed when the SCOTUS have their conference to decide which cases they will hear they always kick the birther case loose. That way it looks like they considered it.

In the past Justice Scalia has told Orly Taitz that it takes 4 justices to vote for a case in order for it to be heard. What he is telling her is that there are only 3 that are voting for these cases. My guess is that its Roberts who won’t vote to hear them.


56 posted on 01/11/2013 8:53:15 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

To prevent duplication, please do not alter the published headline, thx.


61 posted on 01/11/2013 10:05:51 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: voicereason

Maybe the Supreme Court has come to the conclusion that it’s really not good for the country if half the country believes their President is a fraud — not good at all.


63 posted on 01/11/2013 10:26:05 AM PST by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson