It is posted on the Supreme Court’s schedule:
Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed: December 13, 2012
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S207078)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy (949) 683-5411
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent:
Kamala Harris Attorney General (916) 445-9555
P. O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Is this a shot across obama’s bow?
If Obama is willing to violate the constitution and cause mass chaos with an executive order on gun control. The USSC can take him out on eligibility.
They have been playing politics by not hearing the case. - to avoid chaos?
Perhaps they see this as the easier choice now.
Wow. If nothing else I have to give huge props to Orly for being persistent in spite of being demonized by both the Left AND the Right.
Still...at least an eligibility case finally made it to the SC.
I wonder what data, poll numbers or ? they are looking at to move this forward now after ignoring it and the many court challenges around the country these last 4 or 5 years.
Do they fear the next few years as much as many of the rest of us do and are slowing things down with the rule of Constitutional law?
Or, are they planning to accelerate our slide into the abyss with some more Constitution shredding like with their obamacare ruling?
All they have to do is subpoena the so-called “birth certificate” and have it analyzed by forgery experts.
Roberts has been blackmailed. The case will end with the following judgement: “Obama is entitled to be President, and in fact, we hereby rule that he is eligible for more terms. We officially dissolve the 22nd Amendment.”
I posted one thread. Its hard to find, since it got retitled and moved from Announcements to bloggers.
To put this in prospective, in an average year, the SCOTUS receives about 10,000 petitons for certiorori, nearly all of the petitions are docketed for conference, nearly all of the cases that are docketed for conference are summarily denied based upon the staff recommendation, and the SCOTUS agrees to hear only about 75 - 80 petitions (less that 1%) of the 10,000 it receives.
I have got to meet Dr. Orly Taitz, she has more balls than any male member of Congress, the courts or the SS.
I have got to meet this lady.
something to pray for
If this judge takes the case and makes the correct patriotic judgement then they will be national heros for saving millions of peoples lives.
Because we are on the eve of the Second revolution, people are not willing to wait for the gun grabbers and are in superior numbers.
We have a superior numerical advantage.
And we are pissed.
Remove the usurper or America will have its Revolution.
This case involves forgery of government documents and fraud.
No mention is made of eligibility, natural born citizenship.
The crimes at issue are important, but they are enabling crimes for the great crime of ineligibility. They don’t want to touch eligibility because the political establishment has their fingerprints all over it. From Pelosi, state Democrat committees, SOSs, and judges (the Georgia Supreme Court, or more recently “Miracle on 34th St” judge Carroll - all of whom should be disbarred), there is enormous complicity.
If the case is heard I hope Taitz has the sense to enlist others and does not attempt to go it alone.
If this case is summarily dismissed, we are a nation of the personality cult, rather than a nation of laws.
Unless I am mistaken, it takes an affirmative vote of four Justices to hear a case, and that does not mean they will vote in favor of anything.
I don’t believe that there are four Justices who wish to see this matter heard, but if there are, I believe it is because one of them wants to shoot this argument in the head.
They will do it on procedural grounds so that the merits are never reached, since it will then leave the door open for future interpretation.
This is nothing to get excited about. The only thing interesting is that Kennedy at first through it out, and then on second go round, it was accepted for conference. I think we know how Kennedy will vote on the case if it ever is heard before the court.
What happens is these cases work their way up to the SCOTUS so to look fair they schedule them for conference. Then on Wed when the SCOTUS have their conference to decide which cases they will hear they always kick the birther case loose. That way it looks like they considered it.
In the past Justice Scalia has told Orly Taitz that it takes 4 justices to vote for a case in order for it to be heard. What he is telling her is that there are only 3 that are voting for these cases. My guess is that its Roberts who won’t vote to hear them.
To prevent duplication, please do not alter the published headline, thx.
Maybe the Supreme Court has come to the conclusion that it’s really not good for the country if half the country believes their President is a fraud — not good at all.