Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus

A PDF of a vital record (which is supposed to have a physically-raised seal and the certifying statements in order to be certified) would not be sufficient, and especially since Onaka has refused to verify what Bennett requested to be verified: that the PDF is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”. Onaka has, through silence, confirmed that the PDF is NOT “a true and accurate representation of the original record on file”.


91 posted on 01/11/2013 4:49:03 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

That will all be up to Judge Wingate to rule on.

Dr. Onaka is a named co-defendant in Taitz v Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committeee, et. al., as is Loretta Fuddy and Nancy Pelosi.

If Judge Wingate denies the defense’s Motion For Judgement on the Pleadings, I assume that Dr. Onaka and Ms. Fuddy will be deposed.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/96289285/Mississippi-Democratic-Party-Motion-v-Taitz


98 posted on 01/11/2013 5:40:53 PM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson