Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to Shut Up the Women In Combat Whackos -Vanity
vanity | 1/25/13 | central_va

Posted on 01/25/2013 9:04:25 AM PST by central_va

If you want to stop these pro women in combat lunes dead in their tracks ask them this hypothetical question:

You are a General of an Infantry division and your Commander lets you choose one of two enemy divisions to fight. The first enemy division that you could choose to oppose in the upcoming battle is all male. Or you could instead choose to fight the second enemy division that was mixed faggot, women and men. So which enemy division would you choose to fight?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: combat; women; womenincombat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
Shut them right up.
1 posted on 01/25/2013 9:04:28 AM PST by central_va
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: central_va

You may be selling that second division short. I hear them faggots can lick any man in the house.


2 posted on 01/25/2013 9:07:33 AM PST by jrg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I was surprised Jessica Lynch didn’t end up in some sheik’s harem. They still have slaves over there.


3 posted on 01/25/2013 9:09:20 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Ask any male supporter of this insanity if they would send their wife downstairs at night to deal with a prowler.


4 posted on 01/25/2013 9:09:36 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrg
You may be selling that second division short. I hear them faggots can lick any man in the house.

Good one.

5 posted on 01/25/2013 9:11:40 AM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The problem is, these fools don’t understand that war isn’t a game. Their answer might be, “I’d pick the womyn and the gays, because they have their rights and they deserve their chance!”


6 posted on 01/25/2013 9:24:51 AM PST by CatherineofAragon (Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Ask any male supporter of this insanity if they would send their wife downstairs at night to deal with a prowler.

Skeeter, you've just cut through all the nonsense with this nugget of wisdom. Well done.

7 posted on 01/25/2013 9:29:14 AM PST by Kharis13 (That noise you hear is our Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Ask any male supporter of this insanity if they would send their wife downstairs at night to deal with a prowler.

You'd likely get a "yes". :-) And the wife might agree.

Mrs WBill has a number of female, liberal, feminist friends and co-workers. I had occasion to listen in on a discussion by them of this very topic at a Thanksgiving get together.

The general consensus was "I TOOK a self defense class! I WILL kick the guy's a$$!" Buncha female chest beating.

Unfortunate brainwashing, sez me. I didn't bother with asking them..."Really?", since it would have been a waste of breath.

Any regular-sized guy, bent on destruction, vs an average girl? The girl will get the crap beat out of her, or worse, before she gets to the phone to dial 911. Self Defense classes, while better than nothing (they teach situational awareness, which is good), are otherwise pretty delusional. Figure that the girl is going through a bunch of choreographed hand-to-hand moves with an "attacker" who is likely more worried about not hurting himself. They don't address the "So, this guy gets in your house, picks up your favorite dining room chair, and tries to break your leg with it. What now?". Which, frankly, is a whole lot more realistic. Bad guys don't play fair.

Foolishness. None of Mrs WBill's friends mentioned a gun, either, training in and possession of which I think would be eminently more sensible. :-)

8 posted on 01/25/2013 9:29:20 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Jessica Lynch was repeated gang raped. Hence she disappeared from the public eye.

Can’t let reality set in, don’tcha know.


9 posted on 01/25/2013 9:31:29 AM PST by VRWCarea51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

She wasn’t as good looking as the women they kidnap around the world.


10 posted on 01/25/2013 9:32:41 AM PST by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wbill

Fred Reed talked about this.

He discussed female muscle and bone mass. My take: As a 59 year old man that has not been to a gym in 4 years (I really need to get back to it) I could arm wrestle most “bodybuilder” women and, if I so choose, break their arm.

Period.

This whole thing is utter nonsense. It also brings up the whole equality thing on the flip side: Should women be required to register for the draft?

A civilized country puts women and children in combat as a last resort, and for its very survival, not to be “fair”.


11 posted on 01/25/2013 9:36:52 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

“The problem is, these fools don’t understand that war isn’t a game.”

If it was a game men and women would not be allowed to play against each other. Basketball, tennis, etc. there are no virtually no sports where men and women compete against each other.


12 posted on 01/25/2013 9:43:08 AM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jrg

Those queers would blow them away, and the carpet munchers would pull the rug out from under them.


13 posted on 01/25/2013 9:48:24 AM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wbill

Self defense classes for women have one, and only one, goal: provide an opportunity for the woman to escape.

Prevailing in an attempted rape, without being armed with a firearm, and holding the perp at bay until police arrive is not, and was never, the goal of self-defense classes.

Maybe its time to move them to the front line and let them get a taste of real combat. Let them go on the View when its over.

“There I was trying to scale this cliff with my 100 lbs. pack on and those a$$hole$ in my squad just left me there at the bottom. Can you believe that?”


14 posted on 01/25/2013 9:50:23 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

Fishing?


15 posted on 01/25/2013 9:52:42 AM PST by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: central_va

What general would have either all-female or all-male units? That would be foolish wouldn’t it?


16 posted on 01/25/2013 9:55:06 AM PST by stuartcr ("I upraded my moral compass to a GPS, to keep up with the times.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Yep, I’ve read his columns on the topic. Fred is a pretty sensible guy, for the most part.


17 posted on 01/25/2013 10:06:04 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

“Self defense classes for women have one, and only one, goal: provide an opportunity for the woman to escape.”

Unfortunately for the past few decades TV and movies have promoted the myth of the female warrior who is at least as tough and fierce as her male counterparts. Its everywhere, women beating the hell out of men twice their size. Every depiction of a combat team has at least one female who is sexy but deadly. look for it. Its endemic and it normalizes the idea of women in combat. Reality is much much different.


18 posted on 01/25/2013 10:09:20 AM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

True, and with good reason.


19 posted on 01/25/2013 10:11:45 AM PST by CatherineofAragon (Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wbill

“Yep, I’ve read his columns on the topic. Fred is a pretty sensible guy, for the most part.”

I used to read Fred years ago but it became obvious that he
has a real hatred of America. It doesnt come out often but its there. He is a very entertaining writer and I like his style. On social issues he really lays the truth out and pulls no punches.


20 posted on 01/25/2013 10:13:33 AM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson