Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to Shut Up the Women In Combat Whackos -Vanity
vanity | 1/25/13 | central_va

Posted on 01/25/2013 9:04:25 AM PST by central_va

If you want to stop these pro women in combat lunes dead in their tracks ask them this hypothetical question:

You are a General of an Infantry division and your Commander lets you choose one of two enemy divisions to fight. The first enemy division that you could choose to oppose in the upcoming battle is all male. Or you could instead choose to fight the second enemy division that was mixed faggot, women and men. So which enemy division would you choose to fight?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: combat; women; womenincombat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-71 last
To: stuartcr
Sure I can. You’d choose the faggy girly one. As I said I misread the thread.

Answer the question, it is simple enough. Quit ducking like a coward. The question is FOR YOU not me. Idiot.

51 posted on 01/26/2013 4:58:06 AM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: central_va

??? I did answer it. I’d choose the faggy girly one. What is your problem?


52 posted on 01/26/2013 12:28:17 PM PST by stuartcr ("I upraded my moral compass to a GPS, to keep up with the times.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
??? I did answer it. I’d choose the faggy girly one. What is your problem?

Why?

53 posted on 01/26/2013 12:49:02 PM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

> Those queers would blow them away, and the carpet munchers would pull the rug out from under them.

LOL


54 posted on 01/26/2013 12:54:05 PM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Or ask about how well they’d expect an all-woman NFL team to do?


55 posted on 01/26/2013 1:04:40 PM PST by Steel Wolf ("Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master." - Gaius Sallustius Crispus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Why what...would I pick the faggy girl one or why do I ask about your problem?


56 posted on 01/26/2013 1:30:32 PM PST by stuartcr ("I upraded my moral compass to a GPS, to keep up with the times.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Why what...would I pick the faggy girl one

Why would you pick that one?

57 posted on 01/26/2013 1:32:23 PM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

To: central_va

Because they would probably be easier to defeat.


60 posted on 01/26/2013 1:40:30 PM PST by stuartcr ("I upraded my moral compass to a GPS, to keep up with the times.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: central_va
How about the term bone smoking butt pirates? Does that work for you?

Degrading term.

I have several friends who are homosexual. They're productive citizens and they pay taxes. It's none of my business in what they do in the bedroom.

That said, we can debate whether they should be allowed to serve in the military or whether gay marriage should be permitted but to call them names? We're better than that.

61 posted on 01/26/2013 2:03:09 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The homosexual agenda being forced on the American people is more degrading.


62 posted on 01/26/2013 2:40:24 PM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
What is the difference between “gay” and “fag”? Both words have been co-opted by the parafilia community. Free Republic should not be a haven for excusing Gramscian/Marxists tactics, deviance is deviance no matter what word they try to dress up and call their own.
63 posted on 01/26/2013 2:57:44 PM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

To: houeto

To put it frankly, real men don’t want technology to give them the capability to bear children, and REAL women don’t want to be in ground combat.


65 posted on 01/27/2013 10:46:56 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Melas

I accept your premise.

Just one thing though. I said I haven’t been to a gym, not that I am out of shape. ;-)


66 posted on 01/27/2013 10:51:36 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: central_va
false argument. You chose the unit with the best training and best weapons, of course.

That's why guns are called "equilizers": because a 70 year old out of shape grandmom can take down a 250 pound athletic thug with a decent gun if she knows how to shoot.

link:Combat Barbie

The real problem is more subtle: being in close contact for weeks on end in a small unit. Sexual tension can skyrocket ,,, And that partly depends on behavior (zipper control). Women fought with the infantry in Russia during the second world war and with the Israelis infantry.

The real problem is that this is being pushed for political reasons by feminists who have never been shot at. And women are going to be pressured into "volunteering" while the Pentegon will be pressured into lowering standards to let them serve.

now, for you guys: Here's a nice photo Combat Barbie to keep you happy.



67 posted on 01/28/2013 12:38:36 AM PST by LadyDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc

I am not going to read your post until you answer my question. Then I will read your screed.


68 posted on 01/28/2013 12:49:12 AM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: USAF80

Well, I have a problem with it, so keep it off FR!


69 posted on 01/28/2013 3:42:27 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Lighten up. Its a noun of the the verb nag.

1. To annoy by constant scolding, complaining, or urging.
2. To torment persistently, as with anxiety or pain.


70 posted on 01/28/2013 3:19:24 PM PST by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I did answer the question. The one who will win is the most professional regiment with the best training and equipment.and holding the high ground helps too.

Boudicca lost because her army wasn’t professional.
The (bisexual) Spartans lost not because they were outnumbered 1000 to one but because a traitor showed the persians the pass.


71 posted on 02/01/2013 5:18:21 PM PST by LadyDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson