Don’t we have certain rules that apply to this thread???
Sure do
Posted on 01/28/2013 11:30:22 AM PST by Perdogg
Actress Megan Fox, 26, graces the cover of February’s Esquire Magazine. And if you thought it was only a gossip-driven story, you’re wrong: The accompanying interview that will certainly pique the interest of both movie buffs and people of faith, alike.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
ping
Don’t we have certain rules that apply to this thread???
Don’t we have certain rules that apply to this thread???
Sure do
Not Guilty!
Pretty, but dumb as a box of rocks. Her co-stars on the Transformers said she was too dumb to even be a porn star. Ouch!
She’s smarter than most the hollyweirdos, in that she believes in God.
Right that’s why she makes money dressing like the Whore of Babylon. I don’t think anybody that believes in God, or even the concept of benevolence, would inflict Jennifer’s Body on the world.
The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: and the knowledge of the holy is understanding.
Proverbs 9:10
“too dumb to even be a porn star. Ouch!”
MAJOR Ouch! ~gut wrenching laugh ensuing~
As my brother used to say, she has that half finished look
I’m not claiming she’s smart, nor am I attempting to defend her or say she’s an upright Christian. But I would say that if she professed a belief in God, my expectation would be that her Hollywood co-stars would very quickly dismiss her as “too dumb to be a porn star” or something similar.
Statistically it's a safe bet those co-stars consider Obama a frickin genius.
Good thing she didn’t say she was voting for a Republican. Most actresses are not hired for their IQ.
Pray for Amrrica
Wasn’t she a big supporter of Obama?? Between that & her trashy image, I find it diffcult to buy her devotion to God.
She got big ol' Toe Thumbs.
So, like, there.
Satan believes in God.
Her comment that all people are inherently evil (a reason she used to rationalize her firing her nanny -- after it was reported that another nanny in New York had murdered her charges) is certainly taught in the Bible ('there is none righteous, no not one...'), but she left out the redemption and grace that comes through Jesus Christ and the work of the Holy Spirit - which results in changed lives. That is, Romans 12:2 'And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God'.
The only work that she seems to reference to the Holy Spirit is the work of speaking in tongues... and I'm not so sure at the time of her 'experiences' if she, and her associates, weren't being more influenced by spirits that don't go by the Name of The Holy Spirit...
Anyways, I am sure she did not go into this interview for the purpose of expounding a theological dissertation, so it is unfair to consider that her comments were well thought out and developed. I just saw the title of this post and got my hopes up - and I was curious to hear how she'd rationalize her behaviour on screen with her beliefs...but after reading the article... maybe there is nothing to rationalize.
Hollywood remains the cesspool it has always been, and maybe there are no Lots remaining in the neighborhood.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.