Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Cost of Islamic Incest
Cash Daily ^ | Nicolai Sennels

Posted on 05/12/2013 5:16:53 PM PDT by Morgana

A tragic phenomenon which is taking a terrible toll on everyone involved.

There is a dire phenomenon rising in Europe that is crippling entire societies and yet the continent sleeps, refusing not only to confront the destructive elephant in the room, but also to admit its very existence.

The troubling reality being referred to is the widespread practice of Muslim inbreeding and the birth defects and social ills that it spawns.

The tragic effect of the Left’s control of the boundaries of debate is that any discussion about vital issues such as these marks an individual as an “Islamophobe” and a “racist.”

A person who dares to point at the pathology of inbreeding in the Muslim community is accused of whipping up hatred against Muslim people.

But all of this could not be further from the truth. To fight against inbreeding anywhere is to defend humanity and to defend innocent babies from birth defects.

Fighting against this Islamic practice stems from a pro-Muslim calling, since identifying destructive ideologies and practices in Islam enables the protection of the Muslim people from harm.

Massive inbreeding

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: incest; islam; muslimincest; muslims; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Morgana

I agree....let them continue. Allah wants retarded followers.

21 posted on 05/12/2013 6:08:27 PM PDT by Dallas59 (Q: The worst president in US history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

You add Islamic teaching on top of that cake and there you have it!

That is why any who claim to be moderate are just blowing smoke to enjoy the priviledges of being here...they could give two cents about this country or they would deny ISlam and their dastardly prophet...and burn their Koran.

Until then they are not to be trusted no matter how or what they say.

22 posted on 05/12/2013 6:11:45 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

My understanding is 100% of them , if they are tested, have some form of PTSD...and varying other mental issues.

23 posted on 05/12/2013 6:14:29 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
the ones like Chuck that are born there are British blood line not withstanding...
24 posted on 05/12/2013 6:17:35 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

When you look at their prophet anyone who follows his teachings is going to have some form of mental illness...

Some interesting facts from a New Book...

“The Mental Illness of the Prophet Muhammed”


....the five oldest and most trusted ‘Islamic sources’ do not portray Muhammad a superior being or any kind Godly mercy for mankind. The sources reveal that he was a thief, a liar, an assassin, a pedophile, a shameless womanizer, a promiscuous husband, a rapist, a mass-murderer, a desert pirate, a warmonger, a spineless coward and a calculating and ruthless tyrant. It is certainly not the character profile of the founder of a true religion.

....given some of Muhammad’s well-known documented behaviors, it is certain that he had a conflict-ridden psychological dependence on others..... He equated love with weakness and feared intimacy...... He inflicted pain and abuse on others as his second nature.....

He was unable to give his followers a reason to live, so he gave them enough reasons to die – die in Allah’s name to enter paradise...... He could not convince the Arabs to choose his religion based upon its merits, so he threatened them with damnation....... The religion he preached was more about fantasy, less about proof.

A person who, among other atrocities, orders, and then watches, the beheading of 800 innocent people, and beds the wife of a man whom he had tortured to death on the same night cannot be considered psychologically normal..... Common sense alone tells us that a 51-year-old man, who marries a 6-year-old girl, is abnormal..... The notion that a godly revelation would focus on the sexual desires of a lecherous man is really disgusting.

Muhammad had shown all the symptoms of his lunacy and his prophetic claim was based on the quicksand of grand delusion.... But the irony is that the entire religion of Islam is based on the truth claim of such a man, who could easily swing back and forth between the two extremes – reality and fantasy.

Religion was just a cause for Muhammad. He actually worshipped his own image – not God..... He had created Allah in his own image and attributed to that God the qualities of his own self...... Allah was a plastic entity that Muhammad shaped to meet his needs.....

That is why Allah seems a multidimensional entity in the Qur’an, an obedient servant that Muhammad used on all occasions, from managing the harem affairs of his wives to swearing to punish mercilessly whosoever disagrees with His beloved messenger.

No religion in the world has ever destroyed family ties as Muhammad has done in Islam.

25 posted on 05/12/2013 6:30:43 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
The Cost of Islamic Incest:

26 posted on 05/12/2013 6:35:19 PM PDT by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LyinLibs

Him or that sasquatch he married?

27 posted on 05/12/2013 6:36:34 PM PDT by Morgana (Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: caww
or, the more rational alternative, Mohamed didn't really exist. Sure, there was a religious reformer ~ and we now know what he was involved in ~ suppressing an Hindu snake cult operated out of the kaaba.

All the other stuff was created in Damascus a long time after the man's death.

28 posted on 05/12/2013 6:38:53 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: null and void

If you love your daughter you have very little choice. In islam she is a slave so that daughter you love, you keep her close where you have some say on her treatment (your clan or close family) otherwise if you care nothing for her you marry her outside the clan or family where you have no say on her treatment in a society that has taught their men women are from the devil and a lower life form that you can beat or betray on a whim.

Mulsim incest is a form of love believe it or not. Islam is a sick religion and only leads to evil even when you are trying your best to protect those you love.

29 posted on 05/12/2013 7:16:07 PM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lady Heron; PapaBear3625

PapaBear3625 has some other valid points at post 19.

Different take, same net result.

30 posted on 05/12/2013 7:23:43 PM PDT by null and void (The motto of all liberals is "With your guilt and your gelt we can get away with anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I wonder to what degree the spread of Islam was on the influx of fresh DNA / outbreeding via the captured concubines. The first generation took over by surprise and zeal - the second through training by experienced warriors and without inbreeding depression of their intelligence.

31 posted on 05/12/2013 8:04:44 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Saudi Arabia Awakes to the Perils of Inbreeding
New York Times
01 May 2003

32 posted on 05/12/2013 8:13:49 PM PDT by donna (Pray for revival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

And I thought it was just sheep and goats they were bonking ...

33 posted on 05/12/2013 8:28:11 PM PDT by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: caww
He could not convince the Arabs to choose his religion based upon its merits, so he threatened them with damnation.......

Could not the same be said of Christianity? After all Hell is a part of Christian cosmology and theolgoy too.

34 posted on 05/12/2013 8:37:49 PM PDT by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The problem with inbreeding is one of receiving two copies of the same messed up gene. Not one of having an extra chromosome i.e. trisomy 21.

35 posted on 05/12/2013 8:47:05 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; LucyT; Hardraade; MestaMachine; Old Sarge; shibumi; daisy mae for the usa; KylaStarr; ...
Great Post.

Muslims are dangerous and dangerously inbred. I have been posting this to FR for years. Maybe it's catching on.

Ask anyone who knows anything about Britain's National Health. It is in real danger of actually being bankrupted by the statistical anomaly presented by the huge number of Pakistani Birth defects.

Saudis? Huge numbers are drooling fools: deaf, cross-eyed, bad kidneys, polydactilism, strange body morphism, tragic Birth Defects, and nuttier than fruitcakes.

The Saudi government is feverishly subsidizing the importation of suitable foreign Muslim breeding stock in order to open up the gene pool.

36 posted on 05/12/2013 8:52:42 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk ("Obama" The Movie. Introducing Reggie Love as "Monica." .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
The Curious Case of Carlos II

Getting back on topic, if we're looking for a royal personage who was a victim of inbreeding depression the clearest candidate is Carlos II (1661-1700), the last Habsburg king of Spain. Most history books will tell you his deficiencies were the result of excessive inbreeding, but let's look at the evidence for ourselves.

How inbred was he?

That Carlos was the product of inbreeding is undeniable. Since the days of his ancestor Charles V (1500-1558, aka Carlos I of Spain), the Habsburgs had been in the habit of marrying members of the family's Spanish branch to members of the Austrian branch. Oh yeah, in their heyday the Habsburgs controlled not only the Spanish and Austrian Empires but also the low countries (Benelux), Portugal, southern Italy (Naples and Sicily), Milan and Burgundy.

Have a look at Carlos II's family tree. His mother and father were niece and uncle. Granted, this was sort of an accident of history given that this was Philip IV's second marriage, and it just so happened that none of the sons of his first wife, Elisabeth of Bourbon, lived long enough to accede to the throne.

A couple of other fun facts indicative of Carlos' pedigree collapse:

(1) Carlos was descended from his great great great grandparents Juana la Loca (1479-1555) and Philip the Handsome (1478-1506, Felipe el Hermoso) through three of their children.

(2) whereas someone whose ascendants (i.e. direct ancestors) were all unrelated to their spouses would have 32 great great great grandparents, Carlos only had 14.

How messed up was he?

Carlos' physical and mental deficiencies earned him the nickname "El Hechizado" (The Hexed). First off, there was his debilitating overbite. Prominent chins ran in the Habsburg family (check out the portraits of Charles V or of Carlos' father Philip IV), but with Carlos II the condition was so bad that he had problems chewing. It's also said that it was difficult to understand Carlos when he spoke and that he frequently drooled. To me this seems analogous to those overly purebred Persian cats whose faces are so flat that they have respiratory problems and their tear ducts get blocked up.

This, however, was the least of Carlos' problems. He was feeble and sickly, prone to high fevers which kept him confined to his bed. It's also said that he suffered from seizures, that he invariably vomited on carriage rides due to chronic motion sickness, and that his eyes oozed liquid in open air. In addition to his physical shortcomings, Carlos II was purportedly dim-witted and he was left basically uneducated. The classic 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica claims "there was no room in his nearly imbecile mind for more than childish superstition, insane pride of birth, and an interest in court etiquette." Due to his weak health, he remained mostly idle while his mother, his bastard brother Don Juan José of Austria, and his advisors made most of the decisions affecting the Empire, with Carlos' most vigorous activity consisting of the occasional hunt.

Although he was married twice Carlos II fathered no children, and it is assumed that he was infertile if not actually impotent. His reign as king was largely disastrous and his inability to produce an heir led to the War of Spanish Succession.

Was this inbreeding depression?

As I said above, Carlos' mandibular prognasthism sounds like a heriditary physical trait which became exacerbated to the point of becoming a deformity due to inbreeding. Moreover, his sickliness and sexual dysfunction appear analogous to immunity and reproduction problems which have been documented in highly inbred lab rats. Therefore, I think it seems very likely that Carlos' problems did indeed stem from inbreeding depression.

Interestingly enough, Carlos' sister the Infanta Margarita Teresa (1651-1673, who as a little girl was the subject of Velázquez's masterpiece Las Meninas) was not affected by the same problems as him. She was lively and beautiful although, judging by her portrait, she looks like she had a strong chin. Margarita was married to the Emperor Leopold I (her uncle and first cousin) who was himself pretty inbred and had an abnormal underbite although he was otherwise fit and intelligent. They had six children (only one of whom survived to adulthood) before Margarita died at the age of 21.
37 posted on 05/12/2013 10:03:31 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
No comparisons......night and and and hate...the two are diametrically opposed.
38 posted on 05/12/2013 10:17:18 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

*Technically* it’s not incest, at least as our society currently defines that. Incest is a sexual relationship with a *near* blood relative such as sibling, parent, or grandparent. Breeding with cousins isn’t incest ... it’s just icky.

The term the writer should have used was “inbreeding” rather than “incest.” Interestingly, inbreeding is sometimes used by breeders of horses, etc. in search of strengthening a particular physical trait. But of course, horse breeders have the freedom to cull the genetic disasters.

39 posted on 05/12/2013 10:59:09 PM PDT by Hetty_Fauxvert (FUBO, and the useful idiots you rode in on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; GOPsterinMA; BillyBoy; Perdogg; NFHale

Shelbyville Iraq.

40 posted on 05/12/2013 11:43:15 PM PDT by Impy (All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson