Skip to comments.So a Hispanic shoots a black and is acquited by women, but it's still white men's fault.
Posted on 07/13/2013 10:07:09 PM PDT by ctpsb
"So a Hispanic shoots a black and is acquited by women, but it's still white men's fault."
WOW!! I like that statement! Going to us it.
Natürliche, mein Herr.
Obama (1/2 white) is more white than Zimmerman (1/4 black, 1/2 hispanic, 1/4 white).
But George’s “white”. And Obama’s the first “black” president.
goebbels would be proud with our liberal msm media and race baiters. They do him proud. Repeat the lies long enough, make them big ones, and people will believe them.
Of course it’s the white man’s fault. More specifically, it’s George Bush’s fault.
Isn’t his “white” half Jewish?
My thoughts exactly when I read it! Figured many would like to use it because it makes the point so well.
Of course there was no outcry. The one doing the shooting was black and the recipient of the bullet was white. Move on - nothing to see here.
It’s just proof of much the patriarchal hegemony has transcended the zeitgeist narrative. /s
He pissed off one black thug with that comment.
If a white man shoots a gun in a forest and there is no one around, is it still racist?
Why? Because we're easy to blame and there's never any consequence for blaming us. We're too damn tired from working to support ourselves and our families to riot. Too damn busy to protest. Too well educated - real education - to be mislead and manipulated by race-hustling media whores. Too genuinely accepting of diversity to issue idiotic fatwahs against someone for a perceived slight. No, we're an easy, convenient target that takes no explanation.
Nope. Father is white (possibly Jewish), mother is Peruvian immigrant and therefore Hispanic.
One of her grandparents was "black," though possibly not full-blooded.
So GZ is maximum 1/8 African ancestry.
“So a Hispanic shoots a black and is acquited by women, but it’s still white men’s fault.”
Hey , whats the over / under for black on black homicide in major urban areas of America this week end. I say 35 or more!
But he was a white Hispanic as compared to a black, green or purple Hispanic.
So by the associative laws of algebra, that makes Obama a white black.
Of course. Anything a white man does without the approval of the liberal establishment is racist. We know the firearm is a surrogate for a penis. Not that it is necessarily true, or even if it was would have anything to do with the question, but you know that will be brought up and used against the white man anyway. The gunshot is somehow environmentally damaging, obviously intentional by the white man. We know he's trying to kill trees as a stand in for some other race - no we don't need any evidence of this, we already know it. The burning powder is also an obvious attempt to increase global warming and harm all the non-white races through climate change. The lead in the bullet is obviously intended to pollute the groundwater and impact the poor black man who can't afford the bottled water we all know the white man is drinking.
The only possible way the liberal/fascist establishment could begin to accept a white man firing a gun in the forest would be if he were doing it in celebration of something they approve of. Say gay-pride day or some such. Of course, they'd still fault him for doing it alone in the forest instead of going public with his support of whatever...
I’ll see your 35 and raise you 5!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.