Posted on 11/15/2013 7:52:02 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Usually lurk but had to post this for the programmers out there
http://imageshack.com/a/img440/2996/tu2.png
Swapping backup reels?
—— Can someone make SAP go away? ——
Hahaha.... Ha.
You misunderstand, I worded that poorly. It doesn’t actually turn your computer into Win7, what it does is installs a shell that turns your Metro desktop into the usual Win7 desktop. You’ll still be running Win8, all your pics/docs/movies/etc will still be there, it just gives you back a proper desktop.
Might it be marketed as Super Fly?
A little humor - when C++ came out, the COBOL folks planned to counter it with Add One to COBOL.
In an announcement that has stunned the computer industry, Ken Thompson, Dennis Ritchie and Brian Kernighan admitted that the Unix operating system and C programming language created by them is an elaborate prank kept alive for over 20 years. Speaking at the recent UnixWorld Software Development Forum, Thompson revealed the following:
"In 1969, AT&T had just terminated their work with the GE/Honeywell/AT&T Multics project. Brian and I had started work with an early release of Pascal from Professor Niklaus Wirth's ETH Labs in Switzerland and we were impressed with its elegant simplicity and power. Dennis had just finished reading 'Bored of the Rings', a National Lampoon parody of the Tolkien's 'Lord of the Rings' trilogy. As a lark, we decided to do parodies of the Multics environment and Pascal. Dennis and I were responsible for the operating environment. We looked at Multics and designed the new OS to be as complex and cryptic as possible to maximize casual users' frustration levels, calling it Unix as a parody of Multics, as well as other more risque! allusions. We sold the terse command language to novitiates by telling them that it saved them typing.
Then Dennis and Brian worked on a warped version of Pascal, called 'A'. 'A' looked a lot like Pascal, but elevated the notion of the direct memory address (which Wirth had banished) to the central concept of the "pointer" as an innocuous sounding name for a truly malevolent construct. Brian must be credited with the idea of having absolutely no standard I/O specification: this ensured that at least 50% of the typical commercial program would have to be re-coded when changing hardware platforms.
Brian was also responsible for pitching this lack of I/O as a feature: it allowed us to describe the language as "truly portable". When we found others were actually creating real programs with A, we removed compulsory type-checking on function arguments. Later, we added a notion we called "casting": this allowed the programmer to treat an integer as though it were a 50kb user-defined structure. When we found that some programmers were simply not using pointers, we eliminated the ability to pass structures to functions, enforcing their use in even the simplest applications. We sold this, and many other features, as enhancements to the efficiency of the language. In this way, our prank evolved into B, BCPL, and finally C.
We stopped when we got a clean compile on the following syntax: for(;P("\n"),R-;P("|"))for(e=C;e-;P("_"+(*u++/8)%2))P("| "+(*u/4)%2);
At one time, we joked about selling this to the Soviets to set their computer science progress back 20 or more years.
Unfortunately, AT&T and other US corporations actually began using Unix and C. We decided we'd better keep mum, assuming it was just a passing phase. In fact, it's taken US companies over 20 years to develop enough expertise to generate useful applications using this 1960's technological parody. We are impressed with the tenacity of the general Unix and C programmer. In fact, Brian, Dennis and I have never ourselves attempted to write a commercial application in this environment.
We feel really guilty about the chaos, confusion and truly awesome programming projects that have resulted from our silly prank so long ago."
Dennis Ritchie said: "What really tore it (just when ADA was catching on), was that Bjarne Stroustrup caught onto our joke. He extended it to further parody Smalltalk. Like us, he was caught by surprise when nobody laughed. So he added multiple inheritance, virtual base classes, and later ...templates. All to no avail. So we now have compilers that can compile 100,000 lines per second, but need to process header files for 25 minutes before they get to the meat of "Hello, World".
Major Unix and C vendors and customers, including AT&T, Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, GTE, NCR, and DEC have refused comment at this time.
Borland International, a leading vendor of object-oriented tools, including the popular Turbo Pascal and Borland C++, stated they had suspected for Windows was originally written in C++. Philippe Kahn said: "After two and a half years programming, and massive programmer burn-outs, we re-coded the whole thing in Turbo Pascal in three months. I think it's fair to say that Turbo Pascal saved our bacon". Another Borland spokesman said that they would continue to enhance their Pascal products and halt further efforts to develop C/C++.
Professor Wirth of the ETH Institute and father of the Pascal, Modula 2, and Oberon structured languages, cryptically said "P.T. Barnum was right." He had no further comments.
All names are Registered Trademarks of their respective companies. This article was found on the USENET - its author could not be determined.
This piece was found on Usenet. This is fiction, not reality. Always remember that this is not true. It's really a joke, right? -- Editor
My favorite part:
We stopped when we got a clean compile on the following syntax: for(;P("\n"),R-;P("|"))for(e=C;e-;P("_"+(*u++/8)%2))P("| "+(*u/4)%2);
That one really burns in my craw. Back in 2010 Microsoft was evangelizing Silverlight as the Next Big Thing for the Windows ecosystem. All new apps should be written in C#/Silverlight. They even promised a cross-platform engine for Linux and Android.
Then.. poof. It was gone. Microsoft dropped it like a hot potato and went running off to create WinRT.
As an app developer I will never trust them again.
I used Silverlight to watch those Sunday Night football games, it seemed to work okay back then. I liked being able to pick my camera view.
Oh well.
If you like your Silverlight, you and keep it ( to paraphrase a recent President).
I think HTML5 is the way to go...
Things change on a dime these days...just be glad at least there will be some level of standardization with HTML5 and less proprietary stuff.
Yep, that looks familiar.
As an app developer I will never trust them again.
It's not the first time they've pushed everyone into the Next Big Thing, then promptly abandoned it when it it suited their purpose.
I don't feel sorry at all for all the folks who bought the previous windows phone that was completely abandoned by them.
Corporations, especially, simply never do learn anything.
Good stuff! :-)
If you’re a ‘White Guy’, you have already become obsolete. In the opinion of clueless management/accounting/executive types anyway.
Quality Assurance testing for billion dollar websites like obamacare.guv!
I had a Federal account that account that was running code from erly IBM 7040 I believ with multiple levels of emulators on 3090 under MVS..in the Mid 80's. I bet the same blob of code is still running today on whatever.
No that is not correct. I use FORTRAN for number crunching and FORTRAN 2015 is coming: http://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2013/08/08/doctor-fortran-goes-dutch-fortran-2015
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.