Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Southern Discomfort: U.S. Army seeks removal of Lee, ‘Stonewall’ Jackson honors
The Washington Times ^ | December 17, 2013 | Rowan Scarborough

Posted on 12/17/2013 11:24:11 AM PST by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: jazusamo

Gosh, the north act like they’re afraid they lost the war.


81 posted on 12/17/2013 4:05:04 PM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: X Fretensis

For me it was the evacuation, spiking of the guns and burning of Ft Moultrie and removal of his men by Maj. Anderson to Ft Sumter. The second was when Buchanan ordered the steamer Star of the West to reinforce Sumter not with food only but with 200 soldiers, supplies and ammunition. The warship Brooklyn accompanied the steamer. The orders for the combatants were to remain hidden throughout the movement through Charleston harbor. The South Carolina defense forces became aware of the mission, fired on the Star of the West forcing her away. The ensuing weeks after Lincoln’s inauguration were a period of deception and increasing anxiety created by the presence of hostile federals at the mouth of an important harbor. That it was to be abandoned in three days is news to me. Can you provide a source. Tilley’s account of Sumter is based predominantly on communication among federal military and government officials, including the then saturnine Lincoln. By the time Beauregard reluctantly fired on his old friend, there was a formidable Northern armada within a day or two steaming toward Charleston Harbor. The “First Shot”, engineered by the clever Mr. Lincoln, is one of history’s greatest canards.


82 posted on 12/17/2013 4:33:53 PM PST by Bill W was a conservative (Profile, detain, interrogate, deport.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Which revision? The one that makes Lee, who committed treason into a great American? Or the revision that recognizes that Lee committed treason, despite his prior honorable services, and his keeping of his parole agreement which protected him from prosecution?


83 posted on 12/17/2013 6:17:58 PM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Lee and Jackson were Americans, just Americans who committed treason.


84 posted on 12/17/2013 6:18:51 PM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Certainly it was racism. Japanese Americans in Hawaii were not interned.

Interning the Japanese was probably a mistake, absent reasonable evidence that they were cooperating with the Japanese government in espionage. The Japanese embassy signals were being read quickly and regularly, and they may have bragged a lot about how many Japanese Americans were helping them, from bureaucratic competition. Given those lies, it makes some degree of sense to understand that a threat might be there and something perhaps should be done. Rather like Wahabi funded mosques in the US at present, or the pro-slavery militia units in Washington DC in 1860.

But keep in mind that while Japanese Americans were being interned, other Americans were conscripted, forced into the Army, and sent out to sleep in holes filled with icy water until they had to face German machine guns. Some Japanese Americans got a chance to do that too.


85 posted on 12/17/2013 6:26:43 PM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

Jackson was shot by his own men.

He had the habit of wearing US Army uniform as he rode out in front of his lines.

The accident is understandable.


86 posted on 12/17/2013 6:28:29 PM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

I figure they will use the Stone Mountain bas relief for target practice right after the slave ledgers of Lee are released to document his practice of raping and torturing his slaves.


87 posted on 12/17/2013 6:30:23 PM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rusty schucklefurd

The southern forces were initially much better equipped than the US Army because of the US Army small arms and cannon that had been stolen by the pretended confederacy.


88 posted on 12/17/2013 6:33:08 PM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

These guys are jackasses

Why Fresno tolerated them is a mystery

Some are black and angry...like X though he never fesses up

And some are just stupid

Most are some sort of a minority ...skin or religion....figure beating up southern white heritage is an easy place to start for them


89 posted on 12/18/2013 12:40:36 AM PST by wardaddy (choctaw bingo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: X Fretensis

That is inaccurate

Anderson’s 3 days left was conditional on two things as he stated them:

Orders not to abandon period or resupply...unlikely

Beauregard had asked for a precise time and promise he would abandon the fort shortly given Anderson’s lack of food

Speaking strictly for myself I think Pierre acted a bit rash....


90 posted on 12/18/2013 12:54:18 AM PST by wardaddy (choctaw bingo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

You continue to be one disgusting POS


91 posted on 12/18/2013 1:24:19 AM PST by catfish1957 (Face it!!!! The government in DC is full of treasonous bastards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone
if i remember my history correctly, the rebels fired the first shot...
with that in mind, who was the aggressor????

Our uninvited guests wouldn't leave, even after asking them nicely.

As a matter of fact, they prepared to do us harm.

After Fort Sumter (where no one was killed from hostilities), the Union called for 70,000 volunteers to march to Richmond. That was the First Manassas (Bull Run). Clearly northern aggression.

As a matter of principal, the Confederacy was not demanding land or tribute. It just wanted to be left alone. It did not garrison forts within the territory of its northern neighbors. What were the the South's aggressive goals? To be left alone, to kindly part ways.

Now, what were the goals of the North? They were to force the South to submit, to retake southern territory into their union, and to dictate terms of existence to the South. Sounds very aggressive to me.

Had the North stopped attacking the South, the war would have stopped. The South had no desire to force anything on the North. Thus, the only aggression that existed, existed in the North.

92 posted on 12/18/2013 5:16:00 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Sounds like a dumb faggot


93 posted on 12/18/2013 5:21:54 AM PST by Rome2000 (THE WASHINGTONIANS AND UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE ARE THE ENEMY -ROTATE THE CAPITAL AMONGST THE STATES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

This is true. He rode into an ambush of and by his own men. General “Stonewall” Jackson was a Master Tactician. He Scouted, every field, before battle. Was certainly a sad day for the South losing this General.


94 posted on 12/18/2013 6:41:24 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Thank God the South is not the Democrat slaver states they once were.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/08/06/The-Pro-Slavery-Roots-of-the-Modern-Left

Long live the Conservative Bible believing and God fearing Southern states of today!

95 posted on 12/18/2013 7:11:13 AM PST by celmak (A voice from the past)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: celmak

As a Devout Believer and Southerner, I want to Thank You for your comments.


96 posted on 12/18/2013 7:30:50 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

always good to hear from folks who are the victors….. Lee was an honorable man who resigned from the US army because he felt compelled to defend his state…. and interesting position that the 10th amendment at the time seems to defend


97 posted on 12/18/2013 9:33:15 AM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; rockrr
I was referring to the idea that Lee's being offered command of the Union troops somehow said something about Lincoln or Lee that would contradict the rest of the record, but, sure, if an officer in our army decided to fight against the country, it would say something important about his make-up, wouldn't it? If you could have spotted signs of that beforehand, wouldn't it be cause for concern?

The veneration of Lee as a pre-modern figure who followed his conscience has a bit of a post-modernist look to it, as though if you're sincere enough, you can turn away from long-held loyalties and commitments. I don't have a problem with people holding up Lee as a moral exemplar, a hero, a decent man, so long as we recognize there's also a lot of ambiguity involved. He was a better person than I could ever be, but gosh, there are complications in his personality that might give one pause.

98 posted on 12/18/2013 1:44:09 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
In 1918, the Army turned to the Rotary Club of Columbus Georgia for a name for the new base it was building in south Georgia. The club decided to name it Camp Benning after Henry L. Benning, a Confederate General and the Army agreed.

Benning, an unsuccessful politician, had been a fervent secessionist well before 1860. In 1850 he went to the Nashville Convention and supported pro-secession measures. In 1860, Benning helped to break up his own Democratic Party, led the fight to take Georgia out of the Union, and went to Virginia as a secession commissioner to agitate for secession.

My own impulse would be to let sleeping dogs lie, to say that it's Fort Benning, like Fort Knox, and nobody gives much thought to just who Benning or (sadly) Knox was, but one might wonder, just how it was that that the government actually went along with the club's suggestion all those years ago.

99 posted on 12/18/2013 1:45:15 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

:-)


100 posted on 12/18/2013 4:34:16 PM PST by celmak (A voice from the past)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson