Posted on 01/12/2014 6:53:57 AM PST by rktman
Banks don't want their assets seized.
-Feds have no jurisdiction in this matter per the constitution.
-Commerce clause should not apply for plants grown within a state for personal use or sales to residents of that same state.
-Just like with guns, the feds
-Medical pot has been legal in some states since 1996.
We have a bought corrupt government. It is unavoidable when so much power is in the hands of a few. An entity can hand a few $million to a few reps/regulators/etc and those edicts can push $billions to their side. All enforced at the barrel of a gun by scary trigger-happy shocktroops(SWAT).
*-Just like with guns, the feds should allow the states to make the majority of rules.
For now it appears yes. The article talks of a store owner who paid $50k in taxes with cash. With a pic to boot. Ya did read the article didn't ya? :)
I prefer to wait for the pictures :) -- you know, the type who thinks that the movie is usually always better than the book or that a picture is worth ... 35 words.
So Bitcoin becomes the currency of convenience for any illegal transactions. Fi, fie, fo fum....I smell the smell of a Soros plan!
And right back at ya.
as they go with any other legal product, so it will go with firearms...
Why do you hate the Tenth Amendment?
Absolutely!
The U.S. market for legal marijuana, currently valued at $1.4 billion, is projected to grow to $2.3 billion in 2014 and $10.2 billion in five years.
If you think the banks aren’t going to lobby to get a piece, you’re nuts. And if we know one thing about America, the banks get what the banks want.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.