To: DBrow
Or, there is a purge of key personnel to support some upcoming nuke event.
Which do you think is the most likely "nuke event":
1. Nukes used to stop a military uprising.
2. Nukes used to punish "uncooperative" conservatives (like Stalin starving millions of farmers).
3. Nukes used to fake a "terrorist" attack in order to justify martial law.
The islamist communist occupying the White House is capable of any of these actions. Rather than be concerned about collateral damage, he would rejoice in it and plan to kill as many "bitter clingers" as possible. He doesn't plan on leaving in January 2017. The only bright side to that is that Hillary will be very disappointed.
60 posted on
01/16/2014 11:03:33 AM PST by
Ragnar54
(Obama replaced Osama as America's worst enemy and Al Qaeda's financier)
To: Ragnar54
Most likely?
An accidental or rogue launch against some Shiite target, or possibly in Israel.
I don’t see a domestic use, that might contaminate the rice and soy we ship to China.
61 posted on
01/16/2014 11:25:05 AM PST by
DBrow
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson