Posted on 01/27/2014 9:05:31 PM PST by Kevmo
I looked at some of CodeToad’s posts in 2011 and, sure enough, he was doing the same thing back then: Lying about what I actually posted, arguing against what he thought I might post in the future, basically engaging in vigilante censorship.
“You quoted a statement of someone else COMPLETELY UNRELATED to Scientific Instruments’s presentation that I posted.”
Er... no wonder you are confused. It was National Instruments you posted, not Scientific Instruments.
And the presentation was by the dude I quoted NOT National Instruments ...
“This THREAD is about how Rossi sold some of his IP, so there’s OBVIOUSLY something to it. “
You mean about how you CLAIM he sold some IP. NO PROOF!!!!
“Look at Kevmo’s posts in 2011. He promised the same thing, claimed it worked (Literally: “It works!”), and claimed Rossi had sold thousands of them. All lies. None of it was true.”
One think I give credit to Kevmo for .... His faithfulness to the true is ZERO.
Once again you prove yourself to have numb nuts. I didn’t claim it, the ARTICLE claims it.
You want proof? Just call Cherokee Investments and ask. Duhh. How idiotic can one skeptopath be? It’s possible you have proven yourself to be the MOST idiotic of the bunch. We shall see.
You quoted a statement of someone else COMPLETELY UNRELATED to Scientific Instruments’s presentation that I posted.
Typo: National Instruments, not Scientific Instruments. My link has NI, so does his, so it should be no harm done.
Now you’re gonna hide behind a friggin TYPO?
Gawd, you’re pathetic.
At this point the only thing I can give TG credit for is that he posts from Satire as if it were Truth, posts from a completely unrelated article (that disputes HIS OWN claim) as if it were meaningful, and now he hides behind a friggin typo. First.Class.Idiot.
the presentation was by the dude I quoted NOT National Instruments ...
***You were posting it as if it were from NI. Geez, you’re a loonie.
“Once again you prove yourself to have numb nuts. I didn’t claim it, the ARTICLE claims it.”
Again ... NO NET ENERGY GAIN CALCULATION DUE TO LACK OF CALIBRATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And AGAIN you prove yourself to be a dufus.
Thanks for bumping the thread T4BTT.
Just repeating your same claim that was so thoroughly proven to be idiotic is a sign of a mental imbalance.
At least you are not still trying to claim that there was a net energy gain ....
You’re just trying to save face.
I sent you to a link, you posted from another, completely different link. And what you posted had NOTHING to do with what I posted.
Since then, you’ve been trying to dance away from your original post. It’s understandable, because your post makes you look like a complete idiot. Which is what you are: a complete idiot. Lurkers only need to look through your posts on this thread to verify it.
So... therefore... thanks for bumping the thread....T4BTT.
What an incredible claim!!!!!
When did I claim it on this thread? I didn’t. YOU DID. You set it up as a straw argument. Not me.
Pleeeeease.... keep posting on this thread. It is so revealing in terms of how skeptopaths think. Thank you SO MUCH!!! Keep on posting!!!
You are the perfect pasquinade. By all means, I hope you keep posting on LENR threads.
“I sent you to a link, you posted from another, completely different link. And what you posted had NOTHING to do with what I posted.”
Same demonstration. Just doesn’t support your claim ....
IN FACT ... NULLIFIES YOUR CLAIM.
“By all means, I hope you keep posting on LENR threads.”
If I miss one, please feel free to ping me. Thanks.
What’s a LENR thread without seagulls? When this technology breaks out, people will be asking why there was so much hostility towards it, and they will be aggressively asking posters like you why you were such an adam henry. Best of luck with that.
Same demonstration.
***No. It was a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT demonstration by a person COMPLETELY UNRELATED to National Instruments. The ONLY link between them was that they were both mentioned in the article that YOU introduced, which happened to NOT be the article I was linking to. That is 3 steps you took away from reality, just on this one instance. That is how aggressively stupid you are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.