Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman, 24, faces wiretapping charge after recording her own arrest over 'drunken dispute'
dailymail ^ | 13 May 2014 | Snejana Farberov

Posted on 05/13/2014 8:38:41 AM PDT by dennisw

Woman, 24, faces WIRETAPPING charge after recording her own arrest over 'drunken dispute'

Springfield, Massachusetts, police officers say Karen Dziewit threatened to get them fired during her arrest on disorderly conduct charge The 24-year-old woman claimed to be a 'law student' and screamed at police that she will see them in court Dziewit turned on voice recorder feature on her smartphone and hid it in her purse along with empty half-pint of vodka

A 24-year-old Massachusetts woman was charged with unlawful wiretapping after secretly recording her arrest for disorderly conduct.

The Springfield Police Department accused Karen Dziewit of drinking outside a building at about 2am Sunday. She’s also accused of yelling and disturbing residents and refusing to quiet down.

When the 24-year-old Dziewit was about to be taken into custody, police say she turned on a recording feature on her smartphone, hid it in her purse and captured her arrest.

Ms Dziewit was charged with unlawful wiretapping, disorderly conduct and an open container violation.

On Monday, the Chicopee resident was arraigned and released on her own recognizance. She is due back in court July 8 for a pre-trial hearing.

Under a Massachusetts state law, it is illegal to record someone's voice without the person's knowledge or permission.

Chapter 272, Section 99 of the General Laws states that it is against the law 'to secretly hear......

It is illegal to record conversations in Massachusetts without knowledge or consent of all parties

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Humor; Local News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Boogieman

I don’t know why they still think that will work, any competent lab can recover the deleted file and show when it was deleted. Then, you get to add destruction of evidence to the Civil Rights violation lawsuit.


21 posted on 05/13/2014 10:27:51 AM PDT by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net

This is Massachusetts, they will steal your kid should your doctor not agree with another doctor...


22 posted on 05/13/2014 11:11:05 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

I understand the search warrant concept, but the law seems to have a pretty clear ban on such activity.


23 posted on 05/13/2014 4:35:28 PM PDT by logic101.net (How many more children must die on the altar of gun control?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Technically, isn’t wiretapping when you make a connection to a phone line and secretly record the conversation?

This isn’t wiretapping. It’s simply recording without all the parties knowledge and permission.


24 posted on 07/08/2014 3:26:03 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson