Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio dad can't have more kids until he pays off child support, court says
Fox News ^ | 05/14/2014 | AP

Posted on 05/16/2014 11:02:18 AM PDT by Rusty0604

ELYRIA, Ohio – An Ohio appeals court has upheld a judge's order that a deadbeat father can't have more kids until he pays his back child support.

In January 2013, Lorain County Probate Judge James Walther said Taylor couldn't have more children while he is on probation for five years.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Rusty0604

In this case, I’d vote for him to undergo a vasectomy—even if it had to be paid for with public funds.


21 posted on 05/16/2014 11:12:53 AM PDT by basil (2ASisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNGal

I’ve seen one or two times on “Maury” where some of these losers have over 20 children by multiple women.

Look at it this way. These women don’t use protection because many of them want multiple children. They want about 3 or 4 for EITC, SNAP, bigger/better Section 8 housing, AND court orders for child support from the father. Failing actually monetary support from the father, the next step is SSI for the chilluns....


22 posted on 05/16/2014 11:15:47 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Defendant was heard saying, “No problem, that’s the Biootches job.”


23 posted on 05/16/2014 11:18:18 AM PDT by VRWCarea51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redhawk.44mag

How will they know?


24 posted on 05/16/2014 11:19:22 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

LOL


25 posted on 05/16/2014 11:20:04 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: brooklyn dave

four


26 posted on 05/16/2014 11:20:48 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

No doubt, having 12 little SSI disability checks rolling in a month allows the Babies Momma weekly hair salon visits, pedicure, manicure appointments and (voice of Bob Barker) a BRAND NEW CAR.


27 posted on 05/16/2014 11:22:09 AM PDT by VRWCarea51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Some of these women claim they don’t know who fathered their child. That way they can get welfare and their boyfriend benefits too.


28 posted on 05/16/2014 11:22:21 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

What about the women?


29 posted on 05/16/2014 11:23:35 AM PDT by freerepublicchat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freerepublicchat

You must be one of those Republicans waging war on women for even asking that question./sarc


30 posted on 05/16/2014 11:28:37 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

“Bailiff, Whack his pee pee.”


31 posted on 05/16/2014 11:29:52 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
Jailing him for non-support is fine,although possibly counterproductive.This court order,OTOH,is very probably unconstitutional.
32 posted on 05/16/2014 11:32:19 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party Policy:Lie,Deny,Refuse To Comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

If it keeps going up the judicial ladder, it will never stand. To deny a citizen the right to procreate will not stand. This goes up again the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause. If for some strange and goofy reasoning it does survive, then the gates are opening to be able to simply castrate him and to do other things to prevent a citizen from procreating.


33 posted on 05/16/2014 11:33:11 AM PDT by SgtHooper (This is my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

TAM...

Testicular activity monitor


34 posted on 05/16/2014 11:33:16 AM PDT by redhawk.44mag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

How to videos?


35 posted on 05/16/2014 11:34:24 AM PDT by redhawk.44mag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

They gonna tie a knot in it??


36 posted on 05/16/2014 11:40:27 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

I agree with you, but I also think that a person’s right to procreate doesn’t make it my responsibility as a taxpayer to pay for the child. I’m referring to welfare cases more so than people behind in child support.


37 posted on 05/16/2014 11:42:14 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: redhawk.44mag

You need to patent that idea.


38 posted on 05/16/2014 11:43:29 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: redhawk.44mag

A joke.

The Administration blames military attacks on Youtube video’s.


39 posted on 05/16/2014 11:55:33 AM PDT by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: redhawk.44mag

Please do NOT repeat this idea to Laz.


40 posted on 05/16/2014 11:56:24 AM PDT by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson