Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George Harrison memorial tree killed by... beetles
USA Today ^ | 7/22/14 | USA Today/LA Times

Posted on 07/22/2014 9:44:16 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo

USA Today. No excerpts. Just title and link.

http://www.kare11.com/story/entertainment/music/2014/07/22/george-harrison-memorial-tree-killed-by-beetles/12985001/


TOPICS: Agriculture; Chit/Chat; Gardening; Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: beetles; harrison; oops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
;-(
1 posted on 07/22/2014 9:44:16 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Just guessing George would get a big laugh out of that!


2 posted on 07/22/2014 9:46:38 AM PDT by JennysCool (My hypocrisy goes only so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Article states that “ladybug” beetles and other species killed the tree. Please note that “ladybugs” are carnivorous.


3 posted on 07/22/2014 9:46:44 AM PDT by apoxonu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Japanese beetles?


4 posted on 07/22/2014 9:50:36 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

The Beatles probably smoked as much Malathion and paraquat as anyone in their day.

probably wouldn’t kill these beetles either.

obladi oblada


5 posted on 07/22/2014 9:50:47 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Ono you di’nt.


6 posted on 07/22/2014 9:52:41 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

I was surprised and amazed that he died proactically alone in a hospital bed

The Beatles were a gift from heaven. I wish Paul and John would have worked out their differences and collaborated on more stuff. Seperately they were good, but together the sum was much greater than 4. They each complimented each other and magnified each others brilliance.


7 posted on 07/22/2014 9:52:47 AM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Irony can be pretty ironic sometimes.


8 posted on 07/22/2014 9:53:28 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

The Beatles quit at the perfect time. The Law of Diminishing Returns was setting in big-time on them.


9 posted on 07/22/2014 9:54:30 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
All Things Must Pass
10 posted on 07/22/2014 9:56:57 AM PDT by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
yoko ono photo: Yoko Ono Noize.jpg
11 posted on 07/22/2014 9:57:26 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

RE: George Harrison memorial tree killed by... beetles

Which reminds me of a question I’ve always wanted to ask (now that beetles are killing a Beatle tree :)

Who thought of the name - Beatles anyway, and why?


12 posted on 07/22/2014 9:57:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
excellent point. I cannot bear (bare?) to see what were once my favorite bands now as old dudes wreck those memories. Bare?

Die young and leave a handsome corpse. Was that Jim Morrison? He certainly avoided the diminishing return law.

13 posted on 07/22/2014 10:00:06 AM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

14 posted on 07/22/2014 10:01:15 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

>>Who thought of the name - Beatles anyway, and why?<<

I am sure this “interwebz” thing can answer your question...


15 posted on 07/22/2014 10:02:17 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (AGW "Scientific method:" Draw your lines first, then plot your points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

-— Who thought of the name - Beatles anyway, and why? -—

It could have been worse. They were originally the Quarrymen, and then the Silver Beatles.


16 posted on 07/22/2014 10:02:44 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

I look at the lawn and I see it is burning,,,While My Pesticide Gently Weeps.


17 posted on 07/22/2014 10:02:48 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

‘Beat’

“On March 1957 John Lennon formed a skiffle group called The Quarrymen. Lennon met Paul McCartney on 6 July 1957; Lennon added him to the group a few days later. On 6 February 1958, George Harrison was invited to watch the group.[8] Harrison joined the Quarrymen as lead guitarist after a rehearsal in March 1958.

Lennon and McCartney both played rhythm guitar during that period. After original Quarrymen drummer Colin Hanton left the band in 1959, the band had a high turnover of drummers. Lennon’s friend Stuart Sutcliffe joined on bass in January 1960.

The Quarrymen went through a progression of names, including “Johnny and the Moondogs” and “Long John and The Beatles”. Sutcliffe suggested the name “The Beetles” as a tribute to Buddy Holly and The Crickets. The band changed their name to “The Beatles”.

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090326013510AAnmSrY


18 posted on 07/22/2014 10:07:55 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

She loves trees, yeah, yeah, yeah
And with a love like that
You know you should be glad.


19 posted on 07/22/2014 10:09:01 AM PDT by Autonomous User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Isn’t it good Norwegian Wood?

(Not anymore)


20 posted on 07/22/2014 10:10:42 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson