Posted on 08/06/2014 5:34:26 PM PDT by Morgana
A new report from Georgetown University suggests that public school children should be exposed to sexually explicit sex education at age 10 while their views are still malleable and that schools could lower STD and abortion rates by providing all girls capable of reproduction with contraceptives and safe abortion without parental approval.
The report promotes the sex ed and abortion-on-demand regimen for Very Young Adolescents (VYAs), defined as children between the ages of 10 and 14.
Investing in very young adolescents sexual and reproductive health was written by Susan M. Igras, Marjorie Macieira, Elaine Murphy, and Rebecka Lundgren of the Institute for Reproductive Health at Georgetown University and published in Global Public Health.
According to the researchers, it is unfortunate when children view their parents as the authority on sex.
Younger adolescents see parents as a primary source of information and support, but most parents are ill-equipped to address issues related to puberty, SRH [sexual and reproductive health], and gender roles, and lack communication skills attuned to the young adolescents in their lives, the researchers write. Parental desire to protect their children is often exercised through behavioral regulation and monitoring."
Parents worry that their daughters emerging fertility and sexuality could lead to premarital pregnancy and keep their daughters close to home to ensure safety," the report adds.
The researchers are also concerned that parents teach their children gender-related rules' about behaviors appropriate to each sex, such as when parents begin preparing their daughters for roles as future wives and mothers.
In general, parental and community norms serve to reinforce individuals behaviors and relationships that lead to poor adult SRH, the authors conclude.
They also say parental authority violates VYA rights, such as denying children in the 10-14 age-range birth control and abortion. Advertisement
For those older VYAs who become sexually active, access to contraceptives and safe abortion remains largely unavailable due to regulations requiring parental approval or informal health care policies, they state.
Their proposed public education courses are intended to combat that.
If programs are implemented at a time when adolescents are still malleable and relatively free of sexual and reproductive health problems and gender role biases, very young adolescents can be guided safely through this life stage, the report concludes.
Parental groups said the proposals would harm children and insert the state in the unique relationship of a parent and child.
Concerned Women for America supports reform of public education by returning authority to parents, Alison Howard, communications director for Concerned Women for America, told LifeSiteNews. We should be working toward restoring the quality of education to a level of excellence in academics without governmental mandates that are detrimental to parental rights.
She warned that the report's suggestions of furnishing preteens with birth control and possibly abortion, with or without parental consent, will have serious emotional and physical consequences for young people.
There is no denying the fact that we are in the middle of an STD epidemic, with more than 20 million new STD cases every year - the majority of them affecting 15- to 25-year-olds. Yet supposedly responsible adults still encourage early sexual activity for young boys and girls, she said.
Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE! Advertisement
Her view contrasts with that of leftist publications such as Think Progress, which complains that just 18 states and the District of Columbia require sexual health courses to cover information about birth control. Instead of providing teens with medically accurate information about their bodies, many public school districts still rely on 'abstinence-only' courses.
Sex education is sometimes provided by Planned Parenthood, although a series of exposes have uncovered the organization giving young teens potentially dangerous advice.
Parents are fighting an uphill battle to protect their children from well-funded opponents like Planned Parenthood, who work within schools to infiltrate curricula with an agenda of increased sexual activity for Americas young people. Our schools and our children are not to be used as social experiments, Howard told LifeSiteNews. Concerned Women for America and an alliance of groups including Live Action, Alliance Defending Freedom, and the National Abstinence Education Association are working to draw attention to the emphasis and motives these groups have in targeting the most innocent among us with their message of sexual promiscuity and deterioration of parental involvement.
I wonder if they can afford security guards.
lolz
This is the same crap that the Child Psychology department at the University of Minnestoopid has been pushing for nearly a decade.
Now as for giving birth control pills at such an early age, what health implications are there? I am no doctor, but that is a critical time to go messing with the endocrine system, and this malarkey is for pushing an agenda, not to treat a genuine health issue. But what the hey, we have teachers demanding students be placed on a Schedule II controlled substance, getting away with practicing medicine without a license. This is worse than dealing with a witch doctor!
Lundgren is the ONLY one who’s included on the Institute’s “Our Team.” Here’s here bio:
Rebecka Inga Lundgren, MPH
Director of Research; Research Instructor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgetown University Medical Center
Ms. Lundgren has over 25 years of comprehensive, hands-on experience developing and testing reproductive health and behavior change programs, with particular interest in expanding family planning choice, youth and engaging men in reproductive health. Rebeckas current research interests include systematic approaches to scale-up, social barriers to family planning use and prevention of gender-based violence. As an applied anthropologist, she has expertise applying qualitative and ethnographic methods to her work, and has developed innovative mixed method approaches to evaluate fertility awareness and gender transformation programs for very young adolescents. She received a MPH from UCLAs School of Public Health in the Department of Population and Family Health in 1987, and is currently completing her doctorate in applied anthropology at the University of Maryland.
http://irh.org/about/team/
- See more at: http://irh.org/about/team/#sthash.rphaeagv.dpuf
This ping list is for the other articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. This can occasionally be a fairly high volume list. Articles pinged to the Another Reason to Homeschool List will be given the keyword of ARTH. (If I remember. If I forget, please feel free to add it yourself)
The main Homeschool Ping List handles the homeschool-specific articles. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping list. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from either list, or both.
It sounds like perverts trying to sexualities children so they can then insist the age of consent be lowered. Hang them all. Hands off our children and stay away from their fragile minds.
Sounds like grooming to me. Men who do this would be thrown in the slammer for 20 years. MSnBS had a great series called “To catch a predator” showing these sick people who had been grooming children.
Throw a name like “Planned Parenthood” and approve it by the US government and it’s A OK.
“Parental desire to protect their children is often exercised through behavioral regulation and monitoring.”
“Parents worry that their daughters emerging fertility and sexuality could lead to premarital pregnancy and keep their daughters close to home to ensure safety,” the report adds.
The report authors actually see these as bad things. They should be restricted from contact with minors just like other sexual predators. They must be vying for a job working for Obama’s school safety czar.
“The chicks who wrote this report must be grad students . .”
Maybe, maybe not, but two of the four are employed at Gerorgetown’s “Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
“Georgetown lives its Catholic and Jesuit tradition.” They need to drop the use of the word Catholic, and yes, the Pope is Jesuit.
Also noticed the little nugget: “Georgetown College will offer a new major in justice and peace studies starting this fall . . .”
More of the poison fruit of the Tree of Liberalism.
LOL. Ok, seriously -- in English, just WTF does this mean? (other than "I'm a liberal kook and want your kids sexually available to adult pervs").
I think your translation is spot on.
Another Reason to Homeschool
arth
Georgetown is, at least in name, a Catholic University.....where’s the outrage within the institution for these depraved “experts”???
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Can you imagine if they’d had a photo accompanying the bio? Maybe we don’t want to imagine. Sounds like someone with her very own agenda, and a major university (nominally Catholic, no less!)funding her ‘work.’
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.