Posted on 09/04/2014 9:16:38 AM PDT by westcoastwillieg
'The hardest thing to explain is the glaring evidence which everybody has decided not to see,' this quote from Ayn Rand describes the lackluster reaction to the prez's forged docs—as does the novel 'Scammed' listed in Amazon's Kindle Store.
When the miscreant behind the greatest Ponzi scheme in history, Bernie Madoff, was exposed his name was plastered on the front page of every newspaper in the country and heard on television ad nauseam. But nary a sound is heard from the MSM about the current occupant of the White House's faux documents.
That’s why I’m asking questions.
How was the Malaysian flight invisible to radar for so long?
I agree except I do not believe it is Obama, I believe he is just the stooge being handled by the masked men who are pulling the strings.
His handlers are also handling the news media and many of the people we have in both parties, any one who has not led a perfect life which not many has is open to be controlled by black mail threats.
Can the radar tell the size of the plane? Or could a large plane say they’re a commuter plane on VFR (just make sure they don’t use the callsign for a plane that the particular FAA sector is already monitoring) and then squawk as directed - and go wherever they want to go without raising suspicions at all?
Nancy Pelosi is named as a co-conspirator in Orly Taitz’s Obama eligibility action in Mississippi (Taitz, et. al. v Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee, Obama, Pelosi, et. al.)
The federal judge (Henry T. Wingate) hearing this “Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations” (RICO) Act lawsuit has been sitting on pre-trial motions for more than two years now. This is particularly frustrating because he is a Reagan appointee.
Will be later.
I get the sarcasm, but I don't think it matters anymore, even if there were incontrovertible proof; 50 plus percent of the population would just see it as business as usual and the Republicans are nasty and isn't it wonderfully multicultural to have an alien as President.
Probably. But it will be very destructive to the Dem Party and the left in general.
That’s why I’m asking questions.
How was the Malaysian flight invisible to radar for so long?
><><><><><
Because as far out to sea as it was, it was out of range of radar, which is largely ground based.
Radar does not require an airplane to have a transponder to be tracked.
Transponders also can be turned off. They do not need to be removed.
Any airplane flying in controlled airspace without clearance and a transponder code will be intercepted and possibly be shot down.
Not a traffic control radar.
I will have to think about the other question ... IFF is not my specialty ...
Thanks. That makes sense.
Do you know anything about the hole in our southern-facing radar? Specifically, what kind of vulnerability does that create?
No. I’m just spouting stuff I’ve heard or read.
What is IFF? Governmental acronyms are enough to drive me crazy. lol
I guess I’m wondering if the difficulty that these terrorist groups would have in using these planes however they wanted to is that the planes have something (transponder or whatever...) that functions like a license plate - something that would identify them on radar as the stolen aircraft so that the FAA would immediately send the military after the aircraft. And if so, is there a way they can defeat that identification - like putting a different “license plate” on the plane or posing as a plane that doesn’t need to be identified beyond what it’s ordered to squawk so it doesn’t get into trouble because it’s got FAA authorization under VFR rules.
IFF = “Identification Friend or Foe”
Q. What is IFF and how does it work?
A. With supersonic aircraft and swift antiaircraft missiles, there is no time to identify friendly forces by visual means. IFF (Identification Friend or Foe) is an electronic system which can determine the intent of an aircraft with the speed of the fastest computer. A related system is used for air traffic control at civilian airports.
Wiki has basic info but consulting Dr. Google will prove fruitful.
If they simultaneously detonated nukes over the precise locations necessary to shut down the electric grid they could impact the whole nation just as if it was a big EMP attack. Actually probably even more effectively because they could hit Texas at the same time as everybody else; IIRC Texas has its own separate grid.
I’m told that around the same time as a nuke was shipped from NV to the east coast where an insider said it was supposed to be detonated over Charleston(?) but was instead dropped into the Atlantic and detonated (and the people who oversaw that process were axed shortly thereafter)... about 8 nukes went “missing” from TX. Sort of how the Manpads, planes, etc went “missing” from Libya, perhaps with a little help from the communist wing of the CIA - perhaps enabled by Brennan’s NSA snooping on David Petraeus which perhaps allowed Brennan (the commander of the communist/Islamist wing of the CIA) to call the shots in Benghazi while Petraeus took the fall for it...
If the insider is correct and Obama intended to detonate a nuke over Charleston but found that his military leaders were too patriotic to go through with it, then perhaps the 8 nukes going “missing” from Texas were a way to get the nukes to Mexico where the Holder-armed cartels are working with Islamist terrorists to try to get access to America.
Get those planes together with those nukes and the terrorists have exactly what they need, to destroy America.
Take off from a country that sympathizes with them - like maybe Venezuela, which has ALREADY shown its willingness to let Hamas and Hezbollah operatives into their country on UNCHECKED flights. IOW, Venezuela’s aviation system already seems to have worked with the Islamists. So planes take off from Venezuela and head in different directions to different US destinations. The Venezuelan FAA hands these planes off to US FAA with authorizations as if everything is fine, the planes go to the cities they say they’re headed to, and when they get there they blow up the nukes in each of the planes.
What would stop it?
“What would stop it?”
What HAS stopped it to date is the fear that foreign governments have of mutually assured destruction.
For example:
The United States Navy has 14 nuclear submarines currently armed with Trident II missiles. The 14 Trident II ballistic missile submarines carry approximately fifty percent of the total U.S. active inventory of strategic thermonuclear warheads.
Americans will care when resident Obama's "pacification police" occupy their neighborhoods and confiscate their guns and ammo.
And another conspiracy theory takes it’s baby steps. Oh boy.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
If analyzing vulnerabilities makes a person a conspiracy theorist, then every person in this world is a conspiracy theorist except those who are in la-la land. What’s the weather like in la-la land these days?
Please don’t answer; it was a rhetorical question and I’m not really interested in conversing with people from la-la land. Especially when their stupidity is going to cost all the rest of us the free world.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.