Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is FreeRepublic Pro Harry Reid?
Vanity | 9/17/2014 | Vanity

Posted on 09/17/2014 4:36:52 PM PDT by Kansas58

A very disturbing number of Freepers are openly advocating, on Free Republic threads, for the defeat of Senator Pat Roberts and other good Conservative Republicans. Greg Orman, in Kansas, is a pro abortion, anti gun, tax and spend Liberal Democrat who has given tens of thousands of dollars to Obama and Pelosi and the Democrat Party and Harry Reid. I am called an "idiot" for supporting Roberts. However, I think that those on Free Republic who support Harry Reid and Greg Orman should be ZOTTED, kicked off the site. I have had enough of there hate filled, vindictive, misguided trash.


TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister; Free Republic Policy/Q&A
KEYWORDS: abortion; banglist; cryingboehnors; dancingwiththedead; elections; faq; gregorman; harryreid; harryreidmajority; kansas; litterboxthread; obamacare; patroberts; rinokansas; their; trolls; uniparty; ursulathevk; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 901-916 next last
To: KC_Lion

He thinks this GOP is more conservative than that of Reagan’s admin. What does that tell you?


81 posted on 09/17/2014 5:10:44 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
you are a liar

Orman is a DEMOCRAT

82 posted on 09/17/2014 5:10:55 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
There is no democrat running for the Kansas seat.

On that point you are quite wrong on several counts. Chad Taylor won the Democrat primary and is the Democrat candidate. The Kansas Supreme Court is probably going to remove him from the ballot at his request, but they haven't done it yet.

Greg Orman is running as the Independent candidate, but he is no such thing. He is a Democrat, has the blessing of the Democrat Party leadership, and is committing a fraud on the people of Kansas.

83 posted on 09/17/2014 5:11:21 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

Which is why I said, as begrudgingly as I can, Kansans should vote for Roberts. The same does not hold true in Kentucky and Mississippi.

Tennessee and South Carolina aren’t competitive enough for it to make any difference whatever your opinion.


84 posted on 09/17/2014 5:11:35 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
You can't be serious!
Have you not read?

What a DISAPPOINTMENT!
Compromisers ALWAYS LOSE !

"Establishment Republicans" lose everytime they're listened to.
They wouldn't care if they DO lose.
If they can't be in power, they don't want US in power.
It's just that simple.
It's WAR!

We will never unify under "Establishment Republicans" .
"Establishment Republicans" have more in common with the Democrats, than they do with Conservatives.
The weak candidates are "Establishment Republicans", weak on national security, amnesty for illegals, abortion, and government spending.
"Establishment Republicans" scream "COMPROMISE".
And people who study the Bible know that COMPROMISE almost always leads to destruction.
Someone once said [We're] 'Not victims of "the Establishment." '
I disagree.
I ask you again: It WAS Mitt Romney, leader of the "Establishment Republicans"
and it WAS the "Establishment Republicans" who funded all those negative ads against Conservatives.

So conservatives, the BASE of the Republican Party, WERE ' victims of "the Establishment." '

These "Establishment Republicans" are being weeded out, one by one, and slowly but surely, the TEA Party is taking over.

"Establishment Republicans" Want to Redefine the Term "Conservative"
DO CONSERVATIVES "ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS" WANT TO WIN IN 2014 OR NOT?

Jack Kerwick wrote an article on May 24, 2011 titled The Tea Partier versus The Republican and he expressed some important issues that I agree with.


I'm fresh out of "patience", and I'm not in the mood for "compromise".
"COMPROMISE" to me is a dirty word.
Let the RINO's compromise their values, with the conservatives, for a change.
Take a good long look at where "Establishment Republicans" ALWAYS take us.



The "Establishment Republicans" can GO TO HELL !

85 posted on 09/17/2014 5:12:16 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

Yes, Roberts supports the Party Platform State and National.


86 posted on 09/17/2014 5:12:49 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Not really sure what you’re worried about. After all, you got all the candidates you wanted, right? The “electable” ones?

Just leave the conservatives alone. I’m sure you’ll breeze to victory.


87 posted on 09/17/2014 5:12:59 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

I love Harry Read and I would be his lover, if I were gay!


88 posted on 09/17/2014 5:13:10 PM PDT by big bad easter bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
http://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/election/article1447177.html

"The race for U.S. Senate in Kansas no longer has a Democrat in it. In a stunning development, candidate Chad Taylor asked Wednesday that his name be removed from the ballot, paving the way for independent candidate Greg Orman to face U.S. Sen. Pat Roberts head-on in November."

89 posted on 09/17/2014 5:13:22 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
Because there's a Ruling Class in Washington now.

Republicans are to Democrats what Chihuahuas sitting in expensive designer purses are to rich California valley girls. They want some of the action too, and to be petted and fed by their leftist media masters when they speak out against those other Republicans who "move too far to the right."

90 posted on 09/17/2014 5:13:50 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

So what exactly is your strategy for doing that now that the primaries are over?


Every election cycle we’ve had GOPe meddling in the primaries. Each cycle we hear “you still have to vote for the GOP candidate or you’ll make baby Jesus sad.”

I voted GOP in the last two presidential races but never again. I’m through voting RINO.

It’s always been, “we’ll fix it later.” Guess what, we should have fixed it sooner because now it’s later.

The only way to fix it is to reject the candidates clearly involved with the Mississippi primary fraud. If we continue to allow the GOPe to screw us over they’ll never stop screwing us over.


91 posted on 09/17/2014 5:14:10 PM PDT by Rides_A_Red_Horse (Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

It tells me he does not know his history, among other things.


92 posted on 09/17/2014 5:14:31 PM PDT by tennmountainman (True conservatives don't like being rained on by their own party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

“Greg Orman is running as the Independent candidate, but he is no such thing. He is a Democrat, has the blessing of the Democrat Party leadership, and is committing a fraud on the people of Kansas.”

What’s your view on lifelong democrat Mike Bloomberg serving as the mayor of NYC having run on the Republican ticket?


93 posted on 09/17/2014 5:14:34 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Huh?
You pretend to be an expert on logic, in other threads.

Tell me how your post makes any sense?

Roberts is VERY Pro Life and has been Pro Life even before the prolife movement got its act together.

Orman the Democrat (fake indy) is Pro Abortion to the core!

94 posted on 09/17/2014 5:14:44 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan; GeronL

Not supporting the RINO does not equal supporting a liberal.
RINOs tend to be liberal, see Mitt Romney for an example of a liberal wearing an R label.
If Boehner et al cannot take a stand against liberal Obama, they wouldn’t take a stand against liberal Romney.
In other words, many of the current crop of elected reps AGREE WHOLE HEARTEDLY with the “new direction” our country is going in under liberal leadership, and will do their best to make certain conservatives are not represented at all.
Except to play to us when they want our votes!
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3204934/posts

So your answer is to support, say, Romney who is ideologically the same as his opponent?
Show me how the RINOs are any different from the Dems?
When have they supported US in any meaningful way except to do token useless actions that they knew were futile so they could say “Well, we triiiieid, honest!”


95 posted on 09/17/2014 5:15:32 PM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee! First one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: america-rules
There’s a ton of fake freepers who post

I often wonder about that. Once in a while, I see what looks like someone trying to bait a racist comment or something, and makes me go hmmmmm.....

96 posted on 09/17/2014 5:15:48 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
Imagine what the US Senate would be like if EVERY Democrat was replaced by someone as conservative as Pat Roberts -—

Do that and you see how ridiculous the pro Harry Reid, Pro Orman Freepers really are!

97 posted on 09/17/2014 5:15:55 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Yeah, hey, if you can convince Cochran and Mitch to resign, I will take it back and be 100% with you. And if they refuse, you know who the real enemies are.


But they’re so darned electable! Don’t you want electable candidates?

Look at the sparkly things! Stop thinking for your self and look at the sparkly things!


98 posted on 09/17/2014 5:16:45 PM PDT by Rides_A_Red_Horse (Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Considering it already is a bit of a flame thread, it might either turn into a bugzapper, OR be more useful as litterbox fill.
I can see no purpose for this thread except to stir up crap.
*Magic 8 ball says “circular file”*


99 posted on 09/17/2014 5:17:41 PM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee! First one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Ok, riddle me this.

Did Pat Roberts vote for Sebelius’s confirmation? Was he totally in the dark about her being close buddies with Tiller the Killer? What was the ‘special relationship’ that Roberts said he had with Sebelius, buddy of Tiller the Killer?


100 posted on 09/17/2014 5:18:36 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 901-916 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson