Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To Vote or Not to Vote

Posted on 09/18/2014 8:50:20 AM PDT by jstaff

With the mid-terms close by I am hearing more and more that I should just not vote for Tom Tillis or any other Republican incumbent that defeated a Tea Party challenger in their primary. I should not support the Rovians. Mitch McConnell should be defeated by a Dem to teach him a lesson. I must be a closet liberal, American Constitution hating Democrat to even consider such a thing. Some with that view pop up on FR regularly to tell me to stay home on election day to teach the moderates R's a lesson by letting the D's win.

For what it's worth, I consider myself a social and fiscal conservative. I believe in the Constitution and the importance of the rule of law. I am also a pragmatist on election day. I firmly support the idea that when the best is not available we need to choose the least bad option, holding our noses if we need to. To simply not vote is to concede the debate to the other side, something that I am not going to do. While I can understand, if not approve, this idea on an emotional basis I just don't understand it on a logical, rational level.

In my view, anyone who claims any sort of conservative label and stands loudly and firmly behind the idea that we should just let the libs take charge does so for one of only four reasons:

1. They are ignorant. They just haven't noticed what is going on around them.

2. They are stupid. They see everything that is going on, they don't like it, but they just don't have the intellectual ability to figure out what is causing it.

3. They are fools. They know what is going on around them, they realize it is bad and they know what is causing it. They take an emotional approach to decision making, however, because their fav didn't win the primary and this is their way getting back at the bully who gave them a big boo-boo.

4. They are liars. They are really playing for the other side and this is just another tool they use to discourage us from voting.

If there is a reasoned, non-emotional argument to support the stay home approach to elections I would very much like to read it. Until I do I will continue to encourage everyone to forget this all-or-none attitude. Everyone makes choices in their life, every day, that reflect a personal compromise between what they would like to happen vs what they can realistically make happen. You do the best you can do for yourself at the time. There is no reason that electing the leadership of the entire nation should be treated differently.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-125 next last
To: jstaff
Whatever differences many may have with Speaker Tillis, the go or no-go issue for he and the rest of the new Republican majority "running things" at the NC General Assembly for me was Voter ID. That was my litmus test, at least, and they did finally get the bill passed.

And I fully understand his GOP primary opponent's supporters feelings, but I can't be persuaded yet Tillis presents any clear and present danger to American nationalism, or at the very least any similar danger clearly posed by Kay Hagan, whom I watched closely perform as a puppet of the national and state Democrats when she served in the NC Senate.

I would vote for a Yellow Dog before I'd vote for Kay Hagan, who will definitely cause me continued loss of sleep representing North Carolina in Washington through the end of this decade.

She should never have been elected to the U.S. Senate, and wouldn't have if Elizabeth Dole had not proven out to be one of the most incompetent U.S. Senate prima donnas when she ran a half-assed re-election campaign six years ago.

Mrs. Dole --- "Jimmy Carter with Helmet Hair" -- that's a RINO. Tillis may owe fealty to a lot of groups and people I am definitely more than "at odds" with, but he's also no fool.

Kay Hagan, on the other hand, needs to be sent back to the Greensboro Junior League where she belongs --- ASAP.

61 posted on 09/18/2014 10:17:47 AM PDT by Prospero (Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dware
Where was I living in 2000-2006, when the R’s had control of the House, Senate AND WH, and did NOTHING with it.

GOPe - Conservatives = Whigs. The GOPe is DEAD.

62 posted on 09/18/2014 10:19:35 AM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn
I can understand their passion.
But they trust LIARS!
And they expect us too ?

NO MORE!
NOT ONE DAMN PENNY'S WORTH !

63 posted on 09/18/2014 10:21:00 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth

That’s not true and you know it. They passed TARP, and expanded Medicare. Because, you know, those RHINOs are so conservative.


64 posted on 09/18/2014 10:23:20 AM PDT by Drrdot (Ban murder, not guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jstaff
Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.

If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it."

Mark Twain -


65 posted on 09/18/2014 10:23:31 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn
you are hardly “tea party all the way” when you shill for democrats running as republicans.

Just answer one simple queston:

Do you want the Dems or the GOP to control the Senate in 2015?

Or do you care given your view that there really isn't any difference?

66 posted on 09/18/2014 10:24:12 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Remember Mississippi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Drrdot

I say again. Not one dime’s worth of difference.


67 posted on 09/18/2014 10:25:51 AM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
Do you want the Dems or the GOP to control the Senate in 2015?

I want Conservatives running the Senate. If we can't do that with the current slate of (so called) R's, then put the Democrats in place, let em run it into the ground and spark the next reformation.

68 posted on 09/18/2014 10:26:24 AM PDT by dware (3 prohibited topics in mixed company: politics, religion and operating systems...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
That quote ... It reminds me of a new tactic in STEAL VOTES BEFORE WE VOTE.

Here is a MUST WATCH VIDEO about STEALING ELECTIONS !
Make sure you tell ALL your acquaintances to watch it, and watch it RIGHT NOW !
69 posted on 09/18/2014 10:30:31 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
Sure, throw your vote away.

Bob Dole for President! Woo! Woo!

John McCain for President! Woo! Woo!

Mitt Romney for President! Woo! Woo!


70 posted on 09/18/2014 10:30:34 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jstaff
Voter participation, and the right to vote, both are used to justify whatever action the government decides to make. The right to vote is basically a device used to channel dissent. You have a right to vote, which substitutes for a right to complain or even disobey. The vote is used to legitimize the government, even when it acts in an illegitimate fashion.

None of that justifies not voting, rather to illuminate that the value of the vote is negligible. Those who don't vote aren't throwing away much of anything. The people essentially no control over the federal government, which is so far outside its constitutional boundaries to be reasonably viewed as illegitimate. The government rules by force, not by consent. The vote is there to fool them into thinking they have a meaningful voice, and to empower the government to make the claim that it governs by the consent of the governed (see "right to vote.")

The calculus I describe is associated with universal suffrage, and putting a high value on universal suffrage.

71 posted on 09/18/2014 10:31:52 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
-- Only one Republican (Joseph Cao, LA) voted for Obamacare. Every other Republican in the House and Senate, RINO and non-RINO) voted AGAINST Obamacare. Had the Congress had more Republicans, RINO and non-RINO, at the time there would be no Obamacare today. --

The GOP offered its version of Obamacare as an alternative to Hillarycare, back in the day. Both parties in the federal government are determined to expand the scope of federal influence.

72 posted on 09/18/2014 10:34:01 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
A Republican usually won’t vote against our gun rights.

Nope, but maybe they will appropriate the money to buy up the ammo supply. Or some other back door plan to make it impossible for you to actually exercise your right.

Notice that Boehner and Pelosie got together to pass a CR that fully funds Planned Parenthood, Obamacare and fund the terrorists in Syria until December, which gives the defeated members one last chance to screw over the people before the New Congress is seated.

“Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.”

-- John Quincy Adams

If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it."

Mark Twain -


73 posted on 09/18/2014 10:40:38 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
Had the Congress had more Republicans, RINO and non-RINO, at the time there would be no Obamacare today.

You delude yourself. The reason every RINO voted against ObamaCare is because it didn't matter. Remember if you will how it ever got to the Senate floor for a vote, in the first place.

74 posted on 09/18/2014 10:56:33 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jstaff
"If there is a reasoned, non-emotional argument to support the stay home approach to elections I would very much like to read it."

Perhaps this suggestion fails to meet the "non-emotional argument" point; however, given the obviously immediate threats to life and liberty under the present Administration and its partisan Democrats, it may tip the scales for voting for a less-than-perfect candidate in order to, perhaps, buy time before Constitutional restraints on government power are abolished and individual liberty is back to Old World, and pre-1776 levels:

Look into the innocent face of your child, grandchild, or neighbor's child, and then convince yourself that sitting out this election will give that child a better chance at future life, liberty and happiness than would your going to the polls and considering that your vote might be against another rubber stamp for the president's policies and a delay against "approaching tyranny."

75 posted on 09/18/2014 10:58:08 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy
We have a bill in the Senate to limit free speech,

A bill that has Zero chance of becoming law, no matter who controls the Senate and you know it.

76 posted on 09/18/2014 11:03:39 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dware
Here I was expecting immigration reform, reduced spending, balanced budgets, etc., which is why I worked so hard for the R’s in 2000. Won’t make that mistake again!

Remember this one from John McCain?

If they want a fence we will build a g-d d@mn fence.

77 posted on 09/18/2014 11:09:48 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: dware
I want Conservatives running the Senate. If we can't do that with the current slate of (so called) R's, then put the Democrats in place, let em run it into the ground and spark the next reformation.

That is an honorable idea. But, IMHO, totally impractical.

So a question: How long do you think it will take if your scenario play out: Dems run it into the ground, country comes to it's senses, we vote in a solid block of conservatives in both the House and the Senate.

BTW, who doesn't hope for that scenario given the fact that, IMHO, the Dems have already run us into the ground?

But ... how long do you think this will take if we follow your advice?

78 posted on 09/18/2014 11:11:09 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Remember Mississippi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jstaff

Who ultimate benefits most by your vote (or non vote)?


79 posted on 09/18/2014 11:11:36 AM PDT by DesertSapper (Becoming more libertarian (small 'l') by the day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prospero
Republicans are making a serious mistake by not hammering Hagan's unqualified participation in and outright enthusiastic support of Obamacare and its campaign of lies and misrepresentations!

The milktoast ads currently being run for Tillis by the U. S. Chamber and others may allow the teachers' union's misrepresentations of his actions to prevail in the public mind and result in Hagan keeping her seat.

Hagan lied about the reasons for supporting the Trojan Horse for unfettered government power over individuals and the taking of the fruits of their labors. She participated in the lies which Democrats used for justifying that economic power grab, such as claiming that patients with cancer could not get insurance in the pre-Obamacare marketplace, and she, along with Pelosi and Reid and their President, lied when they assured citizens that "if you like your . . . , you can keep . . . ."

Every day between now and Election Day every citizen should have those quotes and the disastrous results we're now seeing and will continue to see blaring from every radio and TV set.

Instead, they're seeing nice little soft ads for her opponent about his work history.

Cancer patients, last year, many of whom had purchased policies since their diagnosis, and were happy with those insurance policies, were forced to spend their last Thanksgiving/Christmas Season online searching for new coverage, all because their insurance carrier was forced by the "rules of the so-called "Affordable" Care Act" to cancel the perfectly good policy they then held. This is a sad fact which few are talking about and one which should lie at the feet of Senators like Kay Hagan!

80 posted on 09/18/2014 11:13:17 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson