Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Future Smartphones Won’t Need Cell Towers to Connect
MIT Technology Review ^ | September 29, 2014 | Tom Simonite

Posted on 09/30/2014 10:44:32 AM PDT by Utilizer

A new feature being added to the LTE protocol that smartphones use to communicate with cellular towers will make it possible to bypass those towers altogether. Phones will be able to “talk” directly to other mobile devices and to beacons located in shops and other businesses.

Known as LTE Direct, the wireless technology has a range of up to 500 meters, far more than either Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. It is included in update to the LTE standard slated for approval this year, and devices capable of LTE Direct could appear as soon as late 2015.

LTE Direct has been pioneered by Qualcomm, which has been working on the technology for around seven years. At the mobile chip manufacturer’s Uplinq conference in San Francisco this month, it announced that it’s helping partners including Facebook and Yahoo experiment with the technology.

Researchers are, for example, testing LTE Direct as a way to allow smartphones to automatically discover nearby people, businesses, and other information. Some see the technology as a potential new channel for targeted promotions or advertising.

(Excerpt) Read more at technologyreview.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Science
KEYWORDS: cellphones; communications; smartphones; towers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Seems to be an area that could use a bit more research to determine its feasibility.

I would be concerned, first off, as to whether or not this would be used for more detailed tracking purposes, and not just by governmental types.

1 posted on 09/30/2014 10:44:32 AM PDT by Utilizer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Utilizer
Future Smartphones Won’t Need Cell Towers to Connect

You'll be able to get your service contract directly through the NSA.

2 posted on 09/30/2014 10:52:30 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (I want a Speaker who'll stick that pen and phone where no one but Reggie Love can find it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer

I imagine this is why Comcast wanted to give passing third-parties access to your home wireless router.


3 posted on 09/30/2014 10:54:31 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Considering that the ‘doze OS appears to already have an NSA backdoor key already installed, I believe that to already be the case for quite a few people.


4 posted on 09/30/2014 10:55:01 AM PDT by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the muzlims trying to kill them-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer

It appears to be a VOIP via wireless to the nearest link to the internet. There are already MVNOs doing this via wifi.

Thing is, who picks up the tab for the eventual internet connection?


5 posted on 09/30/2014 10:55:06 AM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrench

I dunno, but two days ago T-mobile ran an ad that said LTE is here, and sure enough I enabled wireless on my phone and it immediately connected to a local wifi, for calling and texting even though my cell tower signal is much stronger. You’d think LTE would evaluate signal strength and stick with the tower instead of running to somebody’s wifi router.


6 posted on 09/30/2014 10:59:30 AM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer
A direct connection from phone to phone? It may happen but registration with a cell tower will still be required. The NSA will see to that. Otherwise, those two phones connected directly would bypass their efforts at interception of communications.

Oh noes! Think of what the terrorists could do with that!

7 posted on 09/30/2014 10:59:50 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Everyone's got a plan 'til they get punched in the mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer
If everyone plays nice this could be great.

Every cell phone doubles as a cell tower.

However, are the phone companies going to pay you any money for helping them route other peoples' information through your phone?

Also, we've heard about hackers creating fake cell towers. It should be even easier to create fake LTE's that can scan lots of data as it passes through.

And if you don't have the latest/greatest phone you may never be able to use it if it is constantly being bogged down by other peoples' traffic.

8 posted on 09/30/2014 11:00:41 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer

Sounds great if you live in a heavily populated area. Not so much if you value rural life.


9 posted on 09/30/2014 11:01:30 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Ha ha Ha ha ha! Comment of the day!


10 posted on 09/30/2014 11:04:03 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer

It’s freaking wrong.

What Sprint is essentially doing is off loading their network to others and reduce congestion.

So many privacy issues with this...


11 posted on 09/30/2014 11:05:32 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Yup! When we added phone to our Comcast they sent an Arris modem/router. I already had a separate modem and Netgear router setup in the back bedroom. On that was Wifi for the bac and a guest network, both pw protected.

Now I have the Xfnity wifi in LR along with the Xfinity third - party thing.

That HAS to be slowing down our net feed although Comcast did boost us from (dependable) 15-20mbps to 35-50 mbps.

I have heard that even our old pipeline that Copmcast said was impossible to update without total rewire DID have a 100+mbps capacity so maybe we won’t slow down.

Still I am not comfortable with the third party thing.


12 posted on 09/30/2014 11:08:07 AM PDT by prisoner6 (Stop the Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer

Nice, a built in walke-talki app.I love it.


13 posted on 09/30/2014 11:09:26 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

That’s what I’ve thought, it’s just walkie-talkie.


14 posted on 09/30/2014 11:11:11 AM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer
Phones will be able to “talk” directly to other mobile devices and to beacons located in shops and other businesses.

The NSA will not like this, unless they can find a way to jack in.

15 posted on 09/30/2014 11:13:10 AM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
Nice, a built in walke-talki app.I love it.

My first impression too. Useful feature if you're out camping and out of cell range, to keep in touch with your immediate group.
16 posted on 09/30/2014 11:13:44 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer

” You have exceeded your allotted connection cap. You will now be charged $1.95 for every connection you make. please refer to out TOS...thank you”


17 posted on 09/30/2014 11:15:59 AM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
Also, we've heard about hackers creating fake cell towers.

I think it was already determined that those towers were put up by some Governmental Unnamed Agency or more than one.

18 posted on 09/30/2014 11:20:03 AM PDT by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the muzlims trying to kill them-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

I swear one of the earlier cell phone models had a walkie talkie mode.


19 posted on 09/30/2014 11:21:19 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer

LTE stands for long-term evolution.

Part of that evolution for ALL the carriers is moving to an all IP infrastructure and delivery model.

The GSM “4G” model of today will be sunset.

The ‘physical layer’ of Wi-Fi or cell tower connectivity will become moot, because both will be an IP connection.

The model will move off of ‘minutes’ of usage, and on to amount of data.

Just the next model.


20 posted on 09/30/2014 11:21:25 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson