Skip to comments.
'Science shattered': Hand of God suddenly revealed?
http://www.wnd.com/2014/11/science-shattered-hand-of-god-suddenly-revealed/ ^
| 11-16-2014
| Drew Zahn
Posted on 11/18/2014 5:34:10 AM PST by UMCRevMom@aol.com
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
Increasingly, bizarre and unproven theories such as the mysterious dark matter, dark energy, multiverses and the creation of everything from nothing, the moviemakers claim, have been thought up to try to make the hard data fit with an underlying assumption science has accepted since the 16th century.Wait. You mean the science on whether or not the Earth is moving through space hasn't been settled even after 500 years?
21
posted on
11/18/2014 6:35:55 AM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: BenLurkin
It is true to say everything in the universe is pointing towards the Earth. It's equally true to say I'm the center of the universe.
The universe started as a singularity, and it's expanding from EVERY point in it. So, everywhere in the universe is the center of the universe.
22
posted on
11/18/2014 6:36:13 AM PST
by
MMaschin
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
See “Michaelson Morley Experiment” for more about this scientific classic.
23
posted on
11/18/2014 6:36:30 AM PST
by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: central_va
Trying to fathom this real quick.
I’m assuming first that “weight” of the moon actually was “mass” of the moon.
Known mass of the earth.
Known period of orbit of the moon.
Might be able to get it from there...
Might need distance from the earth to the moon...
24
posted on
11/18/2014 6:40:13 AM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
I’d like to see this documentary sometime.
To: ShadowAce
1) If you don’t specify a reference point, I get to do that.
2) Even if your reference point is the Horsehead Nebula, the weight of the Moon is still not zero. It may be smaller than your error bar, but it’s still not zero. Fg=G*Mm*Mhhn*R^-2
To: BenLurkin
[T]he documentary makes the case that the data science is discovering indicate the entire known universe is pointing directly at Earth.IF the UNIVERSE is INFINITE , then you can pick any point in it, and the entire 'known' universe is pointing at it.
27
posted on
11/18/2014 6:41:55 AM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: NorthMountain
2) Even if your reference point is the Horsehead Nebula, the weight of the Moon is still not zero. It may be smaller than your error bar, but its still not zero. Fg=G*Mm*Mhhn*R^-2 LOL! Granted.
28
posted on
11/18/2014 6:42:23 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: BenLurkin
Gods creation is very real, and we are all in it both physically as well as spiritually.
Yes. That is why we are both “natural man” and “spiritual man”. But the natural man is the “tent” our spirit occupies. It is a biological machine into which we have been injected for our brief time on this planet.
29
posted on
11/18/2014 6:42:30 AM PST
by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
I’d guess the movie is an exploration of the anthropic principle. Whether or not it is well done, I have no idea.
30
posted on
11/18/2014 6:43:28 AM PST
by
sphinx
To: BenLurkin
Gods creation is very real, and we are all in it both physically as well as spiritually.
Yes. That is why we are both “natural man” and “spiritual man”. But the natural man is the “tent” our spirit occupies. It is a biological machine into which we have been injected for our brief time on this planet.
When it dies, we all go on. At the white throne judgement, some of the “spiritual men” go on to eternal life in Christ, and the rest are finally destroyed for good.
31
posted on
11/18/2014 6:43:47 AM PST
by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: central_va
Calculate the weight of the moonThe moon has no specific weight. Mass and density, yes, but weight is dependent on where you put the moon while you weigh it.
32
posted on
11/18/2014 6:44:58 AM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: MMaschin
Bingo. You beat me to it.
That singularity, commonly known as the Big Bang, btw is exactly what we would expect to see today if Genesis 1:1 were literally true.
To: BenLurkin
34
posted on
11/18/2014 6:46:51 AM PST
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
So that means that our whole solar system could be one tiny atom in the fingernail of some other giant being. And one tiny atom in my fingernail could be one little tiny universe.
35
posted on
11/18/2014 6:51:43 AM PST
by
Ken H
(What happens on the internet stays on the internet.)
To: central_va
C_V - Just a friendly chops-busting from someone that went through similar classes...
Best
36
posted on
11/18/2014 6:53:56 AM PST
by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: newfreep
The mass of the a$$ is directly proportional to the heat of the meat provided the angle of the dangle remains constant.
37
posted on
11/18/2014 6:57:01 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: central_va
LOL - post of the day!
Well played!
38
posted on
11/18/2014 7:01:10 AM PST
by
newfreep
("Evil succeeds when good men do nothting" - Edmund Burke)
To: BenLurkin
Cosmic solipsism. Assuming this theory to be true frees up a heck of a lot of time for better activities.
39
posted on
11/18/2014 7:20:20 AM PST
by
dagogo redux
(A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
To: central_va
Mass vs. Weight has been pointed out already by many. In a biology class I was once asked to list the causes of old age. I wrote,
“1) Being born early
2) Not dying yet.”
Professor Roos marked me wrong but I argued my way to getting it marked correct. He meant “causes” but I pointed out that a man of science should never confuse cause and effect. He agreed, grudgingly.
40
posted on
11/18/2014 7:23:24 AM PST
by
muir_redwoods
("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson