Skip to comments.
The hyper-real robots that will replace receptionists, pop stars... and even sex dolls: Unnervingly
dailymail.co.uk ^
Posted on 11/21/2014 2:23:17 PM PST by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-188 next last
To: EEGator; KC_Lion; Darksheare
ever seen “Natural City”?
There are scenes of the robot girl factory, these girls come with expiration dates when they need to be replaced.
Some try to not be replaced.
21
posted on
11/21/2014 2:46:24 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: shibumi
22
posted on
11/21/2014 2:46:40 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: Norm Lenhart
23
posted on
11/21/2014 2:47:28 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: BenLurkin
I can't see paying umpteen thousands of dollars to replace a perfectly usable inflatable doll.
In a purely hypothetical sense, of course.
To: Army Air Corps
25
posted on
11/21/2014 2:48:51 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: BenLurkin; Larry Lucido; F15Eagle
26
posted on
11/21/2014 2:50:00 PM PST
by
Gamecock
(USA, Ret. 27 years.)
To: GeronL
Well, you get complete insanity either way so what the hell ;)
To: Norm Lenhart
Early in the 21st century THE TYRELL CORPORATION advanced Robot evolution into the NEXUS phase - a being virtually identical to a human - known as a Replicant.
The Nexus 6 Replicants were superior in strength and agility, and at least equal in intelligence, to the genetic engineers who created them.
To: catnipman
When it’s your time to go, it’s your time to go. And there are worse ways to go...
To: Sawdring
30
posted on
11/21/2014 2:52:40 PM PST
by
Rocko
To: BigEdLB
31
posted on
11/21/2014 2:54:10 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: GeronL
32
posted on
11/21/2014 2:54:44 PM PST
by
EEGator
To: EEGator
For the love of God, DO NOT click the link in the article to the “Japanese toy company”.
What has been seen can never be unseen.
33
posted on
11/21/2014 2:58:52 PM PST
by
Salamander
(My soul's on fire.)
To: Billthedrill
I can't see paying umpteen thousands of dollars to replace a perfectly usable inflatable doll. In a purely hypothetical sense, of course.
Says a guy who calls himself 'Billthedrill'..... HAHAHAHAHA! Ok, Shawna, stop it. Get yer mind out the gutter....
To: Norm Lenhart
35
posted on
11/21/2014 2:59:22 PM PST
by
Salamander
(My soul's on fire.)
To: BenLurkin
Sherry Jackson in Star Trek. What was her name?
Andrea I think.
36
posted on
11/21/2014 3:00:54 PM PST
by
yarddog
(Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
To: Oberon
In spite of Ford’s mind-numbing flat affect delivery, it was a good movie.
Heavy, even.
37
posted on
11/21/2014 3:01:44 PM PST
by
Salamander
(My soul's on fire.)
To: EEGator
I only saw the first 10 minutes, it looked like good quality scifi to me
38
posted on
11/21/2014 3:01:48 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: BenLurkin
39
posted on
11/21/2014 3:02:19 PM PST
by
yarddog
(Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
To: shibumi
40
posted on
11/21/2014 3:03:16 PM PST
by
Salamander
(My soul's on fire.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-188 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
