Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Notwithstanding What Bill Nye Says, the Sun is Not an "Unremarkable" Star
Evolution News and Views ^ | December 1, 2014 | Daniel Bakken

Posted on 12/01/2014 6:50:42 AM PST by Heartlander

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Heartlander
Remarkably quiescent and hospitable to its remarkable third planet and Moon, the latter just scale to cast its shadow on the former, focused with a finer point than any razor's edge.

A star that's almost a secret, almost well-hidden in the kosmos at large. It's invisible to the naked unaided human eye only fifty light years away.

21 posted on 12/01/2014 8:03:09 AM PST by Prospero (Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
2. A photon generated by the act of fusion takes almost a million years to travel from the core of the Sun to the surface. Just...damn.

Would that make the sun 2 million light years across? Kinda big. Only takes that photon 8 minutes and change to get here, 93 million miles, give or take.

22 posted on 12/01/2014 8:10:44 AM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Class M stars burn much hotter than our star, and with a peak wavelength in red suggests that they are giants. I’m an astronomy rookie so I will defer to your understanding but I thought that stars that exhibit these characteristics are significantly larger than the Sun.


23 posted on 12/01/2014 8:21:48 AM PST by gcraig (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
The main sequence star classes are O, B, A, F, G, K, and M.

I remember reading many years ago of a mnemonic to remember the order: "O, be a fine girl, kiss me."

Probably that is now illegal to quote as sexist and heteronormative.

24 posted on 12/01/2014 8:36:07 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: going hot

The idea is the photons formed within the sun take along time working their way out from the interior of the sun because they are continually bouncing off of interior solar matter.


25 posted on 12/01/2014 8:37:41 AM PST by AceMineral (One day men will beg for chains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: going hot

“Would that make the sun 2 million light years across?”

I think is not be due to physical distance, but to gravity. The gravity at the center of the Sun is much greater than at the surface, so if a photon was generated at the center, it’s path through spacetime would be seriously “warped”, and take longer to travel.


26 posted on 12/01/2014 8:45:13 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: going hot

No, it doesn’t. A “light year” is based on a photon traveling thru a vacuum, not thru a dense medium involving frequent energy form transitions & related reactions. Think of your running speed thru thin air vs molasses or solid rock.

And it’s comments like “would that make the sun 2 million light years across?” that are face-palm infuriating when trying to have a sane discussion about cosmology. If you don’t grasp the basics of physics, stop trying to argue that it’s science that’s stupid about reality.


27 posted on 12/01/2014 8:49:23 AM PST by ctdonath2 (You know what, just do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

That argument is akin to saying the number 12 is not unremarkable precisely because it is the only number equally close to 11 and 13; the criteria for “remarkable” being relevant only to a short-lived life-form eeking out its existence on the thin crust of an orbiting planet, and not “remarkable” in any absolute terms such as size, rotational velocity, percentage of heavy elements, etc.


28 posted on 12/01/2014 8:55:49 AM PST by ctdonath2 (You know what, just do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

How many class M planets are there?


29 posted on 12/01/2014 8:59:30 AM PST by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcraig

You’re thinking of a star like Betelgeuse, which is an M2Iab supergiant star that is not a star on the Main Sequence as I described. The M designated the Harvard Spectral Classification for a red spectral type and the Arabic numeral 2 designated the hotter end of a range of 0 to 9. The Yerkes Spectral Classification of Iab is the Roman numeral and alphabetic letter designated ab class of luminosity associated with a class of supergiant stars not on the Main Sequence.

An example of a red Type M star which is on the Main Sequence of stars is AD Leonis M3.5e V. Harvard Spectral Classification M and Yerkes Spectral Classification Roman Numeral V for Main Sequence so-called dwarf stars.


30 posted on 12/01/2014 9:04:57 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

With so many factors determining whether a planet has a life-sustaining atmosphere, there is little chance that we will ever find other intelligent life.


31 posted on 12/01/2014 9:17:38 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Good Muslims, like good Nazis or good liberals, are terrible human beings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: going hot
Would that make the sun 2 million light years across?

You assume that photons travel at 186,000 miles per second no matter what the environment.

What lies beneath the surface of our Sun is so dense, so electromagnetically charged and the gravity so immense that photons...and every other particle...behave in much different ways than we observe here on Earth. Thus, it takes a very long time for a photon to travel from the Sun's core to the surface.

32 posted on 12/01/2014 9:39:07 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are not inclined to commit crimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“With so many factors determining whether a planet has a life-sustaining atmosphere, there is little chance that we will ever find other intelligent life.”

Even assuming odds of one in a million when eliminating various factors, there should be something on the order of billions of planets and non-planetary locations in the Milky Way Galaxy alone where life exists and/or existed, millions of locations where intelligent life existed in this galaxy, and thousands of civilizations of intelligent life in existence at this moment in just this one galaxy. Then you multiply thousands or millions of civilizations per galaxy in the present or the past by the hundreds of billions of galaxies, and you get an awful large number of civilizations with intelligent life in the deep space beyond the Earth and its Solar System.


33 posted on 12/01/2014 9:51:38 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Ah, ok that makes sense to me now. Yes I was thinking of the red giants that had moved off of the MS. Thank you for helping me understand it better now.


34 posted on 12/01/2014 9:59:04 AM PST by gcraig (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: gcraig

Don’t forget, the Sun will move off the Main Sequence and become an M III Red Giant and move back and forth through some phases as it burns Helium and then moves into the final white dwarf terminal phase. See the Wikipedia article on the Sun in the area discussing the life cycle and Main Sequence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun


35 posted on 12/01/2014 10:56:47 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Only Spock knows for sure


36 posted on 12/01/2014 11:03:51 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

If nothing else, it’s the only star in the universe known to support life.

That makes it unique beyond comprehension.


37 posted on 12/01/2014 11:08:25 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: going hot

http://www.askamathematician.com/2013/08/q-why-does-it-take-thousands-of-years-for-light-to-escape-the-sun/


38 posted on 12/01/2014 3:58:56 PM PST by Mmogamer (I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Thank you for the kind remarks:

It is my stupidity that questions statements that are generalized and based on calculations that are based on assumptions, some of which are imagined to be truth, while others are based on mathematical models of what they think happens, but have never reproduced them because of the extreme conditions imagined..

Photons move like a particle and interact like a wave.

The mathematical analysis that people draw on to make the 1000 year statement leave out a few important tidbits. Namely that some of the energy of a particular photon created at the core (Or possibly anywhere in the globe, who knows?)where fusion is taking place within, is released from the core to the surface in only a few minutes, (once again supposed, theoretically) and what eventually reaches the surface is nowhere near resembling what was the original photon created at the core as a result of fusion of H to He.

To generalize the statement by saying a photon take several thousands of years to get to the surface is not factual, in fact misleading, and not really "cosmology" supporting statement.

39 posted on 12/01/2014 8:09:41 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AceMineral
Understood the general idea. Specifically, it is a bit more complicated.

Thanks for the reply.

40 posted on 12/01/2014 8:11:33 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson