Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cut the Crap: The problem is islam, and it has to be exterminated. Period.
Barnhardt ^ | Jan 8, 2015 | Ann Barnhardt

Posted on 01/09/2015 11:06:50 AM PST by Politically Correct

So, a little review for those of you who may be new.

1. Islam is a political system, NOT a religion, and unless and until humanity wakes the hell up and STOPS referring to it as a religion, there is no hope. Islam is a hyper-aggressive, militaristic, expansionist, totalitarian political system designed to create a super-rich micro-oligarchical ruling class with a massive, destitute, genetically handicapped underclass below. The paper-thin faux-religious facade was a conscious, specific con from the very beginning – much like Mormonism and Scientology – a pure racket using borrowed and piggy-backed religious motifs to lend credibility to a massive, loosely-knit network of crime syndicate cells.

Here is a quote from Osama bin Laden that sums it all up:

“Our talks with the infidel West and our conflict with them ultimately revolve around one issue; one that demands our total support, with power and determination, with one voice, and it is: Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually? Yes. There are only three choices in Islam: [1] either willing submission [conversion]; or [2] payment of the jizya, through physical, though not spiritual, submission to the authority of Islam; or [3] the sword, for it is not right to let him [an infidel] live. The matter is summed up for every person alive: Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die.” –Osama Bin Laden
(The Al Qaeda Reader, p. 42)

Definition of suzerainty: a situation in which a region or people is a compulsory tributary to a more powerful entity, which controls its foreign affairs while allowing the tributary vassal state internal autonomy.

Please note that the quote above makes perfectly clear that islam DOES NOT CARE IF YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE ANY OF THEIR FAUX-RELIGIOUS BULLSHIT OR NOT – BECAUSE THAT’S NOT THE POINT. All that matters is EARTHLY submission and control of landmass. All of that five-times-per-day sticking one’s butt in the air while some bisexual shrieks about a non-existent pagan moon deity over a loudspeaker is not “prayer”. It is an outward sign of submission to the musloid political system. NOTHING more. It’s a gang signal. It’s a salute.

Islam isn’t about “allah” or “paradise” or “prayer” or “spirituality” or how human beings should relate to one another or how human beings should relate to a “god” or the eternal fate of the human soul. THEY DON’T CARE ABOUT ANY OF THAT. Islam is about acquiring physical, earthly territory and installing a totalitarian government over the earth that provides a cadre of “elites” masquerading as some sort of “clergy” with massive decadent wealth and as much twisted perverted sex as they want, including homosexual and heterosexual pedohilia, ephebophilia, concubinage, incest, bestiality and necrophilia. There is nothing new under the sun. They want power, they want money and they want sex. The “religious” aspects are a stone-cold con, which Bin Laden himself declared in no uncertain terms.

2. They can’t be reasoned with. They can’t be dialogued with. There is no such thing as “radical islam”. There is islam, which is even more bloodthirsty, conscienceless and perverse than what we are seeing today. We cannot possibly imagine what they would do if given true carte-blanche. Islam today is like an eleven year old boy – just BARELY on the cusp of puberty, just BEGINNING to test the waters. These beheadings, rapes, suicide attacks and terror operations are BUSH LEAGUE. Just as it is nonsensical and depraved to refer to Nazis as “radical Nazis” and “moderate Nazis” – as if ANY Nazism could ever be considered acceptable, so it is with islam. This is why Egyptian president Sisi’s recent speech calling for a “reformation” of islam is nonsense. All Sisi’s speech did was confirm that Sisi himself doesn’t actually believe any of it, and instead of doing the morally correct thing and renouncing islam, Sisi wants to have his pancakes and eat them too. He wants everyone – like him – to subscribe to and associate themselves with something that they don’t actually believe in or take seriously. (How very Pope Francis of him.) Well, you can pour maple syrup on a puddle of bloody, diarrhetic hogshit all you want, but it will never, ever be pancakes.

3. Just to be sure that the info is out there as much as possible, here is the “offensive” mohammed cartoon, followed by a link to a cartoon published a while back by the same magazine depicting the Holy Trinity – in retaliation for the Church reiterating that sodomite “marriage” was an ontological impossibility, and that the farce of “gay marriage” was a grave evil. I can’t post the cartoon of the Trinity because I just can’t. But I will describe it, and then you can decide whether you want to look at it or not. God the Father is on the left, depicted as a grey, bearded man, glassy-eyed, mouth open, tongue hanging out like a dog, bending over at the waist being sodomized by God the Son, also glassy-eyed, wearing the crown of thorns, holes visible in His hands and feet, who is in turn being sodomized by the Holy Spirit, depicted as the triangle with the all-seeing eye in the center. Here it is.

The picture of mohammed below says, “100 lashes if you don’t die laughing!”

That’s it. That’s all.

So people like islam-appeaser Bill Donohue who argue that islam was “provoked” would only have a rhetorical leg to stand – and a feeble one at that – only if any other Christian anywhere had responded to the Charlie Hebdo cartoon of the Trinity in any way other than praying for the conversion and salvation of the Charlie Hebdo staff and readership. If you pray the rosary, you do just that many times per day.

“O My Jesus, forgive us our sins. Save us from the fires of hell, and lead all souls to heaven, especially those in most need of Thy Mercy.”

4. I see that there have been many protest marches and gatherings in France wherein people are holding up signs saying, “Je suis Charlie.” “I am Charlie.” Um, I’m not Charlie. These people were not the pillars of society or role models, as evidenced by their pro-sodomite blasphemy linked above. Satan frequently uses these multi-vectored attacks because one has to be able to process multiple datasets simultaneously AND identify and maintain the connections (and disconnections) between them. And, as we have discussed before, modern western man has been so dumbed-down and contra-educated that holding ONE premise and following a single-track logical progression is nearly impossible for most people today. In this case, we have to juggle multiple subjects and then tease out the truth and the morally upright position and reaction. Let’s see if we can do it.

A.) These people did not deserve to be murdered. Obviously.

B.) They are not martyr saints.

C.) Freedom of speech is not a “god” unto itself. Only God is God, and His rights trump ours. Americans, in particular, have a tendency to worship the Constitution and the American governmental paradigm, particularly with regard to the “rights of man” over and above God. Careful with that. It’s a very slippery slope.

D.) The issue here is islam, and the fault, blame and culpability for these murders lies squarely in the lap of islam and nowhere else. No excuses can be made, no justification can be fabricated, no quarter can be given. Islam cares not a whit about our arguments amongst ourselves regarding freedom of speech or anything else. All islam cares about is complete earthly submission to islam, and it will happily let us argue amongst ourselves while it slaughters us where we sit.

5. I’d like to mention briefly the fact that a woman let the gunmen into the building, knowing exactly who and what they were and what they were going to do. Apparently she was scared, and the gunmen told her they were not going to kill her – and they didn’t.

I think that level of cowardice she displayed in that situation is criminal and should be prosecutable as involuntary manslaughter. Here are the criteria for Involuntary Manslaughter:

a. Someone was killed as a result of act by the defendant. Check.
b. The act either was inherently dangerous to others or done with reckless disregard for human life. Check.
c. The defendant knew or should have known his or her conduct was a threat to the lives of others. Check.

But then, are we surprised that a person associated with this magazine was lacking in the moral virtue of courage? Again, be very careful about enthusiastically attaching yourself to these magazine people as heroes or role models. See the big picture without being pulled down into the weeds.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized on January 8, ARSH 2015.


TOPICS: History; Miscellaneous; Religion
KEYWORDS: annbarnhardt; barnhardt; islam; religion; terror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: DoodleDawg

They (whoever “they” are) often say the first step in resolving a problem is to admit that you have one.

In this regard, coming to terms that Islam is not of peace in any fashion and getting the populace to understand that is one very big step in my opinion.


41 posted on 01/09/2015 11:51:40 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wattsgnu
I didn’t read it yet, but I think her solution is in her title.

And is nowhere in the body of her article. Exterminate them how?

42 posted on 01/09/2015 11:53:13 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

A woman in my office has a sign on her desk.

51% Angel. 49% Bitch

Take Your Chances.


43 posted on 01/09/2015 11:53:38 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (Hi Al Baby's Mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Politically Correct
Change 'Islam' to 'plague' and would anyone(did anyone) think, much less say, that it must be tolerated? Would humanity have been stupid enough to go rat by rat to try to eliminate the threat to humanity? Did-would-people think they could and should co-exist with something that was wiping out millions and would continue to? OF COURSE NOT! Here we have a rampaging threat to humanity as a whole-something that admits it's purpose is to conquer and kill-IT MUST BE ERADICATED. They have the guts to act on their beliefs-why don't we? Is mankind as a whole PCed into guilt and submission by suicide? The Muslim in the convenience store is the same as the plague rat in the street-it carries death, believes in death, LOVES death and will obey it's nature to spread death.Rats didn't do it knowingly, Muslims DO!
Islam must be declared illegal and wiped from existence. Mosques must be demolished, Koran's purged from our societies. ALL Muslims should be rounded up and DEPORTED to the hellhole that is the Middle East. If they resist violently, they meet the death they love. Get all things Muslim out of civilized nations-NOW. Then-erase Mecca. Nothing short of this will save civilization as we know it here. Nothing. We all know it- Muslims admit they will continue Jihad until they win or die.
Islam has not changed, will not change, cannot change. Muslims have made the rules- they are in the Koran-and they will accept nothing other than total domination or death.That thinking hasn't changed in centuries-it won't. Nazis couldn't be reasoned with- neither can Islam. UGLY truth is still truth. So....is it a civilized, progressive future or decay into the 12th century and barbarism? EVERYONE who believes in the Koran want's the latter. What are we prepared to DO???
44 posted on 01/09/2015 11:54:27 AM PST by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam- it's about Islam. That death cult must be eradicated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

And I have one that reads: “Women are Angels. And if you break our wings we get by on broomsticks. We’re flexible that way.” Same concept.


45 posted on 01/09/2015 11:55:31 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
"She used to DARE her enemies to come get her."

I loved her video of using bacon slices as bookmarks in her Koran - then she burns the whole deal - awesome!

46 posted on 01/09/2015 11:56:21 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Yes


47 posted on 01/09/2015 11:57:12 AM PST by papertyger ("News" is what journalists want to say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
I disagree with that chart. A tranny is by definition

1) Not a woman.

2) Greater than 10 crazy.

48 posted on 01/09/2015 12:00:17 PM PST by NorthMountain (No longer TEA Party ... I'm the TAF Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Politically Correct

This is true. Everyone with any brains knows it’s true. Islam is NO MORE a religion than was nazism or communism.
Unfortunately there will need to be more attacks on our home front of large enough scale to make the point stick.


49 posted on 01/09/2015 12:03:59 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politically Correct

Burn the mosques. Kill all of the imamns. deport or shoot the rest.


50 posted on 01/09/2015 12:09:30 PM PST by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politically Correct

I don’t care what this girl thinks. The next time I am in my grocery store and I see the moon-worshipper with his wife in full hijab I am walking up to him and saying: “Je suis Charlie”.

Then I’m putting ham, bacon and porkchops into the “halal” freezer.

Call it “passive aggression”.


51 posted on 01/09/2015 12:11:26 PM PST by Don W (When blacks riot, neighborhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Charlie Hebdo cartoonist reveals terrorists threatened to murder her toddler unless she let them in – and how she cowered with child under desk as massacre took place
"A young mother and cartoonist who survived the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris today said she had let the suspected Al Qaeda killers into the magazine office.

Corrine Rey said she had returned from picking up her young daughter from a kindergarten when she was confronted by two heavily armed men wearing balaclavas.

‘I had gone to pick up my daughter at day care, arriving in front of the magazine building, where two masked and armed men brutally threatened us,’ said Ms Rey, who draws under the name ‘Coco’.


52 posted on 01/09/2015 12:15:26 PM PST by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Politically Correct
The paper-thin faux-religious facade was a conscious, specific con from the very beginning – much like Mormonism and Scientology...

She forgot TUCC, of black liberation philosophy fame in Chicago.

53 posted on 01/09/2015 12:22:14 PM PST by zipper (In their heart of hearts, all Democrats are communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politically Correct

sensible young lady


54 posted on 01/09/2015 12:22:26 PM PST by KC Burke (I know my screen name says KC but I'm in AZ now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
Is fear of punishment an accepted excuse for lying?

Worked for Bill Clinton. :)

55 posted on 01/09/2015 12:24:13 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves (Heteropatriarchal Capitalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Politically Correct
Suzerainty (/ˈsjuːzərənti/ or /ˈsjuːzərɛnti/) is a situation in which a region or people is a tributary to a more powerful entity, which controls its foreign affairs while allowing the tributary vassal state internal autonomy.[1] The dominant entity in the suzerainty relationship, or the more powerful entity itself, is called a suzerain. The term suzerainty was originally used to describe the relationship between the Ottoman Empire and its surrounding regions. It differs from sovereignty in that the tributary enjoys some (often limited) self-rule.

A suzerain can also refer to a feudal lord, to whom vassals must pay tribute. Although it is a concept which has existed in a number of historical empires, it is a concept that is very difficult to describe using 20th- or 21st-century theories of international law, in which sovereignty either exists or does not. While a sovereign nation can agree by treaty to become a protectorate of a stronger power, modern international law does not recognize any way of making this relationship compulsory on the weaker power.

Never knew this word...

56 posted on 01/09/2015 12:28:40 PM PST by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Yes???

And so when a muzzie tells you to open that door or your child will be killed; your response is...

“By baby. I love you. (to the muzzie:) Don’t shoot her in the head, please. We’d like an open casket funeral.”


57 posted on 01/09/2015 12:29:55 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Hi Al Baby's Mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Love her ‘Jihad works both ways’ poster...


58 posted on 01/09/2015 12:31:26 PM PST by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Loved that vid..!!


59 posted on 01/09/2015 12:32:01 PM PST by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Worked for Bill Clinton. :)

Be that as it may, I categorically reject the idea of gynocentric exceptionalism championed by misguided "white knights."

60 posted on 01/09/2015 12:35:21 PM PST by papertyger ("News" is what journalists want to say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson