Skip to comments.
Texans bringing back pot from their Colorado vacations
khou ^
| 2-4-2015
| Marcelino Benito
Posted on 02/04/2015 9:21:57 AM PST by Citizen Zed
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
To: DiogenesLamp
Texans bringing pot back from Colorado has no bearing on the claim that usage will grow if the product is made available.PUT DOWN THE ROACH CLIP AND STEP AWAY FROM THE KEYBOARD!
Bringing back from Colorado is very possibly just a change in source rather than new usage - Colorado sellers effectively cutting into Texas dealers' market - so my statement is accurate.
41
posted on
02/05/2015 7:21:53 AM PST
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: DiogenesLamp; Ken H
There is no obligation from them to tell the truth one way or the other. There is also no reason to expect systematic changes in degree of truth-telling from one year to another, so a lack of increase in self-reported use is meaningful.
And let's not forget, "Reliable or not, those are the figures being put out by the people who make it their job to come up with such figures. No doubt they are a statistical extrapolation. Till someone presents an argument that there are better figures, I will have no choice but to use what is available."
42
posted on
02/05/2015 7:26:44 AM PST
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
There is also no reason to expect systematic changes in degree of truth-telling from one year to another, so a lack of increase in self-reported use is meaningful. As useful as a roulette wheel or a dart board.
To: DiogenesLamp
There is also no reason to expect large random changes in degree of truth-telling from one year to another, so a lack of increase in self-reported use is meaningful.
44
posted on
02/05/2015 8:05:14 AM PST
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
45
posted on
02/05/2015 8:34:36 AM PST
by
Marie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson