Do the New England Patriots Prefer White Players?

TruthLamp ^ | 11/17/2014

[Enterprise]

"The article is a big piece of Liberalism. Liberals are enormous racists."

I think an entire college course for 3 units could be taught on the implications on this one article. Liberalism is infantile, jealous, racist, arrogant, and constantly wrongly accusatory to name just some of its pathological characteristics.

After the game I posted - Which is it - Wilson lost because he wasn't black enough, or Brady won because of white privilege?

The article we are discussing was published in November 2014, and I had not read it. But based on the writer's view point, I will make a guess about how the writer thinks of the New England victory.

New England had a white coach, a white quarterback and a mostly white team. That's why they won.

Seattle had a white coach, a black quarterback and a mostly black team. That's why they lost.

Summation - New England won because of whiteness, Seattle lost because of blackness.

[timestax]

ping

[Rick66]

Better being The New England Patriots than the Boston Bell Curves.

[Gay State Conservative]

Something like 80% of the nation's population is white and,it would appear,that 24% of the Pats’ roster is white.And for he last 15 years or so the Pats have at least come close to winning the whole enchilada every single year.I thought winning was the key,whether your roster is 100% black or 100% white.

[SauronOfMordor]

Perhaps the Boston teams provide a home for white players which get rejected from other teams because of anti-white sentiment?

If they were passing up more-qualified blacks, you would expect their win/loss stats to suffer.

[Andy'smom]

Massachusetts is only 8% black.

[NKP_Vet]

With 90% of the NFL black it’s nice to see a team that will actually sign white players. Congrats to the world champion New England Patriots.

[NKP_Vet]

Don’t forget Bailey Howell and Hondo Havicheck, and Don Nelson? All great white Celtics from the 60s and 70s.