No. He is a Jesuit. Jesuits may be extremely evil and devious, but they are always extremely brilliant. There is a reason he promotes lies, when Catholics (esp. the pope) are only supposed to promote the Truth in clear and concise language. All words matter and he KNOWS that simple truth.
He is using the Dialectic to “move” or “evolve” Catholics further to Marxism/Socialism/paganism, where divorce and sodomy is “normal’ and good. He is an anti-pope if what they report is true.
All popes up until VII, condemned the most evil ideologies on earth—Marxism, Islam and Freemasonry (secret societies). Personally, I think the Freemasons infiltrated the Catholic Church, since Pope Pius X stated there was infiltration, and the pope that was murdered after 33 days in office (Pope John Paul I) was going to fire the head of the Vatican Bank (mafia) who took control of the Vatican Bank in the 40s and 50s and was never fired with the “new” pope.
Some of the most evil people in the history of the World, have been Jesuits, or taught by Jesuits. Jesuits created the system of “education” where you can create people who rule and are brilliant, or you can create slaves (happy slaves, of course). Our Prussian system of “public education” is based on the Jesuit system which makes children only capable of taking orders and reading just enough, so they can read simple directions. They are conditioned to be “group thinkers”—only use emotions and unable to be critical thinkers because they have no understanding of anything worthwhile—ideas which created the most brilliant cultures and the most Freedom in the history of the world.
This matrix of systems imposed on us and our children has been in the making for over a hundred years. The final nail is almost in the coffin NOW-—with the capitulation of the Catholic Church, the last power which stood between Communism/Socialism and all the porn and sexualization of children (destruction of the souls/worldview of our children ) (homosexual push).
As the book “Libido Dominandi” explains and St. Augustine knew, the more sexually liberated, the more political and economic control for the State. Vices creates slaves for the State. The more vices, the more masters. The elites know that through sexualization, you can collapse culture. It was the combination of Freud with Marx (as explained in the “Closing of the American Mind”). Lukacs (Cultural Marxist) created Sex Ed in Hungary to collapse their culture—which it did in one generation. The USA adopted their “Sex Ed” programs starting in the 50s-—but it took until the 70s before they could do it more blatantly.
That is why Vice is promoted in the satanic media and public schools 24/7 now (parents are too stupid to understand child psychology because the “parent magazines” have been promoting lies and misinformation forever.
Sex Ed does corrupt and warp our children so they have a tribal worldview like little Afghani harem boys. They will be conditioned to see others as objects to be used, when they grow up and be obsessed with porn or vulgar entertainment/no growth/no maturity-—very puerile minds, controlled by base urges and never reason. Sex is just a recreation tool—which will collapse the Natural Family. People will end up like the Ferguson mobs, easily controlled and bribed by the powerful, totally immoral and ignorant, or just hiding in their basements masturbating.
As Montesquieu stated, Virtue is essential to Free Republics. Christianity (Virtue) was targeted by the Germans in the 19th Century and they are trying to destroy the pillars of Western Civilization for the elites NWO and they KNOW you have to have a One World Religion. That is why the Catholic Church was infiltrated. They are destroying all the tenants of Christianity (done in most Protestant Churches, since 1930-—so Christianity is wishy washy and meaningless and everyone gets to heaven....like Pastor Bonhoeffer stated in 1930 about the Riverside (”religionless”) Rockefeller “church” in NY.
The Natural Family (which protects the moral and emotional formation of children and transmits Christianity and culture (now TV is doing parent’s job)—the most brilliant and perfect theology in the history of man has been targeted by taxes/forcing women into the workforce/ vilifying motherhood and having children, etc-—all done on purpose to create the pagan, Marxist worldview in children (hate/fear) where biology is meaningless—there is no family connections-—the State is god and mommy and daddy. Support systems only consist of the State—no church, family like one hundred years ago.
Christianity has to go because it is the only theology which is consistent with Natural Law Theory and the concept of Individualism-—Individual Natural Rights from God ONLY, and collectives have to destroy the individualism and God idea, which is natural in children raised in a loving Christian home. The concept of “identity” stems first from their sex, biological connections—knowing grandparents and uncles/aunts/cousins, and self-worth comes from having a loving mother and father and belief in God-—which creates healthy, dynamic, hopeful, principled mature males and females. It is imperative to have active role models of both sexes but now children have creepy cartoon characters for role models and know nothing of great men in our history. In fact, our heroes are vilified (on purpose) to make children hate themselves and their heritage-—so they will dismiss the ideology of Individual Natural Rights from God (Christianity-—look at Columbus and Galileo-—all lies about them to generate hate for their profound Christianity).
When children don’t experience a healthy family life, they become dupes and ignorant and needy with low self-esteem. True self-esteem exists because of being loved which takes TIME with loving parents and siblings #1, and being able to master tasks #2-—learning skills, and understanding complex things.
A full 40% of the people that made obnoxious comments on this thread obviously did not read the thread or listen to the speech.
I hope you are happy for spreading derision among the faithful, racebannon.
What you did was evil.
Jesuits are not always brilliant, in intellectual terms, but they are almost always crafty and have a great opinion of themselves. They have a track record for that (odd, since St. Ignatius himself was actually a very honorable man and very brave, but also quite self-effacing, especially considering his social status).
I always have to remind myself of the good Jesuits I have known, either personally or historically (Gerard Manley Hopkins was a Jesuit, but he was definitely a misfit in the order!). Some suffered for the Faith very heroically in Russia and elsewhere under the Communists - but that was before the Jesuits seem to have been taken over by crypto-Marxist thought. Now the few good Jesuits are persecuted by the majority, and unfortunately, Bergoglio represents the majority.
That said, I still don’t think he’s a smart man - although I agree that he’s fully aware of the impact of his actions and that his objective is the destruction of the Church. He backs off every now and then and takes refuge in his senile great uncle act, where he issues a long, windy and vague statement that is supposed to tranquilize us and make us think he didn’t really mean what he just said a few hours earlier. Or not in the way it sounded, at least...
So I think there’s still time to stop him, because he can still be made to back off. But the problem is that he is filling Rome with people of his ilk, exiling, ridiculing or silencing anybody who even murmurs against the program, and has now moved on to silencing bloggers and independent people, mostly clergy but also some laypeople, who are nobody in terms of their power in Rome but are important in shaping opinion. Several blogs that I read in Spanish have suddenly gone silent on him (Pope? What Pope?) or gone from rational, measured analysis to a spate of gushing, usually after the blogger has been “invited” to Rome for a visit. In a couple of cases, bishops and in one case the nuncio have ordered priest bloggers to stop blogging.
In my opinion, Francis is the Obama of the Catholic Church: not a smart man, but a crafty and ruthless one who is completely transforming the position of servant of the servants into one of unlimited power, personally exercised at his whim, and accountable to no one.
BTW, in terms of families, I lived in SF for many years and knew a lot of gay people, and I never met a single one who came from what one might consider a healthy family. Usually the problem was that the father was either absent (many lesbians had this problem) or ineffectual or even brutal. If there was a “smother mother,” something that seemed to be the problem of gay men, it was because the father had abandoned his responsibilities or his role for one reason or another, ranging from alcoholism to just plain dysfunctionality. So in my opinion, homosexuality is definitely the result of a failure of parenting.