Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can genes make us liberal or conservative?
phys.org ^ | August 4, 2015 | Staff

Posted on 08/06/2015 12:54:11 PM PDT by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 08/06/2015 12:54:11 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"Can genes make us liberal or conservative? "

Depends on who's wearing them!

2 posted on 08/06/2015 12:56:39 PM PDT by high info voter (Liberal leftists would have "un-friended" Paul Revere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Another reason to abort.


3 posted on 08/06/2015 12:59:27 PM PDT by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Actually, if it’s really a dopamine pathway issue, then liberalism may be curable with the proper medication.


4 posted on 08/06/2015 1:02:45 PM PDT by JJ_Folderol (Cancelled due to lack of interest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JJ_Folderol

And vice versa?.......................


5 posted on 08/06/2015 1:04:06 PM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Of course. If you are conceived with the stupid gene you’ll be a liberal.


6 posted on 08/06/2015 1:05:49 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Lex rex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yes, if you are genetically predisposed to have poor impulse control and low intelligence you will not be a conservative.


7 posted on 08/06/2015 1:12:03 PM PDT by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

r vs K selection

One maximizes scarce resources to a few individuals, the other maximizes consumption and reproduction to cover an abundance of resources.


8 posted on 08/06/2015 1:17:08 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"Women, it was also shown, tended to be more conservative in general."

Hmmm...

9 posted on 08/06/2015 1:18:00 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JJ_Folderol

Per a couple of TED talks, there are a few psychological differences:
* liberals are hard to disgust, which may be why the “purity” channel (sexual purity type of morality) doesn’t matter to them
* conservatives tend to have greater fear of the unknown and risks, while liberals have a far greater drive for novelty, hence their urge to shake up society without fear of consequences while conservatives value preserving what works
* liberals’ lower in group loyalty leads to despising nationalism and seeking to undermine dominant group symbols; combined with the high novelty, they want immigration to break up the bland majority to add diversity and (in their opinion) make things more interesting


10 posted on 08/06/2015 1:19:10 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JJ_Folderol

Savage was right,”Liberalisim IS a mental disorder”


11 posted on 08/06/2015 1:20:15 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The end result of these eugenics style theories will always be death camps.


12 posted on 08/06/2015 1:21:17 PM PDT by Seruzawa (All those memories will be lost,in time, like tears in rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JJ_Folderol
Actually, if it’s really a dopamine pathway issue, then liberalism may be curable with the proper medication.

Chlopromaizine? Haliperdol anyone?

13 posted on 08/06/2015 1:29:14 PM PDT by Stepan12 (Our present appeasementof Islam is the Stockholm Syndrome on steroids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Of course. If you get the genes for stupidity, you’re likely to end up a “Liberal.” If you’re lucky enough to get the genes for intelligence, you’ll be conservative, honest, and realistic, and you’ll probably wind up posting on Free Republic.


14 posted on 08/06/2015 1:29:58 PM PDT by Savage Beast ("The politicians scattered like roaches" --Ann Coulter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
r vs K selection


15 posted on 08/06/2015 1:32:27 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: high info voter
Depends on who's wearing them!

Ans how tight they are.

16 posted on 08/06/2015 1:37:38 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Savage was right,”Liberalisim IS a mental disorder”

This PC stuff is really just doubling down in Marxism; i.e., applying Marxism not just to economic classes, but race, sex, sexual perversions; etc. Such a mental operation would make anyone mad. Look at Bruce Willis and Rachel Dolezal (sp). There is a youtube were one of these genital self mutilators tries to hurt Ben Shapiro for calling him/it, sir: Ben Shapiro Comments on Transgender HLN Fiasco.

17 posted on 08/06/2015 1:39:02 PM PDT by Stepan12 (Our present appeasementof Islam is the Stockholm Syndrome on steroids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2; LambSlave; redgolum; Paine in the Neck; tbw2; Seruzawa; Savage Beast; ShadowAce

Liberals are made. Conservatives are born....................


18 posted on 08/06/2015 1:40:13 PM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
liberals’ lower in group loyalty leads to despising nationalism and seeking to undermine dominant group symbols; combined with the high novelty, they want immigration to break up the bland majority to add diversity and (in their opinion) make things more interesting

Doesn't make sense given national socialism. I think the latter part of the argument is correct, regarding the novelty, but the loyalty to the group mattered greatly to Communists and Nazis. Many of the communists/world socialists in Nazi Germany converted to National Socialism quite easily. Maybe it was also due to the hope that they would be the new masters, not the peons. Even though that would have never worked out for the majority of them.

19 posted on 08/06/2015 1:40:35 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“What they found was a robust link between the presence (or not) of the variant and a split between liberals inclined to decry inequality, on the one hand, and die-hard conservative wary of change, on the other.”

I reject the whole premise of the hypothysis.


20 posted on 08/06/2015 1:41:06 PM PDT by right way right (Disclaimer: Not a prophet but I have a pretty good record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson