Posted on 08/31/2016 5:46:05 AM PDT by Scythian_Reborn
Agreed.
And I trust Mark Levin will vote for Trump simply because he, too, knows it's the only way to stop the Hildebeast and thereby save what little is left of the Constitution from total destruction.
This "Cruzbot" sh*t needed to go away once our nominee gave his acceptance speech, if not before. It only serves to help Hillary.
United, we stand. Divided, we fall.
Wow, sounds like KAAM in Dallas. To stay afloat, it’s nothing but informercials for most of the afternoon. I know they have to do it, but I don’t listen as much as I used to. They play “legends” music, like Sinatra and Nat King Cole, though in recent years they’ve gone a little more modern with Josh Groban and (yuck) Celine Dion.
Reference:Mark Levin - NON STOP NEVER TRUMP (Vanitiy)
Posted on 8/31/2016, 8:46:05 AM by Scythian_Reborn
Mark Levin should pick a candidate and stop trying to promote
discord. Folks there are only two. Pick one and support them whoever the your choice may be.
“Yeah, how dare Levin question the great Trump! After all we have to blindly follow the Great Trump without question. BTW, when was. The first or last time Trump mentioned the Constitution? I will wait for you to name call me or say I will vote for Clinton. That’s the MO here anymore!”
Are you mewling that we should ELEVATE the TONE???
Is that what you are after?
You Cruzlim Blubberhood types are the most fragile little glass cannons. You log in to whimper, and THIS is your last post before this?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3425013/posts?page=89#89
You cultists are pitiful.
No third party candidate has come close to the presidency in the modern era. In fact, since 1968, only one third party candidate has even cleared 10 percent of the vote — businessman Ross Perot took 20 percent of the vote in 1992, but still did not manage to secure a single electoral vote. But the 2016 election cycle has been anything but predictable. Voters should not waste their vote. Two parties two candidates Hillary or Trump.Choose wisely.
Oh my. Now I see why you linked the comment, as opposed to cutting and pasting it. Some things do not bear repeating.
I’m not saying it was drunk posting, but it’s a good example of what drunk posting looks like, when people actually do it.
Dang. How did that comment get to stay?
When was the last time Cruz passed a bill, actually helped a pro-life bill go through congress, stand up to unions, defund planned parenthood?
“Dang. How did that comment get to stay?”
I’m wondering why this keyboard ‘thug life’ Cruzlim got to stay.
He used to be the great one but now is just the grating one.
My local morning show guys have gotten insufferable on this subject too, not super bashing, but non stop moany defeatist bullshit.
A) Trump is going to win.
B) it’s not going to be for the efforts of the republipussies among us.
C) it’s going to be primarily from the monster (relatively speaking) load of people who’ve usually voted ‘rat and finally got a clue that they are actively seeking to destroy the Republic.
I have yet to speak to a union guy on a jobsite that is not voting for Trump, and this was on jobs in the SF Bay Area before he started upping his game of late.
I got some ribbing from Mexicans on a big concrete job along with the usual “he’s a racist” schtick. I replied that him being a racist was bullshit and if you want to make more money over time due to secured border and lower pressure on your wages you’d vote for him. I added the only reason you’d vote for Hillary or democrats in general is if you wanted “here” to be more like where you came from...
Face to face it’s simple to blow away the reasons for a working class minority to vote for ‘rats. The media appears to have blown their cover in this cycle to such an extent that there is a large mass of our fellow citizens out looking for truth and an alternative. True, we’ve got a fight on our hands because we also have a second front by way of GOPe douchebags and corporate water carriers but remember, true patriots love to be surrounded... More targets! :-)
You are correct, and I can prove the treason… granted, there's 97 other Senators engaged in the act in that proof.
That's precisely it, and somewhat ironically the assertions of Cruz's eligibility prove it; the following is my post on another thread, copied here to avoid typing:
Whatever Mark Levin (and other like-minded conservatives) do this election they will compromise their conservative principles ... either by voting for Donald Trump (who they consider to be a flawed candidate with questionable -- at best -- conservative credentials) or by failing to defend our Constitution from the vicious and unrelenting attacks of the Left -- despite knowing that the only way they can do so this year is by voting for Donald Trump.I'm going to disagree, slightly: Levin already has compromised, precisely because of his endorsement of Ted Cruz. As a Constitutional scholar he should know that someone born outside the US to an alien father and possibly ex-citizen mother isn't a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution. — This is obvious given just a moment of thought: imagine an NBC who, as member of the first generation of natural-born citizens, moves to Europe and marries into the royal family of England, say the Crown Princess, and they have a son: if the NBC qualification is conferred on him, then that son (who is in-line for the throne) is also eligible for President. — Thus one of the greatest fears of the founders would be realized by the very mechanism adopted to prevent it. (Namely the natural born citizen requirement, which was advised by John Jay in a letter:
Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.)So we see w/ this (albeit informal) proof-by-contradiction that endorsing Cruz undermines the Constitution; now a lot of people were deceived by Cruz's assertions of his eligibility, but someone like Mr. Levin (a Constitutional lawyer/scholar) should be beyond excuse in the matter.
My
working theoryis that the 2012 and 2008 (esp.) elections were st up to push Constitutionally ineligible/questionable candidates into the office and use that precedence to erode the qualification requirement, which is obviously nationalistic in its purpose and execution, by the globalists that have infested the political caste of our country. Just my theory, but given how hard the GOPe pushed Cruz (and tried/tries to beat down Trump) it seems to qualify for thethree times is enemy actionrule.
Mail his books back to him with a brief note explaining why, and that you’ll be buying no more of his books, repeated on the inside covers. If enough people do this, he might begin to fear for his bottom line.
It is enough that we have learned. Of course, I knew from 1980 that Bush the Elder was a lib in drag, but it took this globalist movement to out people like Levin and Kristol and Barnes and Hume. Glad to know it now.
But Ted Cruz represents Yorlik803’s values and principles.
Miss you Mark. There is no C!
Probably a good idea, thanks!
I just don't get the anti-trump sentiment from the right. I heard a little bit of Pence in Laura Ingraham yesterday and he used that same old snake oil speak that so many of us have grown sick of. Here is the VP candidate and when speaking of what Trump's policies he started every sentence with "I believe" then further watered down any answer with generalities.
Trump, on the other hand, does not ever do that. He is more likely to give a wrong answer and explain it later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.