Posted on 09/01/2016 7:52:29 AM PDT by Riflema
Sort of like those Philadelphia precinct totals from the 2012 presidential election . . . compare them with an election or two before and they are statistically impossible, but somehow they are still accepted as official.
Great job! Excellent FR sleuthing.
Screen capture all you can in case this goes viral and the governments shut it all down to keep people like you from getting further with it.
Where indeed?
1990 shows no difference between calculated and actual.
Is that possible ?
I am also assuming that the missing are cumulative - the missing for 1995 are still missing today.
1995 had approx 2 million difference.
2005 had approx 12 million difference.
2010 had approx 12 million difference - is that possible ?
Awesome job. I would base it from 86 when the last blanket amnesty was granted. I would also run the numbers for the rest of Central America.
Once done I would send it to Trump. I suspect there are as many as 50 million illegals.
Where have you gone, folks of Mexico?
A nation turns it’s lonely eyes to you
Woo woo woo
What’s that you say, Mrs. Rodriguez?
Pedro has gone north with Old Jose
Hey hey hey?
Hey hey hey
It would be better based on 86, the date of the last blanket amnesty. That would truly be the no diff between calculated and actual basis.
The big bump occurred, not due to 86 amnesty, but due to Clinton Treas Sec Rubin destroying the Mexican economy (for their own good) in the 90s. Rubin forced the Maquiladoras to flee Mexico for Asia. Those unemployed then looked for jobs where they could find them... here. When the fled there were no longer customers for the retail sector... So the retail employees...and business owners also came here.
Those stats neglect the children born here to illegal parents. I don’t consider them to be citizens, either.
I would assume that you took 1990 as a base year and based your calculations off the assumption that the census population was the zero-illegal one. Given that, you may be underestimating the total as your calculation accounts only for illegals emigrating after 1990. Of course there are no reliable numbers for death rates of illegals in the US. Deaths would reduce the total number, while births would not increase the total since birthright citizenship makes those children born here US citizens, and hence not illegals (Just stating fact here, not expressing approval)
The website Index Mundi started in 2000 and they accumulate data from the CIA Factbook.
Other good sources are the World Bank and the UN.
Another good source is Wikipedia. the problem there is how you search. You can use the Wikipedia search function or search Wikipedia using a Google search, such as: "Wikipedia Mexico immigration rate"
I don’t think the start date of your analysis matters to 1986 or 1990. I would want to run the data by someone who deals in Mexican demographics. I wonder how the entity that produced this data handles non documenteds leaving the country.
Interesting that Mexico has 2.5 million births compared to USA 3.9 million births. Also note that the # of births is declining like it is in the USA.
Quite a few years ago I remember reading that of all living Mexicans who were born in Mexico, one in seven were in the United States.
Yep, I went with 1990 as the nearest year which the had numbers for. Given what happened in 86, I’d be shocked if a bunch of our neighbors didn’t jump the fence between 86 and 90, so, yes, I’m understating it.
I heard a second rationale: NAFTA allowed our farm products to go there very much cheaper and made their small backward family farms unviable. Thus the peasants looked for other stuff to do.
I just went with 1990 as the baseline as it was shortly after the amnesty and was the earliest data they had an overall population for. And yes, the birthrate was phenomenal.
clinton’s nafta also destroyed mexican farmer who couldn’t compete with US grain producers.
You’re right. But the Mexican land ownership system is so lousy that it is more to blame than NAFTA.
Also we send increased corn/wheat to Mexico. They send increased fresh fruit and vegetables to us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.