Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On this day in 1863

Posted on 05/02/2017 1:53:27 PM PDT by Bull Snipe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: BenLurkin

Thanks


41 posted on 05/02/2017 4:05:15 PM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jolla

“Drawl the sword and throw down the scabard”


42 posted on 05/02/2017 4:08:44 PM PDT by Midnitethecat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jonascord

Actually the source you cite is Catton’s trilogy about the Army of the Potomac. It is devoted to the actions of the AOP. Read it in the mid 60s.


43 posted on 05/02/2017 4:09:40 PM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; Terry Mross; BroJoeK; DoodleDawg
But the final straw for the men under his command was when word leaked out over his unnatural attraction to six year old Janie Corbin during the winter of 1862. It was more than any decent Southerner could stomach.

Does your tagline -- "The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both." -- apply to your post?

I didn't get that from the movie. I mean -- we think Stonewall's relationship with the child is creepy. But did people at the time think so? Did Ron Maxwell, who made the film, even think so?

We might find the relationship between Lewis Armistead and Winfield Scott Hancock (Richard Jordan and Brian Mallon) in Gettysburg "creepy," but people 150 years ago wouldn't. That was just the way people expressed themselves back then. And people 150 years from now -- what will they think?

44 posted on 05/02/2017 4:09:43 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sam 911

Looks like the 18th NC were the troops that fired on Jackson and his staff.


45 posted on 05/02/2017 4:11:55 PM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: LonePalm

Consensus is that it was troops from the 18th NC that fired on Jackson and his staff. They were raised in South Eastern NC.


46 posted on 05/02/2017 4:15:59 PM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Dug out my copy of D-Day to play with my 13 year old. Fun memories.


47 posted on 05/02/2017 4:17:47 PM PDT by GreenLanternCorps (Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Ask about franchise opportunities in your area.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Those that replaced him did not rise to his level of leadership.


48 posted on 05/02/2017 4:20:47 PM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: x

You want creepy? Abraham Lincoln enjoyed sleeping with men:

“[W]hatever the level of intimacy of the relationship, it was the subject of gossip. Elizabeth Woodbury Fox, the wife of Lincoln’s naval aide, wrote in her diary for November 16, 1862, “Tish says, ‘Oh, there is a Bucktail soldier here devoted to the president, drives with him, and when Mrs. L. is not home, sleeps with him.’ What stuff!”[10]
[10] Michael B. Chesson, “Afterword: ‘The Intimate World of Abraham Lincoln’,” p. 245, Free Press, 2005, ISBN 0-7432-6639-0

“This sleeping arrangement was also noted by a fellow officer in Derickson’s regiment, Thomas Chamberlin, in the book History of the One Hundred and Fiftieth Regiment Pennsylvania Volunteers, Second Regiment, Bucktail Brigade.”[44]
[44] Martin P. Johnson, “Did Abraham Lincoln Sleep with His Bodyguard? Another Look at the Evidence”, Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association, Vol 27 No 2 (Summer 2006)


49 posted on 05/02/2017 4:24:38 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GreenLanternCorps

Also very cool! More so even!


50 posted on 05/02/2017 4:28:07 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

You’re better than spreading that crap. Aren’t you?


51 posted on 05/02/2017 4:34:43 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Read your own source. Martin Johnson is skeptical that there was anything sexual going on and not convinced that it even happened.

But you haven't answered my post. Was there any truth at all in what you wrote about Jackson? Or was it just more BS?

52 posted on 05/02/2017 4:41:52 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

It’s history. Despite what Henry Ford might have thought of history, it is not bunk.


53 posted on 05/02/2017 4:50:21 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: x

There sources cited on the thread for all of this except the fragging. So was he fragged? I can’t prove it. Chances are very good that the guys who shot him had no way of knowing about Jacksons’ predilections.

And to give Jackson and Lee credit, they weren’t often as stupid with the lives of their soldiers as were the union generals.

But to anyone who might consider Jackson some kind of hero, remember: he was a crazed fanatic who thought that not only was fighting for slavery was the right thing to do — but that he was somehow doing God’s will in fighting for it.


54 posted on 05/02/2017 4:55:09 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; rockrr
There sources cited on the thread for all of this except the fragging. So was he fragged? I can’t prove it. Chances are very good that the guys who shot him had no way of knowing about Jacksons’ predilections.

That he had some "predilections," and that they were known to his men, and that he was shot on purpose were the only things new in your post, and now you say you can't prove them.

Stonewall's not a hero to me, but it's not right to just make up stuff about him.

55 posted on 05/02/2017 5:05:21 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Great post, thanks!


56 posted on 05/02/2017 5:09:38 PM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: x

We know he had an unsettling attraction to six year old Janie Corbin. That’s undisputed.

AS for the fragging, no one knows for sure. It’s just a shame they didn’t do it sooner.

And you do know that all this happened over 150 years ago, right? Nobody should be taking any of it seriously.


57 posted on 05/02/2017 5:11:57 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; rockrr
Unsettling to you, and to most people today, but was it unsettling to people at the time?

Indications are Ron Maxwell, who made the movie, and Mort Kunstler, who painted a picture, didn't find it disturbing.

Were people 150 years ago really more jaded than people a decade or so back?

On second thought, why bother? It's not like I'm going to get a straight answer from you.

58 posted on 05/02/2017 5:19:55 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It’s not “history” anymore than the claim that you bugger baby baboons. (I read it somewhere).


59 posted on 05/02/2017 5:42:19 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

Really? You do see I sourced that right?

Here’s the longer article for you, if you’re interested.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexuality_of_Abraham_Lincoln


60 posted on 05/02/2017 5:44:32 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson