Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Rod Rosenstein recuses himself, Robert Mueller may be next (Turley)
The Hill ^ | June 16, 2017 | Jonathan Turley

Posted on 06/16/2017 6:05:20 PM PDT by Golden Eagle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Golden Eagle
-- To be specific, "they" would be the DoJ, to include Sessions input. --

Sessions really is totally out of the investigation handed to Mueller in the appointment letter. He has no input there. Any negotiation of Mueller scope of investigation is between Mueller and Rosenstein.

Mueller has a handful of FBI open investigations. Flynn, Manafort, Carter Page, and a couple more (names escape me). He can run those down without any conflict. If he is tempted to pick up obstruction, he'll consider that this opens up a conflict inquiry, at least. He and Rosenstein can avoid all the baggage that comes with a conflict inquiry, easily.

Deferring the obstruction accusation doesn't make it go away, it just affects who it gets assigned to, if it is ever assigned.

I'm reluctant to paint Rosenstrin as a skunk, in light of his "these are the reasons Comey is not a good guy for the FBI" memo. That memo is a work of art. It will go down in history.

Mueller, I don't trust. And he is old enough to be totally indifferent about damage to his reputation. But just because there are plenty good reasons to not trust him, doesn't mean he will try to skin Trump.

41 posted on 06/17/2017 7:14:46 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
(Nods. Test passed.)

I truly believe that if Our President doesn't get a handle on these traitors within, the next stop is Civil War.

Does it not bother anyone that all the members of the Select Committee on Intelligence new for months that Trump was not under investigation and yet they let Schumer and Schiff go forward making all these baseless charges, even letting them hold investigations on something that was not true?

This is us and Trump against the deep swamp and not talking about this serves no one. Unless of course you are pulling for CW II, I am not.

ps. You know if those scum on the committee knew Trump was not under investigation so did the MSM, yet what has dominated the news?

42 posted on 06/17/2017 9:38:36 AM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
What bothers me more is the smug punk-ass look on Ryan's face.


43 posted on 06/17/2017 12:06:18 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
What bothers me more is the smug punk-ass look on Ryan's face.

You Lou Dobbs and I agree.

44 posted on 06/17/2017 3:37:28 PM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson