Posted on 09/05/2017 2:33:53 PM PDT by BJ1
She has a certain je ne sais quoi...
It would be wrong to sexually objectify that hot little strumpet...
Couples who wed after the age of twenty five have a better chance of a lasting relationship
Female, single and enjoying my freedom to be who I am and stuff.
Looks like a tranny. Ick.
couples married after 90 have the best chance of a life-long marriage. Just saying.
LOL!
It’s just that I think compulsory heterosexual monogamy is the least romantic idea since standardised testing, and I don’t see why our best ideals of love and lust and passion and dedication need to be boxed into it.
We are genetically programmed to partner up in monogamous relationships. It really doesn't matter if you want to think of this Darwinistically or Biblically: You still get the same answer. Human babies require far, far more time and effort to raise than other mammal babies. This means that two parents are essential for raising offspring; ergo, strong monogamous partnerships are instinctive. You can most easily achieve satisfaction and happiness when you satisfy your natural instincts.
I could go on with this explanation for hours, but I will leave it there.
However, women tend to become less independent when the ol’ biological clock winds down. Not good because most men at their age are married, divorced, with kids, and are not interested. “All of the good ones are married.”
Dude. It’s Sammich.
and don’t put a damn piece of avocado on it.
That is why she is wearing black. She’s a “black widow.”
It already went up from the history 10% to 20% for Baby Boomer women.
This is a logical result of feminists denying men equal opportunity for education and well paying careers, resulting in a large minority asking “Where are the educated, well-paid men we’re supposed to marry?”
It is compounded by men who grew up in broken homes seeing no benefit to marriage or afraid of it because an out of wedlock child affects income but doesn’t take half his property, too.
In a genetics/eugenics discussion, they were asking what traits would be selected for or against since we’ve wiped out selective pressure.
I said the pressures that remain are those humans can control. And since we can control fertility and social situations, it is leading to selection FOR women who are pro-child since pro-abortion means they breed at below replacement levels and against feminism, if that is a personality type with any genetic basis. Those that aren’t having children at all will eventually run into biological and social barriers to the ideology.
They reacted as if it were blasphemy, because the words were coming from a woman.
Carley Simons “That’s the Way I Always Heard it Should Be” Great song. Sad. A one percenter in life-Simon and Shuster-who puts down her parents raising her. Then she marries a junkie. Go figure.
C:10, H:7
NO_GO_ZONE for sure
This is exactly what the left wants1
Yup. But didn’t she agree to marry him in the song?
For good or bad, traditions helped people find happiness. To a limit of course — wouldn’t want an old lady picking my wife. But there is a lot to be said for the “old ways.”
She’ll haul your behind into “family” court, strip you of your wealth for the next 21 to 24 years, turn your kid against you and make your life a living H-E double toothpicks.
Women don’t seem to yearn for the old days. Just the guys in my observation. It’s like women think men were oppressive in the 50s/60s and earlier. I’m too young, maybe some aged Freepers can clue me in on how men treated women back in the 50s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.